What is a Marxist? A Dialectic on Democracy

 A lot of people in Law enforcement have queried over the years, what is a commie?  what is a socialist?  what is a marxist?

Well,

I'm an American - so I don't have to look up words to know what they mean in my native toungue.  And what I shall lay out here, not only are Marxists (i.e. communists, socialists etc.) not an Academic phenomenon (to be involved in any intellectual pursuit would require some kind of awareness or study of Marxism as an ideology for governance), NOT a counter-culturalist identity (though some may be part of a Marxist Conspiracy, however, most aren't well read enough to even be cognizant of the Communism inherent in some aspects of their lifestyle), and NOT a racial identity.

What do we know about Marxism,

so we can catch the real bad guys?

Well,

If wee looke toward webster-merriam, we see that it is essentially a form of governorship, a way of governing others.

So instead of looking to hippies, punks, hip hoppers, or nationalists for this type of Un-American "Marxist" tag, I'd look - in fact, to governors as such...

De facto - the only people even capable of being what we know to be a "Marxist" are people involved in State or Family governance.  I include family, b/c often times this can be true of how people administrate their household in the boomer generation.

But esp. in realms of Governance, Marxism becomes a problem.

A guy at a coffee shop bulling about Karl Marx is actually, according to the webster-merriam definition, not a Marxist!  A marxist isn't even a teacher whose main ideological underpinning in their role in academe is communism, or socialism.  A marxist can, essentially, only be a government administrator.

So that would be my def. of Marxism.

It's not one of us who are the problem,

It's anyone in a position of Government power (as Tax Payer Funded), who could be detected to be a communist.  This would generally have less to do with them being identified as a noticable democrat as such, and more to do with finding what they believe, officially, about historical dialectic.

A marxist will say history, through hegelian dialectic, evolves.

A non-marxist won't.

They may have both read similar philosophy and texts,

but the main difference is, a devout follower of Karl Marx will believe, whole-heartedly, in "Dialectical Materialism", rather than a Derridian Notion of Hegel as Authorship...

So remember,

When we talk about the dangers of Marxists in Trump's politik, we're not talking about civilians - who are in an existentiel sense incapable of Marxism - we're referring to Communists and Socialists within the Federal, State and Local Government...

Hell,

There are even Communists within the republican party!

So remember,

My intent is to stay focused on the real enemy - MARXISM

ddu23