On HB2 Legislation: How This Sound Policy By North Carolina Lawmakers Is Far From Extremist

Recently Gov. McCrory of North Carolina signed into law the HB 2 bill, which explicitly prohibits transgendered peoples from using public restrooms of their proclaimed gender.  The law states that the gender that is on your birth certificate is the gender oriented restroom you must use.  This fair minded policy has received marked criticism from the lgtb sect, not to mention from our own attorney general, who called the legislation a "national embarrassment".  I think the exaggerations of those on the left reveal just how out of touch with mainstream America they really are.

The fact is, under Charlottes attempted mandate, a "Transgendered" person is merely someone who associates with the opposite gender of their birth.  So that means that people with no sex change operations, hormone treatment or other sex change procedures could walk into the opposite sex's bathroom simply because they "Identify" as transgender.  This obviously and painfully opens up the future to all kinds of sick malfeasance...  Not to mention, sexual abuse.

As I've stated before, homo's bi's and transgendered people are abominations before god, and inherently psychopathological and simply perverse.  Who's to stop these freaks from trolling restrooms known to be used by children for the ends of sexually abusing them?  Who's to stop all kinds of sick and brutish things, ala' a truck stop, from occurring in what might otherwise be a safe and healthy neighborhood?  Who's to stop them?

Well, I'll tell you boy!

Gov. Pat McCrory and NC Legislature right in downtown Raleigh, North Carolina.
They put a definitive end to this malarky, and now are they sure getting heat for it.

From your average yankee liberal looking down their nose at southerners in North Carolina to media elites giving all sorts of terrible diatribe in regards to the South's moral fortitude all the way up to accusations of the much dreaded "discrimination".

It's a laughable farce.

If you really think that keeping transgendered's out of their sexually oriented bathroom of choice is so tyrannical, why don't you ask a victim of sex abuse what tyranny means.

Does "Buffalo Bill" from the film "The Silence of the Lambs" really seem like the sort of person you want using the same restrooms as women?

TY  DDU 2016

Rush Limbaugh on Obama's Visit to Cuba: "One Small Step for Man, One Giant Leap for Marxism"

Yesterday day on Rush Limbaugh's esteemed Excellence in Broadcasting (EIB) network, the Maha Rushi opined that the administration's visit to the newly befriended country of Cuba was - and I quote - "One small step for man, one giant leap for marxism."

Apart from being hilarious, I think that El Rushbo was making an important point...

That is; that the Regime's lifting of sanctions on Cuba is really, de facto - Marxism.  I've gone on in this blog about the dangers of communism and socialism-as-such, so I know when I hear Rush go on about the same concern - I must be on to something.  Marxism is, inherently, a foreign ideology.  It has always been kept around in the counter culture as a kind of hip European import, yet now it has become a part of our nation's current politik.  It's strange that marxist ideology (I can't honestly refer to it as philosophy proper) has become so mainstreamed.

But I suppose that this really points to a larger issue;

Whether or not to deal with - diplomatically - countries that are hostile to Democracy.
This regime has set the precedent, saying "Yes!" to dealing with the rogue state of Iran (whom the Bush administration refused to negotiate with), "Yes!" to nuke deals with the former U.S.S.R., and - currently - is saying "Yes!" to warming relations with an officially communist government.  Dealing with dictators is risky business, and I'd wager the Bush team had a great deal of foresight in their refusal to open diplomatic relations with Terrorist States.

And that's precisely what Cuba is - a Terrorist State.
Upon Barack Obama's visit to Raoul Castro's kingdom, the dictator was notably agitated when questioned on Cuba's position of jailing political dissidents.
The marxist leader even shouted at the U.S. press box in an appropriately fascistic and dictator-like fashion.  It would be humorous if it weren't so deadly serious.

Barack Obama's policy of appeasement of rogue nations (our enemies) seems questionable...

Why, unless this U.S. Regime is actually - de facto - marxist, would we as the beacon of light for Freedom in the world... Why would we become so friendly with a peoples that are entirely hostile to an average cup o' joe American?  I mean, Iran still constantly holds rallies where the crowd erupts in chants of "Death To America!'.  Cuba hasn't even considered releasing pro-democracy dissidents from their prisons.  Russia obviously want's to be the #1 nuclear power in the world...

Why are we opening diplomatic relations with countries that obviously mean to do us damage?

