One of the most difficult things for liberals to comprehend properly is the concept of American Pride-as-such. Deep within the foundations of progressive ideology is a certain resentment of the Traditions of America going back to the Founding.
American Pride is something the Right Wing really LIVES. We not only feel a deep love for the constitution and the founding father's theology and philosophy, but actually live in a state of Pride for our country, our servicemen, and our works. This American Pride is, to me, a clear virtue.
But let us, for a moment, contrast that sentiment with the notion that Pride is a deadly sin. Pope Gregory described it as "the deadliest sin". After all, the Jesus Christ does say "Blessed are the meek". How do we reconcile the notion that pride is a sin with say, love of country and god - and pride in that love.
I think the answer is, we should feel both pride and shame, regarding patriotism.
But let's take it back in history a bit to ancient Greek civilization. Aristotle described "Pride-as-such" as one of the key virtues, in fact, the most important virtue. He had a concept of something he called "The great souled man", or something to that effect. Pride was considered by the Greeks to be, generally, a positive trait in a person. So the philosophy of Pride goes throughout history.
Even until today, when we have "Black Pride" and even "Gay Pride". Are these examples of a kind of "deadly sin"?
I would certainly say so.
But "American Pride" as in "Pride of Country" far exceeds this kind of sin.
Further, pride in one's works and labors should fall under a kind of love of country and God.
So in conclusion,
The word Pride, in latin, translates as "Superbia"...
And when has is ever been bad to be Excellent?
DDU 2015
Saturday, May 30, 2015
Monday, May 11, 2015
Franklin Graham To Fox News Audience: "Stop All Immigration From Muslim Countries"
The honorable son of NC legend Billy Graham, Franklin Graham, commented recently in a Fox News interview in which he expressed extreme displeasure with the Genocide occurring in the Middle East -
suggesting that, in fact, we should stop ALL immigration from Muslim countries.
That type of honest and, if you saw it, impassioned stance would likely cause the liberal leftist cartel to balk, however looked at from a foreign policy perspective, it's not a particularly extreme position to take. In fact, I believe Mr. Graham was on target.
Now Mr. Graham's words echo not only the mainstream opine' of 'Merica, but decidedly many christians of ALL denominations. ISIS/ISIL are Muslim extremists plotting to attack our plot of apple pie right now, AS I SPEAK@! If we don't just outright STOP immigration from Muslim countries I fear that we could become susceptible to hardcore Terrorism, the likes of which we have never seen.
Mr. Graham, I had mentioned previously, expressed "displeasure" with the Muslim Faith, but beneath the outright platform of his personal relationship with Christ, King of Kings, was a submerged anger with and at terrorism. I think this anger is shared by, again, the Mainstream of America -
An America that recent elections show is trending towards the right end of the political spectrum.
So Kudos Mr. Graham,
I support your impassioned platform on immigration,
and truly am praying for the security of this country.
DDU 2015
Saturday, April 11, 2015
States Stand Up To Fed: Say No To Homo Marriages
All across the plains of our great nation, states are standing up to the federal government and it's executive dictate forcing godfearing christians into taking part in the "abomination" that is Homosexual marriage.
I applaud our governors and legislators for sticking it to D.C. in saying maybe that kind of sodomite-tolerant B.S. is okay in YOUR state, but round here we don't take kindly to Homosexual Marriages. We have a right to defend ourselves against becoming a notion of sodomy tolerance.
We have a right to say no to Homo Marriages.
We have a right to tell the entire world's leaders that a union of marriage is between a man and a woman, period.
Yet the the latte swilling npr listening libs think it's their right to force godfearing christians to serve an ethic that undermines religious liberty.
It's a farce.
They can't make anybody, even with court fines and mandates, be tolerant of the "abomination" that is homosexuality!
So I say, hey ole 'Bama, Holder and Hillary...
"Take the rhetorical bullshit elsewhere cause it ain't gonna work around here."
Domestic Democracy United 2015
RT STILLWELL
I applaud our governors and legislators for sticking it to D.C. in saying maybe that kind of sodomite-tolerant B.S. is okay in YOUR state, but round here we don't take kindly to Homosexual Marriages. We have a right to defend ourselves against becoming a notion of sodomy tolerance.
We have a right to say no to Homo Marriages.
We have a right to tell the entire world's leaders that a union of marriage is between a man and a woman, period.
Yet the the latte swilling npr listening libs think it's their right to force godfearing christians to serve an ethic that undermines religious liberty.
It's a farce.
They can't make anybody, even with court fines and mandates, be tolerant of the "abomination" that is homosexuality!
