It's 7:45 pn this beautiful monday morning in North Carolina's capitol city, Raleigh ,=. The mood here is vigilant and life affirming as a multitude of city folk return to work after a jubilant weekend. The sun is rising on this fair city, and though sparse in spirit, Raleigh seems to be doing her duty - the heart of town, the heart of the city, the heart of our State is truly a wonder to perceive.
I'm currently texting from my phone, and cars skirt by this lonely island near NC State campus in a fire-brand of grace and living-as-freedom. Birds chirp jovially, christians whisper the truths of their master, and folks become and be the truth of this fine city. I say truth, but merely mean the actuality of a monday morning in the midst of the final return of the year. God's truth.
There is much feeling of joy, much sentiment of patriotism, and much grit of the american spirit so enumerated by our southern lights on the hilltops. The peaks of excellence are so unencumbered by mediocrity and subservience that even a chicken hawk clucks in the back of the yard.
Women get theirs. Men get women, and industry keeps the getting going good.
The state's republican house, committee, and official offices are mere strides away from my current porchfront location. Everything is set, locked and loaded for an eventual return to the source. The source?
The source is an entity that bequeathes unto all the truth of the Lord and Savior. Life flourishing...
The bell at the Baptist church up the street chimes- the dawn contin
ues to rip folks awake and throw them into the tide of circumstance. Slats clap and signal industry's bold commupance. The fences at the nearby hotel glimmer with golden hue. Cars continue the endless promenade. The YMCA, next to which I am located, sits
in silence... The first day the children at their summercamp return to school.
Monday, August 26, 2013
Thursday, August 22, 2013
Dubious Intent: Why The Left is Caving on Homeland Security
The ideologies of France are well known by some on the Right - in terms of Rousseauian Liberty-as-such and the Po Mo ideology of subjectivism. What is not so well known, were the root intents of these authors - as such - the same goes for the recent Administry's decision to do anything from appointing case defenders to terrorists to the same transparency promised in the '12 U.S. Election.
The intent of this 'transparency' may be good hearted.
The intent of going public with specific apparatus' of Homeland Security may be a necessity.
But, the intent of Obama's administry leaking it's own Security details may prove fatal...
The left, though promulgating the rumor that Barack Obama had to make decisions he wouldn't have made before after learning the secrets of the Oval Office thus undoing many of the things he promised during his two campaigns, has been on the offensive regarding many Security issues for quite some time already.
Though the Regime states it's commitment to transparency, tranparency-of-intent is of far more consequence than pragmatic transparency. The intent of this administration is to stick up for terrorists. To stick up for immigrants. To stick up for the lie of pinkslips for patriots.
We shouldn't allow not only the torrents of immigrants to learn anything about Homeland Security, but ultimately, we shouldn't allow the terrorists to learn of these details, now leaked by mainstream media, either.
The dangerous intent of do-gooders may seem plausable to some - but to others, and of the platform of DDU, it is a brash mistake unless transparency-of-intent is made the lone historical mark of this Administry.
It may seem foolish, but transparency-as-such can be a dubiously rendered strategy in the war on terror.
Let's send Washington a message!
"EMPORER, PLEASE PUT SOME CLOTHES ON!"
The intent of this 'transparency' may be good hearted.
The intent of going public with specific apparatus' of Homeland Security may be a necessity.
But, the intent of Obama's administry leaking it's own Security details may prove fatal...
The left, though promulgating the rumor that Barack Obama had to make decisions he wouldn't have made before after learning the secrets of the Oval Office thus undoing many of the things he promised during his two campaigns, has been on the offensive regarding many Security issues for quite some time already.
Though the Regime states it's commitment to transparency, tranparency-of-intent is of far more consequence than pragmatic transparency. The intent of this administration is to stick up for terrorists. To stick up for immigrants. To stick up for the lie of pinkslips for patriots.
We shouldn't allow not only the torrents of immigrants to learn anything about Homeland Security, but ultimately, we shouldn't allow the terrorists to learn of these details, now leaked by mainstream media, either.
The dangerous intent of do-gooders may seem plausable to some - but to others, and of the platform of DDU, it is a brash mistake unless transparency-of-intent is made the lone historical mark of this Administry.
It may seem foolish, but transparency-as-such can be a dubiously rendered strategy in the war on terror.
Let's send Washington a message!
"EMPORER, PLEASE PUT SOME CLOTHES ON!"
Friday, August 9, 2013
G.O.P. Insists on Courting the Hispanic Vote Despite Vigorous Protest
According to one source in the house on the Democrat side, there are - apparently - 40 to 50 republicans who will vote in favor of legislation for amnesty for illegal immigrants, a pathway to citizenship for Mexicans, and who feel it is a good idea to acquiesce to the now massively overwhelming hispanic vote in the U.S. The narrative for the Republican party is apparently entrenched - they will court the hispanic vote, and forward the legislation voted down in the Senate in the U.S. House.
Despite the supplication of the Senate to it's base on this issue, still, House repubs insist on allying themselves with the Rubio-republicans, feeling little or no remorse for giving up the traditions of the powerhouse that Reagan republicanism inhered upon the nation in the 1980's. They feel no danger of loosing their seats should they pursue this legislation that is ultimately merely an assumed necessity - that is, to court the hispanic vote in lue of their massive population increase within the past decade.
This is a mistake, and one that - owing to the tea party victories in 2010 - could cost many a representative their seat...
The fact is, not only does pursuing the espanola-tounged vote alienate the base of loyal protestant conservative republicans, but it is an all to easily understood failing strategy. The hard fact of the matter is, despite the hispanic Pope's conservative bent - ethnics still and always have voted almost down the line for liberal causes! There is no point, despite number crunchers for the G.O.P.'s assurances to the contrary, in attempting to even address the Mexican immigrant population apart from condemning their illegality.
How is it that so many Mexican's thrive so ardently in the U.S.?
A little known fact: The illegal Marijuana industry.
We shouldn't allow these beasts to dethrone the sovereignty of our party on the basis of raw numbers and facts.
We, as a party - tea or otherwise - should lead from the gut. A gut, and heart, that stays true to the republican ideals of National sovereignty and the traditions of Western Civilization proper.
Brendan O'Connell
Despite the supplication of the Senate to it's base on this issue, still, House repubs insist on allying themselves with the Rubio-republicans, feeling little or no remorse for giving up the traditions of the powerhouse that Reagan republicanism inhered upon the nation in the 1980's. They feel no danger of loosing their seats should they pursue this legislation that is ultimately merely an assumed necessity - that is, to court the hispanic vote in lue of their massive population increase within the past decade.
This is a mistake, and one that - owing to the tea party victories in 2010 - could cost many a representative their seat...
The fact is, not only does pursuing the espanola-tounged vote alienate the base of loyal protestant conservative republicans, but it is an all to easily understood failing strategy. The hard fact of the matter is, despite the hispanic Pope's conservative bent - ethnics still and always have voted almost down the line for liberal causes! There is no point, despite number crunchers for the G.O.P.'s assurances to the contrary, in attempting to even address the Mexican immigrant population apart from condemning their illegality.
How is it that so many Mexican's thrive so ardently in the U.S.?
A little known fact: The illegal Marijuana industry.
We shouldn't allow these beasts to dethrone the sovereignty of our party on the basis of raw numbers and facts.
We, as a party - tea or otherwise - should lead from the gut. A gut, and heart, that stays true to the republican ideals of National sovereignty and the traditions of Western Civilization proper.
Brendan O'Connell
Monday, August 5, 2013
Terror Alert "Red" in U.S. due to Islamic "Chatter"
The news splayed all over the wealthy news bastards television screens on this day of our lord is that U.S. intelligence is gathering evidence that there is the potentiality of an imminent threat to security domestically and abroad. Something along the lines of "the chatter is of kin to that which preceeded 9/11". The scariest thing of all, however, is that whilst proclaiming the security breaches of snowden, manning and ilks' threat to security, they are signalling in all avenues of media their open hand in a dangerous game of poker. A game that requires the finesse of conservatism, and a game that the lib humanist cult shows a glaring ineptness at playing adequately.
Yes, snowden coming forth with insider info about the sick game of, according to the wall street journal today, (paraphrase) "using spyware and trojans as per hackers to infiltrate cell phones and computers to turn them into wireless microphones used for mass surveillance" is the problem.
Conjuring the clown of media to dance in horror at a legitimate terror threat isn't a problem at all.
In fact, that's the only responsible course of action for an administration that relies on the media for it's framing of subjectivist "truth".
Irony is less than apropos.
Let's follow the train of morality here:
Snowden and Manning = leaking info that could result in loss of life due to security breaches.
