The Case Against Big Government: Why Pioneers Prefer a Reigned In Whitehouse

Considering just how knee-jerk anti-establishmentarian the left wing of America often is, one would wonder why the counterculture doesn't embrace the right wing more.  Reagan once said, "The government that governs best governs least."

Does this imply that despite all the talk about the evils of society-as-such, the left wing in fact enjoys bigger government?

A cure-all?

Somehow I don't think this gets to the heart of the matter.

Ostensibly, the Left proper believes that not everyone is born free.  It comes down to this basic tenet.

It may sound odd, but the Left has never fully been able to comport with the concept of inherent freedom by virtue of existence-as-such.  In fact, if many counter-cultural iconoclast worshippers knew the truth, they might well go running into the arms of the, currently, immediately unlikable and stodgy Christie!

I doubt they would care enough, though.

The left has never really cared for freedom - they would rather limit freedom, limit other's sovereignty, limit the peaks of excellence.  To them, freedom-as-such is like a taco they order at a fast food chain - not an existent god-garaunteed right, endowed to all by virtue of life in-and-of-itself.  

"I'd like my cheesy crunchy crisp freedom with a large coke." They say.

Let me, for a moment, assume there is an off chance that you - dear reader - are of the Left wing school of thought.  Now I know, you don't like the idea of Christie.  I know.

But,

Just think of your own party's dirty little secret...

That is, that Progressive Democrats don't believe that everyone is born free, as the constitution clearly states.  Your party, in fact, believes it is very important that this is not the case - though they won't tell you so out loud.  No, in fact - the left believes in one thing by virtue of it's commitment to the notion that the government can and should fix the ailments and ills so eloquently underscored in soc. 101 -

They believe that one must EARN freedom.

So, one isn't born with freedom - one must earn it.

It's not something they like being public about, but trust me - a central component of the Left's ideology is that freedom-as-such must be earned, and it is not a god given right.

So, will you consider voting for someone who believes in the sovereignty of every individual?

Will you "buy into" voting for the square that believes in the sanctity of the Constitution?

Will you vote Christie?

The fact remains;  This country has an identity.

Hegel's Christianity: Why This Author Sought To Shine a Light On Christ

G.W.F. Hegel, author of such works as The Philosophy of Right and the monumental Phenomenology of Spirit (alternatively translated Phenomenology of Mind) has, notably, been demonized by conspiracy theorists upon the web as being a number of things.  Generally, these theorists such as Alex Jones and ilk connect Hegel loosely - somehow or for some reason or another - to the "New World Order".  I know little about what these hit journalists find so offensive in "The Philosophy of Right".  To proffer the young (or Neo-) Hegelian's communism I think would be far too generous.  What they more than likely object to in Hegel is his overwhelmingly influential hermeneutics, which have - according to many including myself - been the currency of not only philosophical thought ever since, but virtually every discipline from Law to Science.

But previously, there was a far more prescient question regarding Hegel's respectability. This was, of course, the question of whether or not the man himself was genuinely Christian.  

Hegel himself, at very least in his early "Phenomenology...", makes numerous references not only to God-as-such but to Christ himself.  Critics of Hegel at the time and Neo-Hegelian apologists have noted that these references were not so much wholeheartedly central aspects of Hegel's philosophy, but merely a way of avoiding Kant's fall from full intellectual authority due to the question of the authenticity of his Christianity - the main conclusion being drawn of course was that Kant was not - in fact - Christian.  The Neo-Hegelians surmise that any author at the time was, to be respected and taken seriously by the State, near required to proclaim their Christian faith...

I think this is, at very best, a troublesome claim.

The fact is, Truth as espoused by Christ was exactly what Hegel was doing in his "Phenomenology...". Shining a light upon God-as-such, or proclaiming the Word - in his own words.

Any other interpretation I'm afraid is far too inadequate for anyone who's actually immersed themselves in his "Phenomenology..." to take seriously for even a second.

Hegel, understood in the non-communist Christian mindset, was shining a light upon Christ and the Word-as-such.  He sought to, through his "born-again" Christianity, bring to light the manner in which God's word testifies to his Absolute truth.  Why was this not merely the veneer on a decidedly German expression of the Enlightenment's romanticism?  

Because Hegel talked - or more accurately 'wrote' - The Word.

It would be hard for your average Neo-Hegelian scholar to take this seriously, as well as offensive to many Christians today.  But the fact remains,  if it wasn't, as such, THE WORD itself, it was at very least the Word in-and-of-itself.

The Enlightenment was a born again Christian phenomenon, as far as I can tell.  Hegel saw his writing, his country, and his time as the culmination of all things - an historical epoche which had never before been seen.  And as much as philosophers love discounting the romanticism sweeping europe (and presumably the U.S.) at the time, this romanticism was clearly a born again Christian phenomenon!

Hegel wrote about Christ in some of the most influential works of, at very least, Western philosophy precisely because of his genuine "born again"-ness.

TY

HERE ARE SOME CONSPIRACY THEORY VIDS REGARDING HEGEL:
(I recommend not watching unless you'd like to be bored, however, I'm merely illustrating the existence of ACTUAL anti-Hegel conspiracy theories.)

...and it goes on like this!