I suppose Mr. Hussein's next step will be to have a cold one with fucking Ceasar "Commie" Chavez...

It's patently ridiculous, wrongheaded in terms of foreign policy, and an altogether "progressive" approach to foreign policy.  But this is domestic democracy united, so I suppose I've drifted - ignorantly - out of concerns nationally and into the drab world of foreign policy.
I apologize...
So returning to what this means for our country;
I believe that "progressivism" is a form of neo-hegelianism brought to our nation's shores in the early 1900's, and this ideology has always been - again, "de facto" - contrary to the will of the sovereign American spirit.

Let me give you a little example of what these early progressives believed:

1) Trained in psychology, the social sciences and economics, the early progressive's in America had the notion of newly emancipated slaves being incapable of living freely, as the constitution clearly states.  That went for blacks as well as poor scotch-irish.  The enlightened ones knew for a certainty that these - and I quote directly from an early preeminent progressive - "barbarians" needed to be "civilized".

2) Due to the aforementioned academic elitism, the early progressive democrats instituted:
a. Poll taxes and literacy tests for poor blacks and scotch-irish.
b. Segregation of blacks into ghettos (I suppose they thought this ideal would turn out a little better than it did, to give them credit)
c. Economic redistribution through the "Death Tax"; which, according to Buckley, was actually intended to end inter-generational transmission of wealth.

3) These early progressives thought of your average cup of joe American citizen as little more than a means to achieve enlightened ideals, often radically marxist, socialist or even outright communist ideals.  I make this point again and again...  This kind of ideology has no god given place in our American politik.  It is not, as they say, native to this country.  Yet bringing the discussion back into the present age, we now find that european style Socialism-as-such is in vogue.  Communism still holds it's ground and advances violently within the U.S.A.'s borders.  Marxism is an eminent part of many scholarly oxen's repertoire.

These kinds of applications of ideology are quite contrary to thinkers such as George Washington, Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. - who all believed in every man's innate and God given right to Freedom-as-such.

And I would say, decidedly, that the ideologies of Iran, Russia and - to a point - communist Cuba stand in even starker contrast.

Why are liberal elites so ashamed to be American?


"For more reading on the subject, follow this link to my uber-fave anti-commie club, the John Birch Society: The John Birch Society ."
- Brendan O'Connell
Founder and member of Domestic Democracy United

RT DDU 2016
SUPERpac

Trump Declares That "If Elected, I Will Overturn the Gay Marriage Ruling": DDU Stands Firm

Domestic Democracy United 2016

Recently, after his rash of primary victories all over the country - not to mention my home state of NC - presidential hopeful Donald J. Trump declared that if he is elected, the Supreme Court ruling in favor of legalized gay marriage will be overturned.  I support Mr. Trump in this position.

The fact is, in my state of North Carolina we held a statewide vote (liberals often espouse the virtues of "state & local" government), and we decided - as a sovereign state - that we did not want Gay Marriage legalized here.  We held a vote, we made a decision as a state and I for one was quite pleased with the result.  In the press conferences held regarding this monumental victory for state's rights the repub government officials were far from homophobic.  To paraphrase one of them:

"It's not that WE think homosexuality is wrong, it's that GOD does."

Well, before the Tea Party could even take a victory lap, activist judges in the supreme court mandated that gay marriage be universally legalized in all states of the U.S.A.

This is a pretty good example of liberal fascism.

"We can't let those rednecked pleebs in flyover country have their way, the ignorant unwashed bastards!  That's it!  I know...
Let's shove gay marriage down their throats!!!"

The fact is, the Obama administration far exceeded their sovereign constitutional authority with this massive federal gov'ment sponsored tyranny.  And it really IS tyranny!

I suppose an average lib would say, "Well why do you care what people do in the privacy of their own house, huh - HOMOPHOBE..."

Well, the main answer to this collectivist conjecture is threefold:

1) Gay marriage presupposes gay adoption, which - despite the media's presentation of homo's - is very problematic.  If this seems a little hard to grasp, think of the older controversy around whether or not to allow gays to become scout leaders.  I mean, it's not that far out intellectually to ascertain that this scenario poses the risk of sexual abuse.  As a matter of fact, there are quite a few neglected studies that indicate this truly perverse truth...  I would rather homo's NOT adopt young children for, what seems like to me, obvious reasons.