Lamestream Media = Perfect for disseminating info about the current muslim terror threat.
Public = responsible for disavowing leakers.
Government = leaking SERIOUS security risks directly to CNN and ilk.
Terrorists = probably not literate enough to really figure out meaningful inner workings of security apparatus' from some far removed wiki-something-or-other.
Islam = can easily watch CNN and ilk or watch reporting garnered from CNN and ilk.
Barack Hussein Obama - you can trust one thing... he's really intelligent. He knows what he's doing. He would never commit a major break in protocol due to being in dire need of good ole' FEAR ON A SUNDAY. He knows what's best, and that is to completely misappropriate responsible moral discernment.
Give me a break!
If Manning is really anything other than superman, and snowden is anything less than heroic - at least hold your cards close to your chest in the event of an imminent threat. It's really the only thing a gov'ment could do in these circumstances to lend credibility for persecuting Bradley Manning.
I forgot, no every tom jill and jane jihad knows exactly what they need to to pull of another terror attack simply by watching CNN and ilk... how silly of me.
George W. Bush in his "Decision Points" autobiography makes an important point:
and it runs thus:
"Fear is forgetting."
I can still remember the fear of 9/11. I can still remember the negligence that led to two russian-ethnic muslim students slipping through the cracks of the Obamacare reality show. I can still remember an islamist psychiatrist being allowed to not only reap upon poor troops who, by the way, none of whom have PTSD, but to attack them with heavy weaponry. I can still remember the REAL cause of newtown - the eerie warrantless wiretapping of the mentally ill and right wing.
I can still remember...
But all they want in D.C. is to demean the majesty of innocence-as-such.
All they want is more of the same evolutionary "change".
They forget responsibility.
DDU 2013
Yes, snowden coming forth with insider info about the sick game of, according to the wall street journal today, (paraphrase) "using spyware and trojans as per hackers to infiltrate cell phones and computers to turn them into wireless microphones used for mass surveillance" is the problem.
Conjuring the clown of media to dance in horror at a legitimate terror threat isn't a problem at all.
In fact, that's the only responsible course of action for an administration that relies on the media for it's framing of subjectivist "truth".
Irony is less than apropos.
Let's follow the train of morality here:
Snowden and Manning = leaking info that could result in loss of life due to security breaches.
Lamestream Media = Perfect for disseminating info about the current muslim terror threat.
Public = responsible for disavowing leakers.
Government = leaking SERIOUS security risks directly to CNN and ilk.
Terrorists = probably not literate enough to really figure out meaningful inner workings of security apparatus' from some far removed wiki-something-or-other.
Islam = can easily watch CNN and ilk or watch reporting garnered from CNN and ilk.
Barack Hussein Obama - you can trust one thing... he's really intelligent. He knows what he's doing. He would never commit a major break in protocol due to being in dire need of good ole' FEAR ON A SUNDAY. He knows what's best, and that is to completely misappropriate responsible moral discernment.
Give me a break!
If Manning is really anything other than superman, and snowden is anything less than heroic - at least hold your cards close to your chest in the event of an imminent threat. It's really the only thing a gov'ment could do in these circumstances to lend credibility for persecuting Bradley Manning.
I forgot, no every tom jill and jane jihad knows exactly what they need to to pull of another terror attack simply by watching CNN and ilk... how silly of me.
George W. Bush in his "Decision Points" autobiography makes an important point:
and it runs thus:
"Fear is forgetting."
I can still remember the fear of 9/11. I can still remember the negligence that led to two russian-ethnic muslim students slipping through the cracks of the Obamacare reality show. I can still remember an islamist psychiatrist being allowed to not only reap upon poor troops who, by the way, none of whom have PTSD, but to attack them with heavy weaponry. I can still remember the REAL cause of newtown - the eerie warrantless wiretapping of the mentally ill and right wing.
I can still remember...
But all they want in D.C. is to demean the majesty of innocence-as-such.
All they want is more of the same evolutionary "change".
They forget responsibility.
DDU 2013
Friday, August 2, 2013
DDU and Publik's Calls for Transparency Heeded
I was right again, ahead of the curve again, and leading the charge on the issue of gov'ment transparency regarding warrant-less wiretapping the whole way. Scoffers remain silent, we prefer it that way.
Off the wire today:
"It is worth having a debate over whether there is a better way to do it. Our goal is to get out as much information as we can to provide as much transparency as we can on this."
-Gen. Cole Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Publik outcry against the so-called "phone record collection operation" has grown to such a roar that the dullard's in D.C. are growing less and less capable of ignoring the calls for accountability and oversight. Queen Pelosi has been a proponent of this and other program's, such as wiretapping non-u.s. citizens abroad, necessity. Misses Pelosi only reveals the liberal commitment to an ungodly Orwellian world where responsible oversight and public involvement are rendered mute in her opposition to the recently proposed Amash Amendment in the house. This Amash amendment sought to end altogether the travesty of justice that is the en masse 'collection' of "phone records". Voted down, 217-205, and lead to do so by neo-stazi Queen Pelosi - this amendment would have put a real pathway to stopping big gov'ment agencies from mining rural god-fearing american's private lives for god knows what ends.
Bush knew how to do security.
To see these whiny liberal communist muslim-lovers espouse the importance of national security is almost sickeningly farcical, and the left knows it...
It is almost a farce, except for the, you know, intrinsic fascism of hard left commies with their hands on the wheel of power. I wish, jokingly, that this were something worthy of a joke - but it is not. It is, de facto, a leftist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.
Without a hint of Irony, Queen Pelosi noted (regarding the Amash amendment):
"I was glad it was a big strong vote to send a message..."
Yes main fuhrer, I'm so happy that we can send a message through das big and das strong voten for WIRETAPPING NON-U.S. CITIZENS CELLULAR PHONES.
And the liberal communist cabal on the left side of the aisle decries the injustice of american exceptionalism!
I call for all advocates of democracy and republicanism to send D.C. a message:
"GO THE F*CK HOME"
Off the wire today:
"It is worth having a debate over whether there is a better way to do it. Our goal is to get out as much information as we can to provide as much transparency as we can on this."
-Gen. Cole Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Publik outcry against the so-called "phone record collection operation" has grown to such a roar that the dullard's in D.C. are growing less and less capable of ignoring the calls for accountability and oversight. Queen Pelosi has been a proponent of this and other program's, such as wiretapping non-u.s. citizens abroad, necessity. Misses Pelosi only reveals the liberal commitment to an ungodly Orwellian world where responsible oversight and public involvement are rendered mute in her opposition to the recently proposed Amash Amendment in the house. This Amash amendment sought to end altogether the travesty of justice that is the en masse 'collection' of "phone records". Voted down, 217-205, and lead to do so by neo-stazi Queen Pelosi - this amendment would have put a real pathway to stopping big gov'ment agencies from mining rural god-fearing american's private lives for god knows what ends.
Bush knew how to do security.
To see these whiny liberal communist muslim-lovers espouse the importance of national security is almost sickeningly farcical, and the left knows it...
It is almost a farce, except for the, you know, intrinsic fascism of hard left commies with their hands on the wheel of power. I wish, jokingly, that this were something worthy of a joke - but it is not. It is, de facto, a leftist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.
Without a hint of Irony, Queen Pelosi noted (regarding the Amash amendment):
"I was glad it was a big strong vote to send a message..."
Yes main fuhrer, I'm so happy that we can send a message through das big and das strong voten for WIRETAPPING NON-U.S. CITIZENS CELLULAR PHONES.
And the liberal communist cabal on the left side of the aisle decries the injustice of american exceptionalism!
I call for all advocates of democracy and republicanism to send D.C. a message:
"GO THE F*CK HOME"
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Big District ole' Columbia Targeting Jewish 1 %: Stifling Economy with Redistributionism
Everyone in the know knows that they know that those who know about in-the-know knowledge and wisdom are simply, without a shadow of humility or spirit, members of a monolithic corporate entity. They know that they know - but do these in-the-know proponents of anti-free market resentement know that they fail, without an inkling of recognition regarding the order-as-such, at the level of intuition?
I've heard a decidedly wisen'd adagio from a particularly scientific culturallati one of the classic "will never forget this even on my deathbed" catch-alls of the times: Never trust your first thought. It is wrongheaded to trust the first primordial inkling of an individuals will. Why? I can't imagine, but speculate idly that this sort of evo-revolution typed adagio seeks simply to circumvent the firmament of conscience with a laughably effete "consciousness-as-such".
This evolution of consciousness-as-such is beyond the realm of laughable studied sophistry. It is dangerous.