DDU 2013 RT Stillwell

Constitutional Conservatism

One of the primary aspects of conservatism is adherence to constitutional spirit as defined by the founding fathers of the U.S.  As stodgy and traditionalist as this can appear, the belief in tradition as defined by the founders is far from conformist. You may have heard the ideology that spawned such gems as "The founders owned slaves" and "The period in history of the nation's founding is far removed from the modern or post-modern age" or "The original sentiments of the founders are irrelevant for our technologically oriented era".

These are all, unequivocally, excuses.
Unforgivable excuses for "changing" the constitution to suit the needs of a far less glorious generation than of those who fought and died to build the America intended by god himself.

Conservatives look at the constitution a little differently than your average progressive.

Where they see opportunity, we see duty.
Where they see the future, we remember the past.
Where progressive dems see change, conservative repubs recall tradition.

The idea that the constitution is a "malleable" document, meant to be changed to fit the times and circumstances is inherently based in a progressive ideology from the beginning of last century; an ideology espoused by early thinkers trained in german schools of neo-hegelianism - that is, the belief in dialectical materialism, or communism proper.

They have tried, from the beginning of the last century until today, to define the Hegelian dialectic as an historical entity-as-such.  This is incorrect.

Classical Hegalians, or "old Hegelians", looked at his profound dialectic as merely the movement of spirit in "authorship"-as-such.  The dialectic is not 'historical; according to the old Hegelians.  Dialectic is inherently spiritual.  Some have even argued that this dialectic is Hegel's synthesis of the father, the son, and the holy spirit - translated; thesis, antithesis, synthesis.

Yet these "progressives" believe the dialectic to be inherently revolutionary.  A force, an opposing force, a struggle and then the victory of one over the other.  This is inherently communist, and progressives know it.

The fact is, Marx, one of GWF Hegel's early ardent students, had a mistaken interpretation of Hegel's hermeneutics and dialectic - as did ALL of the young Hegelians.  Yet somehow we allowed their interestingly inadequate strain of political nihilism to overrun all civilized discourse.

What Marx and all progressives are doing in their revolutionary, foreign, and unpatriotic thought is attempting to remove Spirit-as-such from the equation and replace it with materialism.  The identity of a country, according to the progressive commies, is not the spirit or mind of the times and tradition - but rather, the materials.  They effectively replaced 'spirit' with 'goods', removing Christ the Lord from Hegel's formula and replacing it with something far more secular.

It was and IS a dire shame!

Yet we continue to let progressives regress tradition to a hobbesian behaviorist era in thought!

I say, bring back SPIRIT.

DDU 2013

RT

What is Psychical Energy and Why Is It Inherently Evil?

Early discoveries in psychology have yielded some troublesome results - among them, Freud's notion of what he termed "Psychical Energy".  That's right, not cyclical - not physical; but 'psychical' energy.  That is, as in - psychic energy.

It's an idea that Freud writes about quite extensively, yet is a darkly held secret amongst the psychologist cabal of today.  Freud believed that the mind has 'energy', beyond the mere physical electro-chemical charge, and this yielded an interesting yet problematic psuedo-science that has, inevitably, resulted in an inherently evil use of human spirit.

Without being too descriptive as to what exactly Freud meant by this queer 'psychical' energy, I think we all - as christians - can agree that the 'psychic' world is one of pagan evil.

If one IS to intuit what is on another person's mind, it inevitably must be a kind of grotesquely imaginative act - and this is far more moderate than what Freud had in mind when he studied the 'psychical energy' of the mind as a science.  I made the bold claim a while ago, mildly conspiratorial, that when Freud posited that the mind directly correlates to the structure of the universe he systematized something that before then had remained ethically unexamined.  This may not, in fact, be true -

However, I don't think that anyone can argue for the telephone psychic's authentic christianity.

Psychical energy and it's use remains and will continue to be inherently pagan.

This isn't to discount ALL psychological discoveries or ALL of Freud's ideas.  To be frank, I believe that if Freud himself saw how his discoveries have been misapplied in today's technological era, he would be gravely saddened.  Too bad for him, eh?

But what do we make of the bold claim itself that there even exists such a 'psychical' energy?

Obviously discounting it as inherently preposterous is the ethical reaction, but today it would seem this has become an impossibility.  How does one account for the fact that the most outrageously superstitious notion imaginable, that is - that one can quote "read minds" - how does one account for it's scientific analysis and systematization?

I honestly have no idea - all I'll say for now is that the term 'psychical energy' exists, it is generally not recognized publicly, and it is, according to my own beliefs, inherently pagan and evil.


Thank you
Brendan O'Connell founder and member of Domestic Democracy United

DDU 2013

Punk Rock Republicanism: It DOES Exist

from wiki:

Johnny Ramone was known within the punk rock community as one of its notable conservatives, and was a staunch supporter of the Republican Party. Johnny made his political affiliation known to the world in 2002, when the Ramones were inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. After thanking all who made the honor possible—clad in his trademark T-shirt, ripped blue jeans and leather jacket—he said "God bless President Bush, and God bless America".^[10] He said in an interview, when questioned on his conservatism, "I think Ronald Reagan was the best President of my lifetime." In this same interview he claimed that "Punk is right wing".^[11]
Johnny is quoted by The Observer as saying: "People drift towards liberalism at a young age, and I always hope they change when they see how the world really is."