2) The bible explicitly condemns homosexuality as an abomination.  For many religious leaders this poses a problem.  A clergyman who refuses to preside over a gay wedding could very well - now, as well as down the line - face serious persecution for his or her belief in scripture.  I think this is where the seemingly preposterous claim that the federal gay marriage ruling is "fascism" becomes a little more reasonable.  As a christian and United Methodist I think this travesty of justice is indicative of a direct attempt by the federal gov'ment to persecute church leaders.  Perhaps I'm wrong; but consider the cases where small business owners in this country were sued by homo's for refusing to service a gay wedding.  Does that seem reasonable?  Perhaps if you define reason as the zeitgeist of the present age; I however think this degenerate progressive culture is not only severely lacking in the quality of Reason-as-such, but altogether immoral, unethical and biased in the direction of a kind of neo-marxism.  For that reason I say, the federal gov'ment should not and according to sovereign law CANNOT shove this progressive ideology down the Church-as-such's throat.  The constitution guarantees freedom of religion.  Period.

3) Finally, and I've made this point before, there is the whole... y'know... "Soddom and Gomorrah" angle.  In scripture, so goes the so-called "myth", this city was punished by god with fire and brimstone for it's collective perversity.  I, as a United Methodist "Born Again" Christian take this tale quite seriously.  What kind of risks are we taking as a country when we normalize sexual perversity?  I think a quite dire and serious one.  The constitution of the U.S.A makes quite explicit that this country was intended to be - to a point - a "Christian Nation".  When we secularize mainstream culture to the degree where federal law mandates un-christian morality, we're taking a quite dangerous step towards the ledge...  Think of how degenerate and vile, sexually, the secularized America has become.  STI's are on the rise amongst teens.  Monogamy has degenerated from moral principle to an outmoded and static remnant of a more virtuous time than ours.  The institution of marriage has become rife with divorce, cheating and co-dependency!  If we keep on in this direction, I fear that America could become another "Soddom and Gomorrah"... and I don't want that.  You don't want that.... and Mr. Donald J. Trump has now made explicit, HE doesn't want that.


So those are my three basic reason's why I disagree with the Supreme Court ruling in favor of federally mandated legalization of gay marriage.  I ardently support Mr. Trump's platform on this issue, and congratulate his campaign on their gusto and good will towards the U.S.A.

We decided on our position on gay marriage in this fine state...  And no one, not the activist judges in the Supreme Court or the POTUS or the activist caste should be able to rob us of our will as a sovereign state in this nation.  I've been fuming over this issue for quite some time now, to be frank - and hearing that The Donald agrees with the Tea Party and is willing and open about taking steps to keep state's rights intact proves that he is far from a Totalitarian RINO.  He see's clearly that mainstream apple pie opine should dictate policy; not a radicalist POTUS administration.

So join with me in saying "NO" to gay marriage.

I've interacted with and been relatively tolerant of quite a few gay people I knew personally; and I can tell you - it really is empirically perverse.  They were perverted people, period.  They're not like you and me yet simply of a different sexual orientation.  No.  Homosexuality is, de facto, an "abomination".

Thank you.
And may God bless America!

RT STILLWELL

False Media Narrative on Trump: Obvious and Embarrassing

I often refer to media elite's as being like a flock of vultures, picking at roadkill for spare scraps of red meat.
The metaphor has never been more obvious than when it comes to the lamestream media's (not to mention counter-culture media) treatment of Trump.  It's so patently obvious that they loathe the man, yet they put on the show of being fair and honest and transparent.  Yet they are not treating Donald Trump fairly AT ALL in the media.  All it is is "rascist" this and "nazi" that, all the while foraging through the newsreels of Donald Trump for ANYTHING that would seem to make him look bad, or like a buffoon.
But Trump is no buffoon.  He tells it like it is, every chance he gets, and man do people love him for it.  His tough-guy technique really works.  I think we're all a little tired of politicians who pussyfoot about, telling us all the talking points in stale, rote fashion.  Trump's uncompromising patriotism coupled with his unique way of communicating with the base of the G.O.P. makes him by far the best candidate to vote for...
And that's what I'll be doing tomorrow, casting my ballot in my home state of North Carolina.
I'll be casting MY vote for Donald J. Trump.

