Tuesday, May 28, 2013

The Answer to Our Problems: Why Communism is Terrorism, Not Acceptable

A COMMUNIST PLOT AGAINST THE FREE WORLD POLICE

BRENDAN O'Connell: Thanks sir.  I have some information.  I shall be glad to tell the committee what I have learned and hope it will dull the point of the communist sickle.


I was born in Richmond VA and educated in Pittsboro NC @ Pittsboro Elementary,  Horton Middle School, and Northwood High School.
The imperative is that the New World Police be kept currently informed of the subversive  activities of the Communist Conspiracy and how this effects the rights of citizens of the Free World, with the Communist Conspiracy's activities and how they turn us into the unwitting tools or victims of a specific campaign of subversion.

Many of us know what is back of the mob violence which we have been considering.  It is probable, however, that few of the demonstrators realize that they are victims of a war that is being waged in the free world today.  It is a life and death struggle between communism, which makes the people the slaves of the state, and free world democracy, in which the state carries out the will of the people.
Our police are among the foremost gaurdians of freedom and thus a major target of the communists.  The better the force, the greater it's efficiency, the bigger it's competence in preserving the peace, the more vital it is for the communists to destroy it.  I understand the commitee's desire that I outline the tactics of the comminust subversion and describe several case histories illustrating their techniques for attacking police.
The international Communist organization provides a training manual for espionage agents in which their duties are enumerated.  This pamphlet was seized in europe.  Let me paraphrase the tasks assigned to agents in one of the countries of the free world.
First, make investigation and report on the activities of the police and security services.
Second, investigate and repress those security organizations that support the government.
I would assume this remains till today.
Third, find ways to infiltrate the police and security organizations to steal documents-particularly those recording their knowledge of communism-and to destroy everything of value.
I beleive that the manual is specific in those instructions.

I have an example.  Let me describe briefly the history of the Communist war against the police in one of the major countries of the free world.
Until the Communist politicians started to create trouble in recent years there had never been an incident on the record showing political interference  with the administration of the police force.
The communist technique has been directed primarily toward the discrediting the police in the eyes of the people.

The communists, of course, try to tell the people that police are in the pay of foreign powers.  Efforts were made to penetrate the police and recruit personel in headquarters  and provicial offices in security units.  Further, a smear campaign attempted to discredit the leaders among the rank and file.  The more outstanding and upright the senoir police officers, the more certain they were to become a communist target.

The above example is a rather awesome example of Communist techniques against the police...  Fortunately I can report that in this instance they failed.  The fine traditions of the free world police have been restored in this nation and we're on a road to true Freedom and Democracy.

As you know, there are two general aspects of Communist activity:
(1) The subversion aspect where efforts are made to penetrate and control every phase of political, economic and cultural life of a country.
(2) the militant aspect which involves agitation, demonstrations, riots, insurrection, and rebellion.  Police must have have a capability of dealing with both the subversive and militant aspects of communism.  This requires an internal security mechanism which provides an investigative  apparatus capable of identifying and developing information on subversive individuals and organizations and capable of neutralizing their activities.  It also is necessary that highly trained and highly specialized investigative apparatus  be supported by a larger force capable of controlling demonstration, riots, and other civil disorders.

Communism will work openly and legally where it can.  But it will work secretly and illegally where it must.  Its capability for conspiratorial work largely accounts for the survival of the International Communist conspiracy.

Their international movement has developed a system of defensive measures to protect itself against the police, against intelligence agencies and against a hostile public.  Knowledge of party activities is carefully organized.  An intraparty detective service and a controlled commision guard against police penetration.

Plans for offensive action are carefully devised and except for minor local adaptations constitute a detailed blueprint for worldwide agitation.

None of us should feel that the task is easy, nor that victory will be quick.  The commies are dangerous, feindishly clever, ruthless, and determined enemies.  Their potential loot?  The biggest possible...  Control of the world.  They will not give up the goal as long as they last.


DDU - NC, 2013

(DEVISED FROM THE BIRCHERS)

BRENDAN O'CONNELL


Thursday, May 23, 2013

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Academia, Government, Media and Science: The Four Pillars of Deceit

Science.  Irrefutable.
Academia. Required.
Media. Everywhere.
Government.  Universally despised and sparsely refuted.

These four pillars of what is appropriately described as the deceit of Citizens in our time are all similar in one respect.