In an attempt to distance conservatism, to a degree, from the liberal presentation of all repubs as the definition of 'square' I will be - in an attempt to start my future book "The Conservative Character" - trying to paint those who would be republican or ARE republican as defying the stereotypes leftist progressives attach to our character so mercilessly and tirelessly and typifying the true, authentic punk ethic.

Let's start with this: DIY

...or Do It Yourself.

Barack Obama during the last presidential campaign said famously "You Didn't Build It".

This is precisely the reason why liberals never find themselves truly embracing individualism.  Exactly because, as cultural studies indicate, if one adheres to an ideology in which any success attained is by virtue of Collectivism-as-such then surely such fine and time honored traditions as doing it oneself, or sheer grit and determination, or self-reciprocation etc. would be found in sour disrepute amongst the leftist cabal.

Mr. Hussein Obama said if one succeeds it is only because of some teacher that one had during mandatory educational services!  What a joke!
All success is directly despite the meddling of intellectualism, social engineering, or oversized central government.  Why?
Because of the slight of hand in "reformations".  All of the whole of the task of reforming young people undercuts Freedom-as-such...  and all success, public or private, eminates from the genuine article of Freedom-as-such.  Where there is no freedom of Spirit, there can be no freedom to excel.  Where there is no freedom to excel there can be no capitalism. 

Conservatives such as Johnny Ramone have succeeded in defining entire era's.  Succeeded in worldwide fame and notoriety.  Succeeded monetarily and with women.

But it would seem that autonomous talent is actually a threat to the collectivist mindset.
They resent, quite frankly, the fact that someone who doesn't buy into the liberal BS could be vastly more influential than they, themselves are!  All of the terrible things that have been said about Johnny, they're futile - Ramones still continue to offer vast works of bubble gum punk, with such as lyrics as "Don't talk to commies" and "I don't like communists" and "let me see you go go go go to Cuba" (Which btw - I used as a chant upon an impromptu mocking of an occupy encampment a while ago)!  

Without the public recognizing that the stodgy, grey haired repub cliche doesn't accurately represent the republican constituency we stand no chance in 2016.

We should all remember, MANY prominent musicians filmmakers and authors are Republicans - and are often attacked for it within the lamestream media!

So, remember - JOHNNY RAMONE - guitar player for RAMONES - lifelong repub.

VOTE NIXON

DDU2013

Mandated Sophistry: How Big Education is Misusing It's Authority

As I sit on yet another college campus' bounds, retiring into NYE lazy dreariness, I can overwhelmingly sense the pure disrepute of the government mandated texts and scholarly sophistry.  I've been thinking of planning, and I'd wager if an honest assessment was done of the language use in the secular textbook-typico one would find the type of sophistry reserved for pop culture.

Sophistry, as the pagan greek socrates proffered in his infamous dialectic, in that an average sophomoric latte sipper would likely question any reference to sovereign objective truth with a simple yet dismissive, "what is truth?"

The fact is, Truth is the business of knowledge.  Until the end of time from the beginning, there has been at very least correspondence truth-as-such.  Things correspond to our representations, etc.

Yet we are to believe there is, within public discourse, no correct interpretation - sociologically, linguistically, or otherwise.

It is an obvious bias of textbooks in this modern age, and to be done away with should they ever - god forbid - dare to publish fact based on sovereignty.

It is a dire shame to have all knowledge taught then glibly dismissed as pointless A Priori.

The fact is, purposiveness has not just a subjective place within academic thought.  Nor merely a philosophical/psychological analysis as irrelevant side note.


Teleology is simply the only way to take away the shackles of subjectivism in our literature.


Purpose has supposedly been disproven...

Does that mean that the questions of sovereign law have been relegated to the anthropological?

Does this imply that nothing has any A Priori synthesis worthy of a simple and pure creation?

Does this mean life is pointless?




Why not?  As long as what my heart and gut tell me are merely subjective phenomena then I'd suppose it follows that nothing is true.  Kant's "noumena" (or to what objects of consciousness correspond) is only accessible to Hosana on High, so in what sense should we assume our representations correspond to anything with a purpose?

Well, I'll proffer a hint -

and it ain't mythology... lol.


Facticity is facticity and ALL phenomena (or correspondence) refer to fact.  All facts are derived from the noumena or in-and-for-itself.  ALL for-the-sake-of-which primordiall facticity comports itself towards an understanding of it's own being - that is, hopefully your ahead of me, the image of god.

All representation is of a representation of what it is to comport towards an image of god, so to speak.





But unfortunately, you would be hard pressed to find this type of talk examined beyond the mere Hegel reference in some seemingly ironic sidenote.

We don't have to teach our children philosophy - but for the love of god, teach them Hegel's hermeneutics.  It's a way of understanding the Reason of Hosana on High, and can even redeem the average academic dullard entrenched in meaningless "fact"-as-such.  We need to teach the children that the reason of Hosana is more than just a metaphor - that Reason IS the structure of God's Creation.


I'd proffer the leftist Evolutionary Quantum Physics set would find this type of proclaimation untenable and intolerable!