Take this learned-speak culturallati's grand wizard, B. Hussein 'Bama himself (none other) now overwhelmingly anti-semitic attacks on the jewish constituency of the 1%. A little known fact, ripped from annals of USA Today's Money page - rendered in indeterminacy and made determinate through pic after picture of men with Jewish surnames being hauled off by shadowy agencies of that dark city of D.C.
Why persecute the jews? The Jewish movers and shakers on wallstreet?
Because the ole 'Bama D.C. culturallati are married to implicit anti-semetism, anti-methodist/baptism proper, and anti-free market policy and, obviously, rhetoric. Recall all of the vitriol spouted from a nihilist D.C. propagandist to the cold glaring telemprompter and recapitulated to a herd of low info voters in '12...
Recall all the classico-populist waxing and waning about the 'virtue' of middle class anti-morality.
Recall the venomous name calling toward the 1%.
Recall the implicit and even partly 'transparently rendered' redistributionism, class warfar, and detroit style black militancy.
Now forget all that.
Forget the fear you may have felt.
Forget the thoughts of resentment envy and upward contempt.
Now remember 9/11.
Those same "fat-cat" 1%er industrialist and economic players are, in fact, who were moatly murdered in that event.
Those same "rich jews" were among the fallen.
That same system which Barack Hussein O'Bama is now attacking with all shields down and all swords raised - that same system was the basis of the sacrifice of intervention in the middle east. But I'm goin too far here. I raise not the ire nor recompense in popular zeitgeist - I simply note for god and all eternity that the verifiable anti-semetism of this admin and crony cretin and yae- his counterparts on the terrorist left are one thing:
Prototypical of muslim ideology.
Classically committed, via NASA, to muslim numerology - and, yea:
Probably, in all reality, a con job pulled off by the muslim brotherhood as revenge for the response, dire and dear to me, to 9/11.
If this sounds like a bit of a conspiracy theory, just think of what was said about Mitt and Anne Romney on lamestream news networks and hushed wispers... They're not really people. They're just puppets for capitalism.
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to call this admin and crony thug cabal neomarxist or islamic...
but their constituents, sold into slavery by the D.E.M. (democrat establishment machine) are basically subconsciously bothe marxist and islamic in ideological warrant.
and their actions against the Jewish 1% are prototypical of neo-marxism and islamic intent.
all the whil,
their wit intrinsic remains classically both subversive in a marxist/communism/socialist sense -
AND
Committed, unequivocally (for diplomatic teleology or reasons unforseen) to classico-islamic ideology.
Birtheresque?
perhaps.
But DDU head honch and founder is sending a warning and call to all available born-again christians...
"the IS, unfortunately, the objective possibility that Obama and his crony's and their disciples are a con job staged by the muslim brotherhood as revenge for our, dire and dear, reaction to 9/11. Trouble not your imagination. Waste not a breathe... Discount as conspiracy theorizing. TY"
-Brendan O'Connell of Domestic Democracy United
The year of our lord, 2013 on sundey the 28th of july.
-final fact-
In france, openly jewish semites risk being k-i-l-l-e-d for wearing jewish garb in publik.
I've heard a decidedly wisen'd adagio from a particularly scientific culturallati one of the classic "will never forget this even on my deathbed" catch-alls of the times: Never trust your first thought. It is wrongheaded to trust the first primordial inkling of an individuals will. Why? I can't imagine, but speculate idly that this sort of evo-revolution typed adagio seeks simply to circumvent the firmament of conscience with a laughably effete "consciousness-as-such".
This evolution of consciousness-as-such is beyond the realm of laughable studied sophistry. It is dangerous.
Take this learned-speak culturallati's grand wizard, B. Hussein 'Bama himself (none other) now overwhelmingly anti-semitic attacks on the jewish constituency of the 1%. A little known fact, ripped from annals of USA Today's Money page - rendered in indeterminacy and made determinate through pic after picture of men with Jewish surnames being hauled off by shadowy agencies of that dark city of D.C.
Why persecute the jews? The Jewish movers and shakers on wallstreet?
Because the ole 'Bama D.C. culturallati are married to implicit anti-semetism, anti-methodist/baptism proper, and anti-free market policy and, obviously, rhetoric. Recall all of the vitriol spouted from a nihilist D.C. propagandist to the cold glaring telemprompter and recapitulated to a herd of low info voters in '12...
Recall all the classico-populist waxing and waning about the 'virtue' of middle class anti-morality.
Recall the venomous name calling toward the 1%.
Recall the implicit and even partly 'transparently rendered' redistributionism, class warfar, and detroit style black militancy.
Now forget all that.
Forget the fear you may have felt.
Forget the thoughts of resentment envy and upward contempt.
Now remember 9/11.
Those same "fat-cat" 1%er industrialist and economic players are, in fact, who were moatly murdered in that event.
Those same "rich jews" were among the fallen.
That same system which Barack Hussein O'Bama is now attacking with all shields down and all swords raised - that same system was the basis of the sacrifice of intervention in the middle east. But I'm goin too far here. I raise not the ire nor recompense in popular zeitgeist - I simply note for god and all eternity that the verifiable anti-semetism of this admin and crony cretin and yae- his counterparts on the terrorist left are one thing:
Prototypical of muslim ideology.
Classically committed, via NASA, to muslim numerology - and, yea:
Probably, in all reality, a con job pulled off by the muslim brotherhood as revenge for the response, dire and dear to me, to 9/11.
If this sounds like a bit of a conspiracy theory, just think of what was said about Mitt and Anne Romney on lamestream news networks and hushed wispers... They're not really people. They're just puppets for capitalism.
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to call this admin and crony thug cabal neomarxist or islamic...
but their constituents, sold into slavery by the D.E.M. (democrat establishment machine) are basically subconsciously bothe marxist and islamic in ideological warrant.
and their actions against the Jewish 1% are prototypical of neo-marxism and islamic intent.
all the whil,
their wit intrinsic remains classically both subversive in a marxist/communism/socialist sense -
AND
Committed, unequivocally (for diplomatic teleology or reasons unforseen) to classico-islamic ideology.
Birtheresque?
perhaps.
But DDU head honch and founder is sending a warning and call to all available born-again christians...
"the IS, unfortunately, the objective possibility that Obama and his crony's and their disciples are a con job staged by the muslim brotherhood as revenge for our, dire and dear, reaction to 9/11. Trouble not your imagination. Waste not a breathe... Discount as conspiracy theorizing. TY"
-Brendan O'Connell of Domestic Democracy United
The year of our lord, 2013 on sundey the 28th of july.
-final fact-
In france, openly jewish semites risk being k-i-l-l-e-d for wearing jewish garb in publik.
Thursday, July 18, 2013
NC Issues Major Tax Overhaul: Administration, House and Senate all concur: "Historic"
I'd like to begin my brief exposition by stating the following:
"Tax cuts are important."
"Tax cuts are existential."
"These tax cuts, in my native state NC, are undoubtedly a historic shift in principles."
Why, on the subject of something as basically economic as taxes, would slight, quote, 'savings' be historic? Why would saving approximately 80 dollars a year, as is the case for most in North Carolina's Tax Overhaul, to roughly several thousand for the 10 percent - Why, presumably for most, would we as a state be incapable of sensing the historicity of this shift in priorities via taxation?
Why would this tax cut be, in an acute way, and existential undertaking?
The answer: Due to economics and philosophy's basis in the real world of matter and circumstances, a simple and notably slight decrease in taxation amounts to the realization of ethics-in-form.
Ethics-in-form and, nothing unrestrained, savings for real human beings translates into - en masse - freedom.
Freedom from collectivism.
William F. Buckley Jr. makes the case in his ethic of action-directed typography that is "God and Man at Yale" the case that taxation is, per collectivism, a form of proto-marxism.
Prototypical of collectivistic endeavors to rob freedom of it's determinate formation in the granite of time and pomp. A good prototype of what WE, as Americans, were FLEEING FROM in the 1700's. I.E. - the kingdom tax collector, knocking on doors, identifying economic circumstance, and skimming money off the top of men and women alikes brows... Inside the guts of the deal are linquistic formulations that limit government explicitly and implicitly, overtly and covertly, for itself and in itself.
Taxation IS - De Facto - Collectivism.
Taxation IS - De Facto - State identifying economic circumstance
Taxation IS - De Facto - ignoble.
A DEM said in response to the cuts something along the lines of, "b-b-but funding for state programs will be unable to... to - to extend their reach to as many folks."
I say, I bloody well hope so.
Existentially, everyday North Carolinians will inevitably be on a golden-hued stairway towards living - once agin - in a true democracy-as-such, back to our republic.