But, again, the media seems so angered by Trump's resilience that they seem to be simply fuming at times when talking about Trump.  It's actually kind of embarrassing to watch, these fully grown adults trying so desperately and obviously to destroy the man.
It happens every election!
Why?
Mostly because the media is run by Columbia schooled Marxist journalists.  Any repub POTUS nominee is ALWAYS going to get the full treatment from the drive by's.
And it's a shame.  It seems to me that journalism has taken a tailspin for the worse, and now it's as if every lamestream news show has become just another snooty, disparaging version of the Daily Show with some kind of blithe pretense of professionalism!  Clips of Trump taken out of context.  Classic propaganda technique.
I'll remind readers that Domestic Democracy United is a Tea Party organization.  In Joseph Farah's Tea Party Manifesto the author makes the point that if you take one passage of scripture out of the Bible, out of context, and ignore the entire book itself; you're really doing a disservice to the message of the book.
Well that's basically what they do with clips of Trump.  You never hear them play anything substantive from his speeches...  No, it's always just another engineered (supposed) gaffe, taken fully out of context and regurgitated by the media vultures.

It's sick.

But the attacks on Trump are the very definition of futile.

He will always have critics undoubtedly, and I remember even before Trump ran for office how his name, in the city of New York, elicited scoffs and wafts of liberal elitism.
I have to say I sympathize with Trump.
It's hard to be a Champion, and when one is a true Champion one definitively draws the attention of envious people.  These people mock, laugh at, and insult the Champion - because they resent them.  It always happens.  As a successful DJ, I know how it goes - trust me.

But the fact remains, winners will win and losers will lose.

DDU 2016

Hillary Clinton Is A Farce: Why Trump Can Beat Her

Hillary Clinton has repeatedly culled into the political arena a number of gaffes, which shall remain unmentioned, but among those are the Clinton E Mail scandals.  We do not yet know the extent of the malfeasance and dereliction of duty that these emails now encompass; but should Trump succeed in winning the White House, I'm sure we will all become privy to the corruption within.
The fact is, the D.E.M. (Democrat Establishment Machine) is keeping the email's under wraps, and I would highly doubt that, under this regime, any action would be taken.  It's useless.  Hussein Obama is completely in bed with the Clintons, yet there is this false media presented narrative that they are somewhat differentiated.

Look!  They are both Alinskyites, they both have radical policies as their M.O., and they both want to tax the rich EVEN MORE!

This kind of wealth redistributionism is despicable, yet now lauded by the majority of the low info crowd.  They care little for the current politik, and even look down on Tea Party patriots who espouse the values of liberty.


Politics?  What?

It's loathsome.  We need an engaged populous to have the kind of conservative ascendancy that is necessary to take the White House.  We need Trump.
Trump is the answer.

We should all, as a party, coalesce around Donald Trump.  He WILL build a wall.  He will stop the terrorists.  He will run Homeland Security better than any president (Reagan didn't have that privilege).

Trump is the answer.

And when you look at the low numbers in the Democrat turnouts for the primaries, you may see something which could easily offset Trumps favorability numbers.  Think of it, Trump supporters are engaged.  The evangelicals.  The Born Again Christians.  The Tea Party groups, the independents, all creeds and colors coalescing around Trump for a new vision of America's future.


God Bless the U.S.A.
Domestic Democracy United 2016

Godless Heathens Control America: How We can Wrest Back Power

There is no doubt that godless heathens control the strings of America.   Academia, godless and amoral; The media, godless and secular.  The government, despite their proclamations to the contrary, is basically sold out to special interests and has no interest in promoting Christian morals in the capitol.  The establishment holds no regard of the Christian Publik-as-such, and hence, can only be seen as obfuscating the realm of truth and Christianity in the capitol hill.

We must do something about it.
We must remember, this is a Christian nation.
We cant have these new elites running around in D.C. proffering all sorts of anti-god legislation.

Gay Marriage.
Obamacare.
Attacking Gun Owners as terrorists.

It's absurd, and would merely be a farce were it not so deathly dangerous in regards to the constitution.

We need to stop the secularists from infiltrating our televisions and classrooms.  It's now in vogue, due to shows like "The Big Bang Theory" (starring a homo), to be dismissive of Christianity and all together derisive of those lunatics in flyover country.

This country is sick.

And Donald J. Trump is the man to fix it!

DDU 2016