Why is not their "Theory" of evolution and obviously error laden speculations about quantum nonsense more prone to being found intolerable for god fearing christian americans to study.I mean for christ's sake, I'm not advocating for anything other than Reason as defined by Western Tradition proper to be taught rather than this absolutely deplorable 'new-speak'.

Soon human life will be just a series of 'situations'.
Soon all divination will be brought to 'superstition'.
Eventually, all conscience and ethic-as-such will be considered 'sickly'.

What will happen to those who know? Those who know about the Truth?

What will become of those who don;'t want to believe in redistributionism and evolutionary eugenics theory?

What will happen to our children in schools, not having yet bitten the apple from the tree?





















And why do the liberals ALWAYS get to write the most prominent TEXTBOOKS?

















I say, if DDU has to back any one initiative in 2014 before all others - it is to bring back textbook authorship to it's roots in 17th Century Enlightenment-style Teleology.


RT Stillwell DDU 1/1/2014

A Compendium of Selections from Ann Coulter's "Treason"

In the spirit of having a little fun (as morbid as it may seem) here are some more or less random selections from a book authored by Ann Coulter entitled "Treason".

"Frustrated in their attempt to enslave the world, liberals' only fun anymore is destroying individuals."

"Democrats do the most outrageous things imaginable-collaborate with totalitarian regimes, commit felonies in the Oval Office, gay-bait senate staffers-and if anyone complains, they scream about fascist oppression."

The reporters, the Democrats...were all having a rip-roaring good laugh at the notion of Communists in government.  Stalin's show trials must have had them in stitches."

"Confident that the media would portray them as eloquent and reasonable no matter what they did, the Democrats behaved like animals..."

"This is treated as comparable to Henry V's speech at Agincourt, only more inspiring."

"Another act of mind-boggling courage was lyndon johnson's single flight through-out world war 2-as an observer-for which he was awarded the Silver Star, the third highest combat award.  For the rest of his life, Johnson wore what historian David Halberstam called 'the least deserved and most proudly displayed Silver Star in military history.'"

"Stalinist spies were passing secret government document files to Soviet agents, and the Treason Party sprang to action by vigorously investigating the precise words McCarthy had used in a speech to a women's Republican club in West Virginia.  This from the 'legally accurate' crowd.  Bill Clinton denied under oath that he had engaged in sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky, that  Monica Lewinsky had engaged in sexual relations with him, or even that he was ever alone with Monica Lewinsky.  This is hailed as Clinton's courageous effort to 'save the Constitution.'"

"People who assure us McCarthy presided over a reign of terror also describe Ken Starr's plodding, meticulous investigation as a reign of terror.  And they say that when we're watching.  Imagine when they'll say when the generation that knows the truth is gone."

"Right up until the Venona Project was declassified, proving the existence of a vast network of Soviet spies in America throughout the forties and fifties, the 'Red Scare' industry was still going strong.  Literally months before Venona was declassified, Griffin Fariello released an inadvertently hilarious book titled 'Red Scare: Memories of the American Inquisition'.  The book consisted of scores of 'oral histories' describing 'how it felt to live amid an ideology now labeled McCarthyism."

"Liberals have a preternatural gift for striking a position on the side of treason."

"You could be talking about scrabble and they would instantly leap to the anti-American position."

"Everyone says liberals love America too.  No they don't."

"They boast (lyingly) about their superior stance on civil rights.  But somehow their loyalty to the United States is off-limits as a subject of political debate."

"Liberals demand that the nation treat enemies like friends and friends like enemies.  We must lift sanctions, cancel embargoes, pull out our troops, reason with our adversaries, and absolutely never wage war-unless the french say it's okay."

"Is it more patriotic to love your country or to ridicule those who do as "naive" and "angry"?  These are not questions impenetrable to human logic."

"Free speech is a one-way ratchet for traitors.  While journalists assailed Bush for creating an atmosphere of intolerance for those who 'object to patriotic oathes,' they didn't mind creating an atmosphere of intolerance toward those who support patriotic oaths."

"Liberals unreservedly call all conservatives fascists, rascists, and enemies of civil liberties with no facts whatsoever."

"Liberals malign the flag, ban the Pledge, and hold cocktail parties for America's enemies, but no one is ever allowed to cast the slightest aspersion on their patriotism."

-

Zing!

Merry X-mas,

DDU RT 2013

In Defense of Eddie Bernays: Why Liberals Hate The Pinnacles of Genius

The fact is, liberals - i.e. democrats or 'the left' - hate genius.  Their idea of profundity is constituted by either physicists with their heads up their asses, humanist oxen reciting what they'd gleaned from the back covers of various books, or their favorite pop icon who makes millions off liberals' penchant for being entertained by the nooks and crannies of their own mirror image.

This wouldn't be the least bit bothersome were it not for the fact that when conservatives attain the greatness of authentic genius they respond - as per Coulter's "Demonic" thesis - as a pitchfork/torch clad hoarde of townspeople, barraging down the street to a mansion's doorstep in the grim hope of running some monster out of it's mansion and "our town".  It's a rather blithe metaphore, however - when most of these hayseed townsfolk have degrees at secular institutes for profanity (i.e. what were onced cutely coined 'schools'), the blitheness becomes very serious indeed.