Domestic Democracy United supports Gov. McCrory in his decision to make tax cuts his salient, prescient, and (if you've seen him lately) slightly long haired course-toward-freedom in NC's districts, communities, and churches. I say, let them eat cake -
If only Washington D.C. would let them have it.
"Tax cuts are important."
"Tax cuts are existential."
"These tax cuts, in my native state NC, are undoubtedly a historic shift in principles."
Why, on the subject of something as basically economic as taxes, would slight, quote, 'savings' be historic? Why would saving approximately 80 dollars a year, as is the case for most in North Carolina's Tax Overhaul, to roughly several thousand for the 10 percent - Why, presumably for most, would we as a state be incapable of sensing the historicity of this shift in priorities via taxation?
Why would this tax cut be, in an acute way, and existential undertaking?
The answer: Due to economics and philosophy's basis in the real world of matter and circumstances, a simple and notably slight decrease in taxation amounts to the realization of ethics-in-form.
Ethics-in-form and, nothing unrestrained, savings for real human beings translates into - en masse - freedom.
Freedom from collectivism.
William F. Buckley Jr. makes the case in his ethic of action-directed typography that is "God and Man at Yale" the case that taxation is, per collectivism, a form of proto-marxism.
Prototypical of collectivistic endeavors to rob freedom of it's determinate formation in the granite of time and pomp. A good prototype of what WE, as Americans, were FLEEING FROM in the 1700's. I.E. - the kingdom tax collector, knocking on doors, identifying economic circumstance, and skimming money off the top of men and women alikes brows... Inside the guts of the deal are linquistic formulations that limit government explicitly and implicitly, overtly and covertly, for itself and in itself.
Taxation IS - De Facto - Collectivism.
Taxation IS - De Facto - State identifying economic circumstance
Taxation IS - De Facto - ignoble.
A DEM said in response to the cuts something along the lines of, "b-b-but funding for state programs will be unable to... to - to extend their reach to as many folks."
I say, I bloody well hope so.
Existentially, everyday North Carolinians will inevitably be on a golden-hued stairway towards living - once agin - in a true democracy-as-such, back to our republic.
Domestic Democracy United supports Gov. McCrory in his decision to make tax cuts his salient, prescient, and (if you've seen him lately) slightly long haired course-toward-freedom in NC's districts, communities, and churches. I say, let them eat cake -
If only Washington D.C. would let them have it.
Sunday, July 14, 2013
Obama on Zimmerman: :Trayvon "would look like his son if he had one" : : Officially endorses Communism
Not that it is at all telling for a President who is known to be a socialist to endorse communism in his explicitly attested "spirit", however -
Barack Obama has likened, schizophrenically enough, the son he "would have had" or some such delusion to have "looked like travon"; hence, irrevocably revoking his commitment to christian spirit.
Trayvon's type, a gangbanger, would have hardly have believed in and worshiped the lord....
Devil worship is, undoubtedly, a central tenant of gang culture. They very often espouse the virtues of the "Grim Reaper", explicitly. Think of the last grim reaper picture from an early nineties gangsta rap album if you will. It's a specific part of the communist conspiracy, which is in today's age explicitly - gang crime.
The italian mob, the irish mob, the whatever the hell else mob are forms of communism. They are not, even far from being examples of lack of commitment to the U.S., committed to the lord our savior or it's foundation in sovereignty. They ARE the arm of the commie conspiracy.
...And by Mr. Hussein and his regime endorsing and backing this young disciple of not merely rap/club/urban culture but "gang-culture-as-such", their credentials as defender's of liberty, the eternal order, and yea justice itself is dethroned officially. Recognized officially as communism.
Not surprising coming from a lawyer for the touchy subject of Acorn.
They were shut down in late-2000's for illegally traffiking underage sexual slaves.
But you won't find that in annals of time, the 'village voice" and their representatives within the now direly substance void psycho-sphere.
All you'll find is, depending on your district, the liberal hoarde shoving a hoarde of liberals throats with lies.
Obfuscation was never a strength of the jounralism of yonder lore,
Yet the truth of jesus is gone from the public narrative.
In it's place, by dictates from the right, is the language of tyranny. The shackles of class warfare from the 99 percent. The resentement of the sub- and proto- slaves under the spell of ideology.
Barack Obama has likened, schizophrenically enough, the son he "would have had" or some such delusion to have "looked like travon"; hence, irrevocably revoking his commitment to christian spirit.
Trayvon's type, a gangbanger, would have hardly have believed in and worshiped the lord....
Devil worship is, undoubtedly, a central tenant of gang culture. They very often espouse the virtues of the "Grim Reaper", explicitly. Think of the last grim reaper picture from an early nineties gangsta rap album if you will. It's a specific part of the communist conspiracy, which is in today's age explicitly - gang crime.
The italian mob, the irish mob, the whatever the hell else mob are forms of communism. They are not, even far from being examples of lack of commitment to the U.S., committed to the lord our savior or it's foundation in sovereignty. They ARE the arm of the commie conspiracy.
...And by Mr. Hussein and his regime endorsing and backing this young disciple of not merely rap/club/urban culture but "gang-culture-as-such", their credentials as defender's of liberty, the eternal order, and yea justice itself is dethroned officially. Recognized officially as communism.
Not surprising coming from a lawyer for the touchy subject of Acorn.
They were shut down in late-2000's for illegally traffiking underage sexual slaves.
But you won't find that in annals of time, the 'village voice" and their representatives within the now direly substance void psycho-sphere.
All you'll find is, depending on your district, the liberal hoarde shoving a hoarde of liberals throats with lies.
Obfuscation was never a strength of the jounralism of yonder lore,
Yet the truth of jesus is gone from the public narrative.
In it's place, by dictates from the right, is the language of tyranny. The shackles of class warfare from the 99 percent. The resentement of the sub- and proto- slaves under the spell of ideology.
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Sarah Palin Says on Hannity: "Snowden is Not The Problem, The Government is the Problem."
Recently I was fortunate to hear a timely broadcast from Tea Party leader Sarah Palin during the long commute from Raleigh NC to the country. In it she said a number of things that were shocking, well pointed and said eloquently despite the media's presentation of her as a conservative bimbo, and all to prescient for the republican party as such.
Among the statements from Sarah Palin this week:
(paraphrase)
"While not my first choice, we should create a third party - a 'freedom party' - if the republican party continues to fail it's constituency."
"I was happy that in 2010 and 2012 I was able to lend credence to and get elected many tea party candidates simply by endorsing them, I feel fortunate to be in that position."
"Cocktail party republicans are just as bad as democrats."
"Edward Snowden is the not the problem, the government is the problem with its unconstitutional wiretapping."
These were all startling admissions from who, in my opinion second only to Michelle Bachmann, is the leading voice of the Tea Party.
I should note that I would not so blithely regurgitate some paraphrases from a radio broadcast were it not for just how prescient these remarks are. Amongst other things, they solidly showed her dedication to being a rogue voice for the path to Liberty in America. This path is, decidedly and oddly enough, being ignored by the R.I.N.O.'s and the fascist regime of Mr. Hussein Obama. Why they are deciding to, as Bachmann said on Glenn Beck this week, literally destroy the republican party through this "pathway to citizenship" malarkey for Hispanics is beyond comprehension to this countryboy conserve. It's a fact that should the Gang of Eight succeed, the republican party will be in roughshod position for potentially the rest of history!
But yes, yes... the dirty word: Snowden.
I think many repubs and dems are, by way of the growingly odd American collectivist mindset, compelled to disavow Snowden out of some growing compulsion toward fascism. Those who decried the FEMA Camp-danger are quickly, in many's opinion, are being proven to be anything other than kooks and as is often leveled at these types, far from dystopian-minded fanatics.
The fact is, the - let's just say "air quality" in the former U.S.A. is probably on par with about the atmosphere preceeding the execution of "unemployables and the mentally ill" during the holocaust.
I'm not saying we're in imminent danger, but accountability and transparency on governmental fail-safe's for these types of eventualities is, in the opin' of Domestic Democracy United, probably the most important topic for open discussion in avenues of public communications. Why? Well, because when Christianity, Philosophy, Liberty, Autonomy, Sovereignty etc. are literally expelled from the former U.S.'s veins upon recognition by the Demonic spirit of the times, then you can see how everything can snowball quickly should the bomb hit.
I say this with due knowledge of the lack of respectability this position entails...
But think of it.
The public almost universally barked in unison:
"Snowden?"