I'll ask you, readers and thinkers, to ponder what School, Science, the Media and Government all hold common...
















Ready?



















All of the pillars of deceit are, to a point, mandatory.  As in, extreme stigma and sanctioning if the pillar's resultant morality are not internalized, adhered to in convention and philosophy and, to a certain extent, propounded as intrinsically correct publicly.

God forbid one decisively and with determination oppose them!

Let's start our dialectic of the corrupt fruit of science with it's resultant ideologies.  One accepts science, one - except in rare and slightly forgivable circumstances - disregards religious tradition.  One studies science, one - with little exception - disregards all tradition.  One studies science, one - with or without exalting morality - condemns the right.  Inevitably.

In today's climate of intellectual sloven obedience, science has become and is becoming and had been simply a quasi-ethics of obfuscation packaged to dullards and those impressively "special" students as an assurance of profundity in thought and action.
In truth, it is the anti-thesis of such inclinations and, at it's worst and most oxen-like, simply those of an ignoble slave-cast turning the valuations of our existent class system on it's head.  I'd say it was "revaluation", yet that would seem to give to those of the decidedly scientific persuasion the honor that normally befits actual philosophy and artistic creation.  Drudging up psychologically engineered data from some un-vetted textbook publisher would fall quite short of such sentiments, it would seem.

"What about Newton?" I can only assume isn't a retort that would spring to mind for most of the scientific faithful.

Despite early Christian science's clearly important contributions, I've encountered a surprisingly disproportionate number of oxen-like dullards who, amidst their wandering and impotent dialectic, seem to feel perfectly fine dismissing the discovery of why things go towards the ground without any compunction whatsoever.

I suppose E=mc2 IS so profound that early discoveries of functional Truth aren't salient, prescient, or worth scientific inquiry.

No.


Just open up while we shove Evolutionary Theory down your hapless throat.












Now take Academia, which proceeds from science-as-such.

I have no criticism of Academia that would be anything apart from trite.

All I'll mention is - I dropped out of High School upon an urging from my conscience.  I, goaded into satiating the beast of private/public "education" went back to the local college for those as dispassionate about selling my soul for academic pedigree as myself discovered - de facto - the ideology of eugenics being taught within the first day of a class.  I suppose I should've taken the notion that the world is overfull and deserves "depopulation for environmental concerns" seriously, but I did not.  I walked away immediately.


So this simple question to you!




What is the result of not walking away?



















Government, as we all know, is tied to all things and rests in recompense.


I don't think it takes too serious of an ideological leap to take seriously the inclination to view government, in some sense, as deceitful.  In fact, this pillar of deceit lies in truth.

So, despite many misgivings by myself, I should note that government is, objectively, the least harmful pillar of deceit.  It remains a deceit with intentions pure.  It becomes much less for many and much more for a few.  Spirit, it would seem, is transparency...

Yet, the absolute limits of government are defined by the constitution of America-as-such.  These limits are the only epistemology I've known as being at all legitimate in the sense of pragmatico-teleological priority.  The priority of service to that which redeems one in the light of a fallen earth.  What is this redemption, if not derived from government and defined by church?





Finally, the final and most sinful pillar of deceit:  the media.


Media is so influential in the bathtubs of the world that many and many more make a substantial amount of sustenance perpetuating the myth that the State controlled media is legit.

It is not.


The state controlled media is not merely increasingly disappointing as a form of entertainment for weary world-goers....  It is, by great broad strokes and greater than cartoon-like hyperbole, a trainwreck delivered to the Publik on a daily basis - one failing to do that which was intended for it by early disciples of the Eternal Flame such as Ed Bernays.
  Why is the Media-as-such failing so glaringly?

By virtue of the progressive "evolving" influence of the previous Pillars.

We literally gulp, digest, shit - and then open up for a heaping dose of Deceit.



Science: A pillar of deceit.

Academia: A pillar of deceit.

Media: A pillar of deceit.

Government: Glaringly without sovereignty and without transparency or accountability.



Nice house you built.  Furnishings are so garish and upper middle class I'd like to move out, but will more than likely simply sit amidst their trash and lack of class.  Reminds me a bit of....




Reminds me a bit of the house old Mr. Jimmy Carter built.

You remember that one?  The house with the annoyingly gaush 70's decor?
















At least we're ALL doing something good!

At least we can sleep at...


RT Stillwell