I'll merely say, that this would be hard to prove - were it not for the fact that almost every conservative intellectual who's achieved anything of import is ritually character assassinated by worthless authors of the anti-exceptionalist bent.  You can even find such books, easily.  They combine, in short reviewe, the difficulty and budget of documentary filmmaking with the impartiality of lamestream media.  Take for example the most prominent conservative of the last century.  His name was Eddie Bernays - author of among other books the light read "Propaganda".  Decades after it's publishing liberal activists did a spit take over the gall that someone responsible for creating advertising as we now know it would be so transparent as to title a work of authorship such an obviously sinister nome.  Propaganda.  They have held up Mr. Bernays, Sigmund Freud's nephew, as an archetype of the evil unscrupulous person responsible for 'brainwashing' the poor unclean masses in flyover country into believing things like:

1) It's nice to own property.
2) Fast cars are desirable.
3) Coffee and cigarettes make an enjoyable couplet.
4) Attractive women are good wives and mothers.
5) Steak and other meats taste delicious.
6) Suburbs are appropriate places to live.

etc.

Obviously, these kinds of flagrant violations of justice and ethics are to be combatted.


Edward Bernays was, to put it mildly, keen to some of the discoveries in classical psychology that were - at the time - truly groundbreaking new ways of understanding why humans do what they do, want what they want, and live the way they live.  He merely applied this insider understanding - as per Freud - to conventional advertising and, as with most genius, everyone followed suit.
Think of that popular cable television show "Madmen".  Take the most prestigious character from that fictional account of the ad world during the time.  Now multiply the wit by 100, multiply the power by 1000, and multiply the status by 1 million and you would have a pretty fair idea of who Mr. Bernays was.

Yet he is characterized in collective zeitgeist and near fictional accounts of his person as a dreary, almost profanely middle class meddler, a 2 bit chiseler - if you will.  He is painted to be a sort of mustachio'd "manipulator" - a term virtually invented by modern propagandists without the flair for style of Bernays.  He is, almost assuredly, implied by almost any liberal who conjures his name to be an all American idiot of kin to Goebbels himself.

Why?

Because liberals feel compelled to rewrite history to suit their hatred of American Exceptionalism.

How?

Mostly through 2 bit montages of womanly fretting in documentary film and laughably "intellectual" passages in books made for, by, and sold TO academic oxen.

When?

I'll give you a guess when it all started and it starts with 'sick' and ends with 'ickies'.



The only reason this is more than a sidenote on something marginally important from the past is because the Left's misrepresentation of Bernays' substantial contribution to the character of the former U.S.A. is what, guaranteed, the activist caste's god, Mr. Hussein himself, actually believes!
His boomer-esque affinity for qualifying 1950's morality as inherently un-american (I never thought I'd see the day) is part and parcel with this type of rewriting history.  Mr. Bernays is no longer the most prominently influential intellectual of last century.  McCarthy is no longer the most principled American of last century who fought against soviet spy's.  Buckley Jr. is no longer the man who single handedly fought back the most significant coup attempt of the last century.


No, these hyperboles and others can't be allowed.

Now, more realistic characterizations are apt.

Bernays was a traitor who turned people into zombies.
McCarthy was a monster who burned witches at the stake!
Buckley Jr. was a...


















well, I shouldn't even start -



















All I mean to say is that WHEN conservative men DO achieve the heights of true genius they are defamed, redacted, remembered inaccurately and unscrupulously - almost across the board - character assassinated.  Why?


Because they fear us.  They fear what we stand for.






RT DDU 2013

The Most Important Thing About Christmas is Christianity: Free Speech Under Assault

My Fiance: "Merry Christmas!"
Her Co-Worker: "You're not supposed to say merry christmas, it's happy holidays."

The assault on freedom of speech may have culminated in saying happy holidays as opposed to merry christmas and other such politically correct nonsense, but recently, it has had some startling ramifications:

Lars Hedegaard, head of the Danish Free Press Society, found himself convicted of - out of all crimes possible - 'racism' for remarks about islam's treatment of women.  He believed these remarks to be made in private, but they were, in fact, tape recorded and broadcast to the world - used as evidence in his trial.  What was he guilty of?  Obviously a crime: racism.

Rev. Stephen Boissoin was convicted of, close to the worst crime possible, homophobia.
The evidence against him?  Provided by one Lori Andreachuk, a self described 'social engineer' taking part in Alberta's lifetime prohibition of any "disparaging" remarks against homosexuals.  He was banned from ever saying anything contrary to a lifestyle described in Leviticus as an "abomination".  One key to note.  This was not a prohibition against anything 'hatefull' - but merely 'disparaging'.

Dale McAlpine was arrested for handing out leaflets in England - a lifelong Christian himself.  A self described member of the gay lesbian and altogether freakoid society arrested him and sentenced him for causing 'distress to the public'.  He was accused of "talking in a loud voice" that might have been overheard.  he was fingerprinted, DNA-Sampled, and tossed in prison for 7 hours - merely for stating his opinion that gays were, as per :Leviticus, an abomination.