"HANG HIM!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like to, as my superpac/non-profit foundation Domestic Democracy United's head, like to make some brief statements of position regarding the controversy of Snowden and leaker's etc.
1) Snowden is not the problem, lack of transparency is. I recall Mr. Hussein Obama - pre "Dronekiller War Lord" era presidential leadership, speaking and indeed getting elected on the promise of "transparency". Many acknowledge this as say - well, he went from everyday guy to knowing all of the secrets of the oval office and realized... you, know. This may well be the case, but he was elected with an important part of his platform dedicated to "transparency". If the government would end this Obamacare reality show and just talk openly about facts, there would be no need to leak anything. THIS would put an end to leakers feeling compelled to share government secrets alone and in itself. I understand this is idealistic, but now that our enemies knowe - can't at least WE?
2) Most American's support homeland security. Shouldn't we reward their support with clear and logical evidence? Must the media obfuscate rather than reveal the important and relevant actions of homeland security? If so, ask yourself "why?" My position to the answer of "why?" is because the actions, out of compassion-understander George Bush's control, of homeland security are simply to evil minded to tell the public openly.
3) Snowden is heroic in a sense, period. He may not be advantageous to U.S. interest, but one thing is clear - he really does believe he is a patriot and doing a patriotic thing for people.
4) Most anti-snowden sentiment is intentional and violent minded ignorance. This kind of sentiment is, according to DDU, "of" the "spirit" of the "Holocaust". Not kidding.
5) I have been facing severe sanctioning, personally, for my words on this blog. I have been collectivistically "mitigated". I feel, often, upon the verge of giving in, giving up due to their attacks. I will not. I won't give up fighting for freedom because I believe it is important. More important than work, play, scholasticism, and yea - even music.
Saying that - Many of you international readers may like to hear some of the official compositions of DDU. Clip & Carbine - SOUNDCLOUD LINK!
My purpose with these compositions in a ragga piece is to spread the word of god through music.
I have been composing under the name "Clip & Carbine" for nearly 10 or 11 years, and have been massively successful on an international scale with my brand.
Clip & Carbine is about one thing: The second amendment.
Sarah Palin understands the second amendment in a way no one else does. The tea party understands the second amendment in a way no one else does. The NRA, by which Clip & Carbine has been unofficially endorsed, understands the second amendment in a way no one else does.
Gabby Giffords, in her parading around as victim-hero in order to limit second amendment rights does not understand.
With this final statement and second link to what, in all reality is good music to smoke a join to, I come to a close: What "Snowden is leaking", whatever in reality "that" is - the problem he is addressing is ultimately what cause the Newtown, Aurora, and many other shootings. Guaranteed.
DOMESTIC DEMOCRACY UNITED 7/12/2013 live in Capitol City.
LISTEN TO TEA PARTY LEADER's "CLIP & CARBINE" - 11 years running
Among the statements from Sarah Palin this week:
(paraphrase)
"While not my first choice, we should create a third party - a 'freedom party' - if the republican party continues to fail it's constituency."
"I was happy that in 2010 and 2012 I was able to lend credence to and get elected many tea party candidates simply by endorsing them, I feel fortunate to be in that position."
"Cocktail party republicans are just as bad as democrats."
"Edward Snowden is the not the problem, the government is the problem with its unconstitutional wiretapping."
These were all startling admissions from who, in my opinion second only to Michelle Bachmann, is the leading voice of the Tea Party.
I should note that I would not so blithely regurgitate some paraphrases from a radio broadcast were it not for just how prescient these remarks are. Amongst other things, they solidly showed her dedication to being a rogue voice for the path to Liberty in America. This path is, decidedly and oddly enough, being ignored by the R.I.N.O.'s and the fascist regime of Mr. Hussein Obama. Why they are deciding to, as Bachmann said on Glenn Beck this week, literally destroy the republican party through this "pathway to citizenship" malarkey for Hispanics is beyond comprehension to this countryboy conserve. It's a fact that should the Gang of Eight succeed, the republican party will be in roughshod position for potentially the rest of history!
But yes, yes... the dirty word: Snowden.
I think many repubs and dems are, by way of the growingly odd American collectivist mindset, compelled to disavow Snowden out of some growing compulsion toward fascism. Those who decried the FEMA Camp-danger are quickly, in many's opinion, are being proven to be anything other than kooks and as is often leveled at these types, far from dystopian-minded fanatics.
The fact is, the - let's just say "air quality" in the former U.S.A. is probably on par with about the atmosphere preceeding the execution of "unemployables and the mentally ill" during the holocaust.
I'm not saying we're in imminent danger, but accountability and transparency on governmental fail-safe's for these types of eventualities is, in the opin' of Domestic Democracy United, probably the most important topic for open discussion in avenues of public communications. Why? Well, because when Christianity, Philosophy, Liberty, Autonomy, Sovereignty etc. are literally expelled from the former U.S.'s veins upon recognition by the Demonic spirit of the times, then you can see how everything can snowball quickly should the bomb hit.
I say this with due knowledge of the lack of respectability this position entails...
But think of it.
The public almost universally barked in unison:
"Snowden?"
"HANG HIM!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like to, as my superpac/non-profit foundation Domestic Democracy United's head, like to make some brief statements of position regarding the controversy of Snowden and leaker's etc.
1) Snowden is not the problem, lack of transparency is. I recall Mr. Hussein Obama - pre "Dronekiller War Lord" era presidential leadership, speaking and indeed getting elected on the promise of "transparency". Many acknowledge this as say - well, he went from everyday guy to knowing all of the secrets of the oval office and realized... you, know. This may well be the case, but he was elected with an important part of his platform dedicated to "transparency". If the government would end this Obamacare reality show and just talk openly about facts, there would be no need to leak anything. THIS would put an end to leakers feeling compelled to share government secrets alone and in itself. I understand this is idealistic, but now that our enemies knowe - can't at least WE?
2) Most American's support homeland security. Shouldn't we reward their support with clear and logical evidence? Must the media obfuscate rather than reveal the important and relevant actions of homeland security? If so, ask yourself "why?" My position to the answer of "why?" is because the actions, out of compassion-understander George Bush's control, of homeland security are simply to evil minded to tell the public openly.
3) Snowden is heroic in a sense, period. He may not be advantageous to U.S. interest, but one thing is clear - he really does believe he is a patriot and doing a patriotic thing for people.
4) Most anti-snowden sentiment is intentional and violent minded ignorance. This kind of sentiment is, according to DDU, "of" the "spirit" of the "Holocaust". Not kidding.
5) I have been facing severe sanctioning, personally, for my words on this blog. I have been collectivistically "mitigated". I feel, often, upon the verge of giving in, giving up due to their attacks. I will not. I won't give up fighting for freedom because I believe it is important. More important than work, play, scholasticism, and yea - even music.
Saying that - Many of you international readers may like to hear some of the official compositions of DDU. Clip & Carbine - SOUNDCLOUD LINK!
My purpose with these compositions in a ragga piece is to spread the word of god through music.
I have been composing under the name "Clip & Carbine" for nearly 10 or 11 years, and have been massively successful on an international scale with my brand.
Clip & Carbine is about one thing: The second amendment.
Sarah Palin understands the second amendment in a way no one else does. The tea party understands the second amendment in a way no one else does. The NRA, by which Clip & Carbine has been unofficially endorsed, understands the second amendment in a way no one else does.
Gabby Giffords, in her parading around as victim-hero in order to limit second amendment rights does not understand.
With this final statement and second link to what, in all reality is good music to smoke a join to, I come to a close: What "Snowden is leaking", whatever in reality "that" is - the problem he is addressing is ultimately what cause the Newtown, Aurora, and many other shootings. Guaranteed.
DOMESTIC DEMOCRACY UNITED 7/12/2013 live in Capitol City.
LISTEN TO TEA PARTY LEADER's "CLIP & CARBINE" - 11 years running
Tuesday, July 9, 2013
A Liberals Word is Worth Nothing: Why Not To Trust Leftists
Liberal ideology often prides itself on being the foremost of scientific prowess and ingenuity, yet the "word" of the left is often far from being capable of holding these titles in terms of legitimacy of opin' and rigor of rhetoric. More often than not, their ideological basis in criminality and lack of intellectual foundation hides a dedication to lack of merit regarding the sanctity of their position-as-such. They oft' espouse integrity, yet find themselves encumbered by a lack of it. They oft' espouse sovereignty on the basis of philosophy, yet go on to persecute this kind of dialectic in practice. They oft' talk of "for the people" ideology, yet undermine personhood on a constant basis.
To ask a liberal, "to what extent is your word worth your act" - is to proffer a dialectic of reason, to a degree.