14 year old Codie Stott was arrested and jailed for 3 1/2 hours for merely asking to be in a different group, in school, from her Urdu "playmates".  her shoelaces were stripped off - they photo'd and fingerprinted her, a dehumanizing affair: her crime?  She complained she couldn't understand the ethnic immigrants language.
Section 5: "Racial Public Offense".

A young man much like yourself, Mr. Kinsella of Ottawa, was forced by the court to apologize to a chink simply for making a joke in public about ordering a cat at his favorite Chinese restaraunt.

Neo-Nazi's in Canada were brought to human right's tribunals simply for handing out Xeroxed pamphlets at pay phones, which was used to bring about "Speech Codes" etc.

Guy Earle, a comedian, was fined 15 hundred dollars simply for daring to put down two drunken hecklers during his performace.  HIS CRIME???  The drunken hecklers happened to be short haired butch lesbo's.

Sir Iqbal, knighted by the U.K., was investigated by Scotland Yard for "Homophobia".
The GALHA, a gayer group, was concurrently investigated by Scotland Yard for "islamaphobia".

I heard that even one Mr. Ledger was arrested for 'racism' merely for performing the hit song "Kung Fu Fighting"!!!!


The fact is, if simply saying "Merry Christmas" isn't outlawed NOW, it WILL BE in the future unless we fight for freedom of speech.  we'll find ourselves, in 20 or 30 years, in a dystopian wonderland where even acknowledging what atheists have termed 'the disease of christianity' will be a criminal offense.

And if these ponderous quantum-physics nutbags have their way, it will be.

We need to all, for the sake of the fact that CHRIST reigns supreme over all heathens and atheists, proclaim the sovereignty of Christ this christmas season with a little bit of malice and hatred in our hearts: for the multiculturalist cabal seeks to strip us of that right.  We should show them, this is a CHRISTIAN time of year.  It's not the birth of Richard 'FAGGOT' Dawkins we are celebrating.  It is the birth of the ONLY way to god's person.  It is a celebration of THE ONLY WAY TO GOD -


































That is,



























Christ.




























So say Merry Christmas with a little disdain,
Thanks.


Brendan O'Connell
Founder and Member of Domestic Democracy United

I've recently viewed a video of William F. Buckley Jr. interviewing one mr. Saul Alinsky.
In light of this and my previous attempts to indict the Regime on counts of alinskyan criminality, I've decided to rebroadcast this episode of DDU Dialup in order to put some perspective into the subject-as-such.

The horrifying thing about mr. Saul Alinsky is that he seems so cool and convincing in such a way as to lead normal godfearing patriots into essential conceding territory.

This is unfunctional.

The fact is, the ideology of Alinsky and neo-Alinskyan socialists has no place in the U.S.

It is a dangerous strain of political nihilism, and the mere fact of it's existence within our borders undercuts, by it's basic nature, democracy, republicanism and sovereignty.

I hope you enjoy this short video, derived from the NR.

RT

Petty Change: How the Slavish Resentment of Liberals Undercuts Freedom

I'd like to start this short critique of the current climate of liberal malfeasance by contrasting two similar but drastically different emotions:

1) Contempt

2) Resentment


Conservatives have contempt for, look down their nose at, liberals.

Liberals look upward towards the aristocracy, i.e. conservatism, with resentment.

It's a distinction based on much more than class, the master and slave parable, or classical psychology - though all apply.  It's a distinction that can only be understood properly in the judeo-christian context, further, as it relates to freedom as the Founders understood it.

The Founding fathers who fought and died for this country and what it was to become had contempt, a godly emotion, for Hobbesian behaviorism and all that it entailed.  For them the "Nasty, brutish and short" adage of Thomas Hobbes was beyond even mere Nihilism - It was an easy out for a culture that had grown stale and dreary with collectivism-as-such; a way of ignoring that which ultimately gives life meaning i.e. compassion and the sentiments.

Broadly understood, compassion or "mitleid" in german means "caring" or "concern".

I don't mean to be dismissive altogether of such concepts and their hermeneutic underpinnings, however, the word "concern" under Mr. Hussein Obama and his Regime has degenerated - some would say "changed" - from meaningful circumspect idea to an intolerable 'notion'.

Look up the word "notion" in your search engine if you'd like, and you'll see how tragically humorous this really is.  "Notion", as such, hardly signifies a worldview capable of anything even timidly approaching a character capable of contempt.  Notional inclination can only, as per the reformations-as-change proffered by the Regime, bring about resentment or resentement.

Petty change, brought about by slaves.



The fact is, slaves - such as the liberal character precludes inherently - are great at many things...  tilling, social work, activism etc.
One thing a slave, as-per social justice adherents and leaders, is incapable of is leadership.

You simply cannot yield nor wield the reigns of mastership with the petty emotion of resentment.  It's, by virtue of how the existent system of social exchange operates in the objective law, incapable of being above any individual or universal-as-such.  Resentment always looks "upwards".  Contempt always looks "downwards".  If a leader has resentment of anything whatsoever - the free market, the demands of industry, the duties required of them - there cannot exist leadership-as-such.  It would, in this instance, merely be unlawful fascism.


So I shall conclude by saying that those who seek to enact change are by necessity petty resentful slaves, actively engaged in unlawful treason.


...and we all know the punishment for treason.




RT STILLWELL DDU 2013

Liberal Benevolance: Chicago Cartel Targeting The South

The regime, i.e. the Barack Hussein Obama Administration of the moment, is targeting the south in the manner of a criminal cartel targeting a law abiding whistle blower.  They sum up the opposition.  Identify the threat.  Then pretend to be friendly to the target, whom they intend to assasinate, in order to make a mockery of law-in-general.

The threat to state sovereignty has never been more severe.

It is much like that movie with Michael J. Fox, "Mars Attacks".  If you'll remember, the martians proclaim "we come in peace" whilst killing every single patriot they can in the largest numbers possible...

I'm telling you, we are in serious danger from an Alinsky-ite directed criminal cartel, otherwise known as the Regime, trying to proclaim that they like us whilst doing every single fascistic totalitarian covert-op to not only destroy defame and dismember - but to humiliate and ultimately provoke violent and civil disobedient acts against repubs, self proclaimed conservo's and especially tea party patriots that they can ultimately muster.  It is not only inherently criminal as-per Alinsky, but ultimately a massively complex con-job being pulled off by a multi-culturalist social justice Regime elected by academic dullards and indoctrinated scholarly ubermenches of such a character that only passages from the bible describing Satan's treachery and malice can adequately address sufficiently just how corrupt the fruit of this Kenyan's criminal cartel is.

The fact is, a Muslim Regime is controlling the former U.S.A. - doubt me?

Don't.

The "Hussein" - trained in Alinsky, protest activism, and evolutionary eugenics' "intellectualism", has mandated an all out "Mars Attacks" approach to the now universally recognized right wing heroism that permeates all red states in Moscow America.

"we come in peace"
They are now currently proclaiming -





























They are doing every single thing possible, the regime of Mr. Hussein, to assault literally and metaphorically the profoundly prescient right wing of the Soviet State of America.  Yet no one realizes the deviant subversion.
No one profoundly can counter these physical and spiritual assaults on sovereignty.

Why not?


I'll tell you why.


Because we let - WE ALLOWED - the evolutionary idiots to take hold of our indoctrination centers (what we used to refer to as {I know it's a quaint term} "schools".
Because we ALLOWED, due to 'moderate ideology', evolution to be taught as anything other than a deviant misuse of intellectual sophistry and dull childlike adherence to obsolesced ideology and evil spiritual prowess.

...

- "yeh, so even attempting to type this caused numerous incursions into my private ability to write at the moment, signifying that collectivism-as-such (as I have defined) is so overwhelmingly part of the former U.S.'s mechanism that no sovereign authority is even possible-as-such.  The regime thinks there will be no backlash to this type of abuse of power etc. etc.  I would strongly urge them to back down for the sake of their children.  WE KNOW WHAT YR DOING.  I'M WARNING YOU NOW - STOP OR THE REPUB PARTY WILL ENACT REVENGE."

Brendan O'Connell DDU founder and member -










(based on the fact that evolution has disallowed creationism/intelligent design from even existing-as-such)

91.5 Million Not Working: Distorted Unemployment Numbers Giving Publik a False Impression

According to today's broadcast on Rush Radio, the numbers given for unemployment preceding the 2012 POTUS election, 7.8 % unemployment, were not only bogus but part of a presidential bid by the regime that had decided to "do whatever it takes" to win the election.  The real number of unemployed, around 91 million people (just now becoming publik), has been ignored in favor of "adjusted" numbers.  The census bureau has now publicly stated that the numbers given for unemployment are a distortion of the fact of 91.5 million unemployed, and that the "non-job seeking unemployed" loophole is hiding the real and dreadful facts about the depth of unemployment nationally.

This issue is rife with comment, so I'll merely state that DDU believes that a healthy unemployment rate is an important part of a functioning economy.  You can't have 100 percent employment, and those who are not working often play a vital role in a culture, society, and civilization.  However, if it is true that the unemployment numbers were manipulated in 2012 to present a rosier picture of our economy than was factual it is, indeed, a dire shame.  Republican's, as part of our differance with ideology, do not manipulate and cherry pick data in order to present a false narrative.  We feel strongly about our religion, our truth, our philosophy - and we stick to our guns and fight fairly.  The left, though rarely recognized, is hardly as altruistic...
This is a major tactical difference in the two parties.
One, the Democrat party - feels it okay to "take refuge in ideology"...
The other, the Republican Party, can hardly make time to address all the slander and misrepresentations leveled at it, and rarely does due to the right's dedication and commitment to Honor.
The Democract Party feels no compunction facilitating unions to usher voters into the voter booth.
On the opposite side of the coin, Republicans make arguments based on their intrinsic merit, and don't compromise with organized labor.

The Democrat party seems to, as today's breaking news indicates, feel that adjusting the unemployment numbers and lying about the state of the economy is all a perfectly acceptable "means to an end".

The Repub heritage would never sink so low...










The fact remains, near 100 million U.S. citizens unemployed!
And those mongrels up in capitol hill persist on opening up the borders for floods of immigrants to just wash into our country and take our jobs.  They want to offer a pathway to the american dream...