To ask a liberal, "how much do you hold to your ideals" - is to question the certitude of the leftist ideological underpinning.
To ask a liberal, "what is your promise of sanctity worth" - is to, at a basic level, reveal their own narcissistic atheism through result of act, deed, and worth.
A liberal who speaks necessarily lies about their commitment to deed, action, and purpose. The purpose of liberalism is implicitly to lie about their intentionality. That is the basis of the liberal adherence to atheism. They will simply tell the judeo-christian culture of heavenly adherence whatever they wish, to the end result of hell-bound slave-morality.
They will simply tell all christian culture - "look... we believe in you. We believe, even, what you believe. Just give us an inch... For if you don't, well... You are one of them."
We shouldn't give them an inch.
We shouldn't allow their slave morality to undermine our Christianity.
All we should do is fight against their slave morality tooth and nail.
Because, I'll have you know, slave morality degrades not only the sanctity of reason and the abstract nature of being-as-such. Slave morality degrades the very foundation upon that which was fought and died for has stood upon. Degradation in this respect is the sole constituent of the leftist cause. Bring everything to the rot of it's own.
But we can do something about it...
We can remember, a slaves liberal morality is never worth anything.
We can remember that a slaves liberal virtue is nothing more than a lie,
We can remember that the words of the left are nothing but empty circumstance.
And we can remember that a liberals word is worth nothing.
If you ask a liberal to give you their word, you can trust in one thing. Not that it will be profound, which it is not. Not that it will be humanitarian, which it is not.
You can trust that it will be false. That it will be a lie. That it will be nothing more than pushing you further towards their ends with no recompense.
You can trust this till the day you die.
For to be a liberal is to live, and BE, a lie. To be a liberal is to believe in and succumb to a lie. To be a liberal is to live in service of a lie.
To be a CHRISTIAN, is a far differance.
RT
To ask a liberal, "to what extent is your word worth your act" - is to proffer a dialectic of reason, to a degree.
To ask a liberal, "how much do you hold to your ideals" - is to question the certitude of the leftist ideological underpinning.
To ask a liberal, "what is your promise of sanctity worth" - is to, at a basic level, reveal their own narcissistic atheism through result of act, deed, and worth.
A liberal who speaks necessarily lies about their commitment to deed, action, and purpose. The purpose of liberalism is implicitly to lie about their intentionality. That is the basis of the liberal adherence to atheism. They will simply tell the judeo-christian culture of heavenly adherence whatever they wish, to the end result of hell-bound slave-morality.
They will simply tell all christian culture - "look... we believe in you. We believe, even, what you believe. Just give us an inch... For if you don't, well... You are one of them."
We shouldn't give them an inch.
We shouldn't allow their slave morality to undermine our Christianity.
All we should do is fight against their slave morality tooth and nail.
Because, I'll have you know, slave morality degrades not only the sanctity of reason and the abstract nature of being-as-such. Slave morality degrades the very foundation upon that which was fought and died for has stood upon. Degradation in this respect is the sole constituent of the leftist cause. Bring everything to the rot of it's own.
But we can do something about it...
We can remember, a slaves liberal morality is never worth anything.
We can remember that a slaves liberal virtue is nothing more than a lie,
We can remember that the words of the left are nothing but empty circumstance.
And we can remember that a liberals word is worth nothing.
If you ask a liberal to give you their word, you can trust in one thing. Not that it will be profound, which it is not. Not that it will be humanitarian, which it is not.
You can trust that it will be false. That it will be a lie. That it will be nothing more than pushing you further towards their ends with no recompense.
You can trust this till the day you die.
For to be a liberal is to live, and BE, a lie. To be a liberal is to believe in and succumb to a lie. To be a liberal is to live in service of a lie.
To be a CHRISTIAN, is a far differance.
RT
Wednesday, July 3, 2013
NC Senate Passes Hardline Abortion Reforms
Today in the North Carolina Senate legislation was passed making it tougher for people in this state to get abortions. The legislation will go on to the house next week, and will ultimately end up on Gov. McCrory's desk for approval or veto.
First off, abortion is murder. You are more than free to argue otherwise, but as I've always said - the ill effects of the counter argument, abortion is NOT murder, weighs far less in terms of liability and resultant consequence than if my, and more importantly OUR, position proves to be true in light of history. For example, if abortion is NOT murder then there will simply be more fornicators with little babies to take care of. No small deed to be sure, but that is the ramification of legislation in regards to the "right to choice" platform.
If abortion IS murder... well, I'll leave it to you to make the moral equivalence.
The real story here, however, is our Gov. McCrory's reaction to the Senate's decision.
McCrory said last year, on the record, that he would veto ANY further legislation making it more difficult for people to obtain abortions. This should give the whiner's on the left some cause for comfort, though I hold little hope that his tenacity of moderate opin' will even be noted by those forever sneering conservo belittlers.
Further, he actually went so far as to actively criticize and rebuke the republican held Senate for slamming this legislation through, saying - paraphrase - "it is all to akin to the manner of a Democrat Senate".
Harsh words, once again, from our Governor.
Whether or not this legislation receives a veto upon passage in the house is, to me, beside the point. Ultimately, the conservative demeanor that spawned this very legislation itself will force the Charlotteir Gov. to do the will of his compatriots in the capitol city. Anything other than a signature by the Gov. to this legislation would be, to put it lightly, a very obtuse undertaking.
But if you are, say, a "women's rights" proponent, activist, or sympathizer - I merely ask you to remember that the wages of sin are death. The wages of responsibility? Well, merely giving towards that which ultimately may be other than convenient to your lifestyle.
Think of it, if you will, in terms of utilitarian philosophy. I.E. - More pleasure = More Virtue. More Pain = Less Virtue.
How many women can you find who espouse the beauty of rearing and, yea- giving birth to a child? "Miracle of Life" and all of that?
How many ill begotten pregnancies ending in the MURDER OF A BABY are remembered by those who took part in it with bitterness, tears, and brutal memories of the unnatural?
I doubt anyone can refute this logic.
As is normally the case for utilitarianism.
But let us not forget that this legislation, JUST PASSED IN THE SENATE, not only comes from a genuine source of North Carolinian grit - but does not, as many may argue, stigmatize those who receive abortions.
This legislation is far from a witch hunt for those who have premarital sex.
It is, in fact, a perfect nuance on an already established position of our towns, our states, and our party.
DDU urges Mr. McCrory to remember that the penultimate power in NC comes from not the executive or judiciary - but from the sovereign halls of the capital city. McCrory, upon near promised passage through the house, should not hesitate when time comes for his fine and honorable penmanship to make the mark that further decreases what I think is appropriately termed "MURDER".
RT Stillwell
First off, abortion is murder. You are more than free to argue otherwise, but as I've always said - the ill effects of the counter argument, abortion is NOT murder, weighs far less in terms of liability and resultant consequence than if my, and more importantly OUR, position proves to be true in light of history. For example, if abortion is NOT murder then there will simply be more fornicators with little babies to take care of. No small deed to be sure, but that is the ramification of legislation in regards to the "right to choice" platform.
If abortion IS murder... well, I'll leave it to you to make the moral equivalence.
The real story here, however, is our Gov. McCrory's reaction to the Senate's decision.
McCrory said last year, on the record, that he would veto ANY further legislation making it more difficult for people to obtain abortions. This should give the whiner's on the left some cause for comfort, though I hold little hope that his tenacity of moderate opin' will even be noted by those forever sneering conservo belittlers.
Further, he actually went so far as to actively criticize and rebuke the republican held Senate for slamming this legislation through, saying - paraphrase - "it is all to akin to the manner of a Democrat Senate".
Harsh words, once again, from our Governor.
Whether or not this legislation receives a veto upon passage in the house is, to me, beside the point. Ultimately, the conservative demeanor that spawned this very legislation itself will force the Charlotteir Gov. to do the will of his compatriots in the capitol city. Anything other than a signature by the Gov. to this legislation would be, to put it lightly, a very obtuse undertaking.
But if you are, say, a "women's rights" proponent, activist, or sympathizer - I merely ask you to remember that the wages of sin are death. The wages of responsibility? Well, merely giving towards that which ultimately may be other than convenient to your lifestyle.
Think of it, if you will, in terms of utilitarian philosophy. I.E. - More pleasure = More Virtue. More Pain = Less Virtue.
How many women can you find who espouse the beauty of rearing and, yea- giving birth to a child? "Miracle of Life" and all of that?
How many ill begotten pregnancies ending in the MURDER OF A BABY are remembered by those who took part in it with bitterness, tears, and brutal memories of the unnatural?