For illegal immigrants who are currently, in massive proportions all throughout our states and country, taking jobs and, more importantly, pay out of honest American native's hands.  Cheap labor at the cost of John Q. Public's financial independence.  91.5 million out of work...  how many illegal immigrants are there in the former U.S.A.?  I'd say it's a safe wager that many or more!!!  100 million is around how many people will lose their health insurance under obamacare!

That's not penuts folks -  that's a symptom of a major problem.

The Medicalization of Deviance and Obamacare: A Dangerous Certainty

The medicalization of deviance is a complex theory regarding how and why the healthcare system is used to promote the reformation of deviants and deviance-as-such, so obviously I will be unable to address all of the various schools of thought on this subject adequately.  However, it's more than probable that this medicalization of deviance-as-such will increase in it's use and abuse under the new Obamacare psuedo-law that the regime has engineered as it's lone gift to U.S. history for generations to come.

It was once said, you don't have to be president-for-life if you can create a bureaucracy-for-life.

The impact on young children of this bureaucracy in particular is a fairly tragic result of creating nationalized healthcare and positing it's mission, health, as a law of sorts.

Young children of school age who "act out" will surely be the victims of the boomers lack of foresight in regards to Obamacare.  The will be medicalized with the efficiency, transparency, and culpability we've come to expect from the Regime.  They will certainly be considered deviant for daring to question the now atheist oriented school system, and will likely be ingested by the "system-as-such".

It is a crying shame.

Obamacare will only increase this brash misuse of authority, and certainly make the America we all remember, over the course of a generation or so, an impossibility to exist-as-such.  Say goodbye to apple pie...

Say hello to the psych ward.

We all know that one friend of ours that has "problems".

We sympathize with their plight, but not so much as to care-as-such when they become drowned in the healthcare system's bile and undigested material. 

We love them, but we hope they will get the "help" they need.

We think of them with empathy, yet give little heed to their rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

In the collectivist legislation that is the Affordable Healthcare Act, we can see that individual rights - such as the right to deny care or treatment - go down the drain.  Now, if you don't sig heil the new Socialist States of America - you will likely become one of those poor souls in dire need of "fixing".

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In a final note on this short segment, I'd like to pull the rug out from under the "Compassion" that is posited blithely as the underpinning of Obamacare.  

Who hasn't heard some neo-progressive say something to the effect of - "The overweight, smokers, disabled, etc. are costing ME money!  They are (something to the effect of) a burden on the 'system'.  We need Obamacare because 'those ones' are weighing down the entire medical establishment."

I've heard it at least five times in casual conversation...

It's an uncompromisingly scary worldview.  It will, most likely, lead to the execution of undesirables through the medical system at some point in U.S. history.

And it is, unequivocally, not compassionate.  Not sympathetic.

I'll perhaps give that sentiment the title of "empathetic", but keep in mind that's just "pathetic" with a couple of letters before it.

The founders and, yea- their entire generation of courage and genius, must surely be turning in their graves....

RT STILLWELL  DDU 2013

Daily Show on Obamacare: "They Can't Spin This Turd"

Single payer, government run healthcare has been what was getting sold to the U.S.A. in the Affordable Healthcare Act the entire time, it's now being revealed.  None of that "just a little regulation" nonsense that was being spouted about for the last several years.  Full on, government run, healthcare - single payer - is the final result of the bastard of a bill that was the Affordable Care Act.  There's a little truth -

- You will pay, handsomely, for Obamacare -

The fact that no one discerned this previously only highlights the low information voter base's lack of readily available foresight.  We warned them.

They didn't care.

Now, after it has become public that the Affordable Care Act legislation is not only unaffordable but a total disaster, people are becoming aware that - "Woah, this is gonna be a major pain in the ass...".  Substantially, the obamacare project makes Hippocrates the reigning ruler of U.S. spirituality rather than Christ.  It creates a leader class of those who have taken this "hippocratic oathe" and lead's us into a hellworld where dentist-type "health" becomes a little more than that annoying thing we hate about having to keep up with the jones's.  It makes the dentist the LAW!

So, anyhow, the big news is thus:  Low info voter hangout cult leader John Stewart, host of the Daily Show, has now called Obamacare out for what it is... a total mess.

Last night on the daily show, Mr. John Stewart noted in regards to Obamacare that "They can't spin this turd".  All too true unfortunately.

The fact is, now that obamacare has become a reality, the masses of publik people in the U.S. have gradually come to realize that Obamacare is as Stewart described: a turd.

A turd that will cost you, potentially, 13% of your income.

All so you can have a dentist dictate the law for the rest of U.S. history!

One thing to note before I come to another forthright conclusion:

Do you like the solace of a hearth and glass of Burbon?

Do you occasionally take slightly more of your medication than prescribed?

Do you, upon a rare moon, go a bit hayware?

With obamacare, prepare to be demonized by the incompetent.  Prepare to be marginalized for having a good time.  Prepare to be called crazy for doing anything out of the ordinary - by marxists...

You know, for a long time the republican party has been thought of in the collective zeitgeist as the party of stingy, uncaring old people.

Get ready, in the next 10 years, for that to change dramatically.

The fact is, as per Alex Jones, the republican party is increasingly gaining traction as a countercultural icon - keeping the country free from fascism.

But the cold fact remains...

Obamacare IS fascism ~

DDU 2013

DDU RALEIGH NC

RT STILLWELL