I doubt anyone can refute this logic.
As is normally the case for utilitarianism.
But let us not forget that this legislation, JUST PASSED IN THE SENATE, not only comes from a genuine source of North Carolinian grit - but does not, as many may argue, stigmatize those who receive abortions.
This legislation is far from a witch hunt for those who have premarital sex.
It is, in fact, a perfect nuance on an already established position of our towns, our states, and our party.
DDU urges Mr. McCrory to remember that the penultimate power in NC comes from not the executive or judiciary - but from the sovereign halls of the capital city. McCrory, upon near promised passage through the house, should not hesitate when time comes for his fine and honorable penmanship to make the mark that further decreases what I think is appropriately termed "MURDER".
RT Stillwell
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Traditional Definition of Marriage Under Attack
Today the supreme court overruled California's laws defining marriage as between a man and a woman exclusively.
It's remarkable that those who have taken a stand on marriage and its definition as between a single man and a single woman have now, according to the supreme court today, become nothing more than "bigots". It is remarkable for the following reason: Those who have stood up for the bible are now nothing more than some adage decided by vicious leftists who generally hold views not altogether favorable towards tradition, the U.S., and religion itself.
It amounts to hate speech!
If you, as a christian, stand up for biblical values - you are no longer a human. You are just a bigot. A racist. A fascist. A conformist.
Hate speech is defined according to the world community as referring to humans as something non-human. For example, the former President of Iran referring to jews as "cockroaches". By this definition, defining christians who stand up and defend traditional marriage as "bigots" seems to me to be akin to this type of hate speech, functionally.
I'm no longer a christian with deep and philosophical beliefs regarding morality... no, I'm just a "bigot" and anything else non-members of the club of "cool" are defined to be. I'm no longer virtuous or honorable or an important contributor to our culture. I'm now, according to the activist judges in the supreme court merely an inhuman, subhuman, non-human person filled with hate against a minority.
The irony is, we are being accused of hate speech on the right - yet the left, in terms of "soft" hate speech is far more guilty of this new way of marginalizing and defaming people on the basis of language and generalizations. We have been accused, as of today, of being "bigots" by the supreme court. They, to a point, have dismissed any rational reasoned argument from the right on the basis of our subhuman "bigotry".
"They want to impugn homosexuality"
- the supreme court (paraphrase)
In fact, upon permanently defining marriage in its traditional sense in my state of North Carolina the air waves were rife with conservo's saying pretty much the following: "WE are not against gays. WE believe that gays are okay. It is GOD who condemns homosexuality."
...and they said it nicely!
But the fact is, gay rights is a stumbling block for the traditions of America and, yea - the world.
My personal thesis is that the supreme court is reacting, to a degree, against the harshly totalitarian laws in Russia against homosexuality - where it is a crime to even acknowledge that homo's exist. With the trouble in syria and the conflict with Russia there increasingly becoming a problem, and increasingly being blacked out of the lamestream media, the supreme court must see their attack on traditional marriage today as a way of standing up to totalitarianism.
What they fail to realize in their dark little bubble of D.C. is that this is not a sociological issue, but an anthropological/cultural one. A culture defines what it approves of and doesn't, and it is not the role of a group of former lawyers isolated in the District of Columbia to decide for ANYONE what it should do regarding such minute and delicate cultural preferences as the definition of marriage.
The fact is, we define marriage as it has been for thousands of years. According to biblical principles.
But the supreme court has overstepped its bounds. Let's just hope they don't aim their sights on NC, where we have upheld the traditional definition as between a man and a woman in our constitution.
It's remarkable that those who have taken a stand on marriage and its definition as between a single man and a single woman have now, according to the supreme court today, become nothing more than "bigots". It is remarkable for the following reason: Those who have stood up for the bible are now nothing more than some adage decided by vicious leftists who generally hold views not altogether favorable towards tradition, the U.S., and religion itself.
It amounts to hate speech!
If you, as a christian, stand up for biblical values - you are no longer a human. You are just a bigot. A racist. A fascist. A conformist.
Hate speech is defined according to the world community as referring to humans as something non-human. For example, the former President of Iran referring to jews as "cockroaches". By this definition, defining christians who stand up and defend traditional marriage as "bigots" seems to me to be akin to this type of hate speech, functionally.
I'm no longer a christian with deep and philosophical beliefs regarding morality... no, I'm just a "bigot" and anything else non-members of the club of "cool" are defined to be. I'm no longer virtuous or honorable or an important contributor to our culture. I'm now, according to the activist judges in the supreme court merely an inhuman, subhuman, non-human person filled with hate against a minority.
The irony is, we are being accused of hate speech on the right - yet the left, in terms of "soft" hate speech is far more guilty of this new way of marginalizing and defaming people on the basis of language and generalizations. We have been accused, as of today, of being "bigots" by the supreme court. They, to a point, have dismissed any rational reasoned argument from the right on the basis of our subhuman "bigotry".
"They want to impugn homosexuality"
- the supreme court (paraphrase)
In fact, upon permanently defining marriage in its traditional sense in my state of North Carolina the air waves were rife with conservo's saying pretty much the following: "WE are not against gays. WE believe that gays are okay. It is GOD who condemns homosexuality."
...and they said it nicely!
But the fact is, gay rights is a stumbling block for the traditions of America and, yea - the world.
My personal thesis is that the supreme court is reacting, to a degree, against the harshly totalitarian laws in Russia against homosexuality - where it is a crime to even acknowledge that homo's exist. With the trouble in syria and the conflict with Russia there increasingly becoming a problem, and increasingly being blacked out of the lamestream media, the supreme court must see their attack on traditional marriage today as a way of standing up to totalitarianism.
What they fail to realize in their dark little bubble of D.C. is that this is not a sociological issue, but an anthropological/cultural one. A culture defines what it approves of and doesn't, and it is not the role of a group of former lawyers isolated in the District of Columbia to decide for ANYONE what it should do regarding such minute and delicate cultural preferences as the definition of marriage.
The fact is, we define marriage as it has been for thousands of years. According to biblical principles.
But the supreme court has overstepped its bounds. Let's just hope they don't aim their sights on NC, where we have upheld the traditional definition as between a man and a woman in our constitution.
Friday, June 21, 2013
Marco Rubio is Destroying America: Why the Repub Party Needs to Exile R.I.N.O.'s
Compromise on immigration seems to be the current path to reforming the waves of illegal hispanics in the senate. Muckrakers would make a fuss about the amendment, agreed to on both sides of the aisle initially, that prohibited any action until the border is secure, but this is beside the point altogether. The lone fact is - Marco Rubio is a R.I.N.O. or republican in name only.
His "reform" seems to be nothing more than ushering even more immigrants into our dear country on the basis of his nostalgic RNC speech: more American dream for immigrants and sons of an immigrant like himself. Personally, I believe his credentials to be not altogether vetted properly by the party. Rubio's involvement with his nation of origin, Cuba, has not sufficiently been investigated; and DDU calls on the republican party proper to inquir into how genuine of a repub Rubio actually is. I mean this literally.
You see, ever since the term "Compassionate Conservativism" was coined in a fit of genius, those not even coming close to being actual conservative republicans have attempted to defame the legacy of reagan and all of his cold war splendor by positing a kinder, gentler conservatism. Basically, without going into too much detail, the politics of pre-meditative compromise to the left.
Why should we compromise? Why can't at least an effort to build fences succeed?
Because, I would wager, some number cruncher in the G.O.P. has a penchant for fiscal conservatism and the strength of "cowboy export". I.E. - some dullard who sincerely lacks belief in creationism or other related theories believes, in his heart of liberal bleeding hearts, that bue to the complete inability of anyone to stop the inflow of hispanics into our country, the former USA, that the G.O.P. must stoop to the immigrant hoardes. Probably due to the pervasiveness of "tolerance" and "evolution of culture", the egghead weenies in washington think, unequivocally, that we should welcome these non-natives "infrastructure".
It is the opin' of DOMESTIC DEMOCRACY UNITED that we ought to, en' mass as a republic, deport all of them who come here illegally.
For it is due to the myth that jobs taken by low wage immigrants are undesirable to natives of OUR country that we make such ignoble and untimely compromises.
Those compromises such as offering hispanic immigrants subsidized healthcare. That we should welcome them into our communities. That we need to change all infrastructure to stoop to their little brown level and force godfearing christians to hear some kind of cheap blooded demon speak.
Marco Rubio - GO BACK TO CUBA
His "reform" seems to be nothing more than ushering even more immigrants into our dear country on the basis of his nostalgic RNC speech: more American dream for immigrants and sons of an immigrant like himself. Personally, I believe his credentials to be not altogether vetted properly by the party. Rubio's involvement with his nation of origin, Cuba, has not sufficiently been investigated; and DDU calls on the republican party proper to inquir into how genuine of a repub Rubio actually is. I mean this literally.
You see, ever since the term "Compassionate Conservativism" was coined in a fit of genius, those not even coming close to being actual conservative republicans have attempted to defame the legacy of reagan and all of his cold war splendor by positing a kinder, gentler conservatism. Basically, without going into too much detail, the politics of pre-meditative compromise to the left.
Why should we compromise? Why can't at least an effort to build fences succeed?
Because, I would wager, some number cruncher in the G.O.P. has a penchant for fiscal conservatism and the strength of "cowboy export". I.E. - some dullard who sincerely lacks belief in creationism or other related theories believes, in his heart of liberal bleeding hearts, that bue to the complete inability of anyone to stop the inflow of hispanics into our country, the former USA, that the G.O.P. must stoop to the immigrant hoardes. Probably due to the pervasiveness of "tolerance" and "evolution of culture", the egghead weenies in washington think, unequivocally, that we should welcome these non-natives "infrastructure".
It is the opin' of DOMESTIC DEMOCRACY UNITED that we ought to, en' mass as a republic, deport all of them who come here illegally.
For it is due to the myth that jobs taken by low wage immigrants are undesirable to natives of OUR country that we make such ignoble and untimely compromises.
Those compromises such as offering hispanic immigrants subsidized healthcare. That we should welcome them into our communities. That we need to change all infrastructure to stoop to their little brown level and force godfearing christians to hear some kind of cheap blooded demon speak.
Marco Rubio - GO BACK TO CUBA
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
NC's "Farm Bill": Populism Hiding Redistributionism
Recently, a bill was proposed in North Carolina that is a perfect example of everything wrong with populism. For those that don't know, "Populism", better known as pandering with a perfectly crafted southern accent, is an evil ideology that literally fleeces the south of its heritage proper.
This bill, which is nothing more than an expanse of food stamps for blacks and (especially) latinos, actually has the decidedly convincing veneer of being at all related to farming and agriculture. It is not. Maybe 20 percent of the bill is applicable. The remainder is simply part of the tug of war over providing free food for non-whites.
The proposed legislation wouldn't be so offensively grotesque were it not for the fact that it's being sold to carpet-bagger's and universalist christian's alike as a noble "juss' helpin the farmer" sentiment whilst hiding a decidedly redistributionist policy. It seeks to provide millions free food. Free food provided by the fat skimmed off of the top of other's and industry's wealth.
If this at all sounds problematic, it isn't.
It's merely big Washington Democrat Establishment machinery being shoved down the southern christian populous's throat. What isn't so apparent, is that not only is the DEM constituency pro Farm Bill for laughable reasons, but they are (as low information voters) entirely oblivious as to the contents of the legislation. Ask your fellow DEM about the substance of the bill, and all of them will reply something other than to do with Food Stamps.
NC will deny the bill passage, but the insult of populism remains. Talking southern may buy vote's, but being disingenuous in order to advance a streamlined big government agenda doesn't. It buys contempt.
This bill, which is nothing more than an expanse of food stamps for blacks and (especially) latinos, actually has the decidedly convincing veneer of being at all related to farming and agriculture. It is not. Maybe 20 percent of the bill is applicable. The remainder is simply part of the tug of war over providing free food for non-whites.
The proposed legislation wouldn't be so offensively grotesque were it not for the fact that it's being sold to carpet-bagger's and universalist christian's alike as a noble "juss' helpin the farmer" sentiment whilst hiding a decidedly redistributionist policy. It seeks to provide millions free food. Free food provided by the fat skimmed off of the top of other's and industry's wealth.
If this at all sounds problematic, it isn't.
It's merely big Washington Democrat Establishment machinery being shoved down the southern christian populous's throat. What isn't so apparent, is that not only is the DEM constituency pro Farm Bill for laughable reasons, but they are (as low information voters) entirely oblivious as to the contents of the legislation. Ask your fellow DEM about the substance of the bill, and all of them will reply something other than to do with Food Stamps.
NC will deny the bill passage, but the insult of populism remains. Talking southern may buy vote's, but being disingenuous in order to advance a streamlined big government agenda doesn't. It buys contempt.
Monday, June 3, 2013
Irretrievable Grace: Why the Recent Build-up in Security Leaves "Grace" Behind
Many people, at this point in U.S. conscience and falling from grace, feel perfectly free from guilt or remorse in lue of an untenable allegiance to collectivism in practical application. The price for this may be subject to payment. What will we pay for sticking our heads in the sand in light of the encroachment upon Freedom as understood by those who remember pre-Regime American life?
What will we pay?
The debt, of course, won't be nearly as severe as the price of the damages in Oklahoma after the recent multi-billion dollar tragedy that befell those in the mid-west.
But it will be something which we may never be capable of retrieving... True "grace-as-such".
The grace of civility in matters of security and conflict domestically may be gone with the wind.
The truth and rights meant for our everyday lives by the Founding Fathers is something which could lose it's real sense of spirituo-religious grace, a peculiar existent sentiment honored and revered by most all in the U.S. for centuries. Sometimes this sense of grace was understood to be the legitimate and prevalent sentiment known as "spirit". This recognition of spirit, in the sense of, say, school spirit, as the primary mode of being-in-the-world has maintained an order of spirituality for decades.
If this sounds at all susceptible to undermining instincts it's because it very much is!
The "spirit" of a nation, of a culture, of an individual is fragile.
Grace, embodied or in some sort of differing abstract sense, is not merely finesse and mastery, though it is that in a sense. It is the innocence of majesty. Majesty, in it's pristine and noble condition outside of the constraints of disobedience. We are in danger of losing this child-like sense of majesty and spirit. Why?
Precisely this.
Tom Brokaw appearing on television directly after the Tragedy in MA. proclaiming it was time to live in a "new america" with higher security. Telling us, as the voice of a generation of boomers, to "get used to it".
The key to understanding the degeneracy of Grace is in the conceptualizations in Negative Rights, or the right to be uninhibited by government. Our freedom-as-such, in a negative sense, preserves our innocence and integrity as humans. Human's who are distinct from the "lower forms" restricted by brute sin and instinctual degradation. We stand in danger of degenerating to the status of birds in a park...
"It's like you once commented on the birds... they were all grabbing for scraps of food."
We're losing the grace intended for us by our ancestral forefathers of olde.
How can we save it?
By being graceful, each of us, in our own lives.
saying that, here are two examples of grace I've created for i-tunes:
mozart "switched on"
bach "switched on"
What will we pay?
The debt, of course, won't be nearly as severe as the price of the damages in Oklahoma after the recent multi-billion dollar tragedy that befell those in the mid-west.
But it will be something which we may never be capable of retrieving... True "grace-as-such".
The grace of civility in matters of security and conflict domestically may be gone with the wind.
The truth and rights meant for our everyday lives by the Founding Fathers is something which could lose it's real sense of spirituo-religious grace, a peculiar existent sentiment honored and revered by most all in the U.S. for centuries. Sometimes this sense of grace was understood to be the legitimate and prevalent sentiment known as "spirit". This recognition of spirit, in the sense of, say, school spirit, as the primary mode of being-in-the-world has maintained an order of spirituality for decades.
If this sounds at all susceptible to undermining instincts it's because it very much is!
The "spirit" of a nation, of a culture, of an individual is fragile.
Grace, embodied or in some sort of differing abstract sense, is not merely finesse and mastery, though it is that in a sense. It is the innocence of majesty. Majesty, in it's pristine and noble condition outside of the constraints of disobedience. We are in danger of losing this child-like sense of majesty and spirit. Why?
Precisely this.
Tom Brokaw appearing on television directly after the Tragedy in MA. proclaiming it was time to live in a "new america" with higher security. Telling us, as the voice of a generation of boomers, to "get used to it".
The key to understanding the degeneracy of Grace is in the conceptualizations in Negative Rights, or the right to be uninhibited by government. Our freedom-as-such, in a negative sense, preserves our innocence and integrity as humans. Human's who are distinct from the "lower forms" restricted by brute sin and instinctual degradation. We stand in danger of degenerating to the status of birds in a park...
"It's like you once commented on the birds... they were all grabbing for scraps of food."
We're losing the grace intended for us by our ancestral forefathers of olde.
How can we save it?
By being graceful, each of us, in our own lives.
saying that, here are two examples of grace I've created for i-tunes:
mozart "switched on"
bach "switched on"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)