So I say, hey ole 'Bama, Holder and Hillary...
"Take the rhetorical bullshit elsewhere cause it ain't gonna work around here."
Domestic Democracy United 2015
RT STILLWELL
Saturday, February 28, 2015
The Terrorist Threat Domestically: Radical Islam Bent On Another U.S. Attack
The Barack Obama regime has consistently portrayed Isis and other islamic militants as not terribly problematic in terms of the actual threat that they pose to U.S. Homeland Security. I believe ole' 'Bama himself dismissed the attack in France as "Just a few ragtag extremists", always taking time to note that they in no way reflect on Islam as a whole. It's as if he's attempting to be politically correct regarding a group that see's public beheadings of westerners as common course.
And it's patently ridiculous.
The fact is, Isis seeks to damage America and other Western nations, and probably will do so. They will stop at nothing to see American's killed at the tip of Islam's spear. And get it straight:
Over 80 percent of muslims sympathize with Isis.
The fact is, the POTUS taking time to be culturally sensitive to the islamic community only reflects the degree to which these people have no sense of community or decency, a civic pride or virtue, or anything even approaching what we in the west know as "Civilization".
They see the Christian and Jewish community as enemies precisely because their Koran urges them to wage "holy war" on the infidels. There will be no end to the brutal slaughter of Westerners, and we need an administration that doesn't have to apologize for being tough on radical islamists, or even so-called "moderate" islamists. The fact is, any average muslim could be a sleeper cell. Probably many are already, but haven't the inclination to strap on a suicide vest or some such thing.
Radical Islam is determined to strike again in the U.S., and if we don't learn from history I fear we could be doomed to repeat it. And from the rumblings of some in the muslim community, it could be bigger than any of us had feared. A strike in the U.S. could potentially be devastating, and should Obama quit his laughable game of politically correct Socialism/Communism I'd wager he'd have his work cut out for him on Homeland Security alone.
But in between playing Golf with his buddies and ramming legislation down the states throats' he doesn't seem to have adequate time to take on the threat posed by Isis and other Islamic militants seriously. It would seem that this massive organization of muslims dedicated to killing Christians and Jews is nothing more than "a few ragtag extremists"... nothing to be alarmed about.
It's absurd.
Given an adequate amount of time, I'm almost certain we will see another terror attack perpetrated by muslims in the U.S. - hopefully we can stop them, but it would seem to many that the perversity of the Islamic faith is such that stopping them entirely without mass deportations seems unlikely.
That's why I urge you to fight back.
Domestic Democracy United 2015
And it's patently ridiculous.
The fact is, Isis seeks to damage America and other Western nations, and probably will do so. They will stop at nothing to see American's killed at the tip of Islam's spear. And get it straight:
Over 80 percent of muslims sympathize with Isis.
The fact is, the POTUS taking time to be culturally sensitive to the islamic community only reflects the degree to which these people have no sense of community or decency, a civic pride or virtue, or anything even approaching what we in the west know as "Civilization".
They see the Christian and Jewish community as enemies precisely because their Koran urges them to wage "holy war" on the infidels. There will be no end to the brutal slaughter of Westerners, and we need an administration that doesn't have to apologize for being tough on radical islamists, or even so-called "moderate" islamists. The fact is, any average muslim could be a sleeper cell. Probably many are already, but haven't the inclination to strap on a suicide vest or some such thing.
Radical Islam is determined to strike again in the U.S., and if we don't learn from history I fear we could be doomed to repeat it. And from the rumblings of some in the muslim community, it could be bigger than any of us had feared. A strike in the U.S. could potentially be devastating, and should Obama quit his laughable game of politically correct Socialism/Communism I'd wager he'd have his work cut out for him on Homeland Security alone.
But in between playing Golf with his buddies and ramming legislation down the states throats' he doesn't seem to have adequate time to take on the threat posed by Isis and other Islamic militants seriously. It would seem that this massive organization of muslims dedicated to killing Christians and Jews is nothing more than "a few ragtag extremists"... nothing to be alarmed about.
It's absurd.
Given an adequate amount of time, I'm almost certain we will see another terror attack perpetrated by muslims in the U.S. - hopefully we can stop them, but it would seem to many that the perversity of the Islamic faith is such that stopping them entirely without mass deportations seems unlikely.
That's why I urge you to fight back.
Domestic Democracy United 2015
Friday, January 16, 2015
POTUS Promises To Veto Repub's Immigration Legislation: D.C. Dysfunction Continues
As many are loathe to note, there are quite a few immigrants in this country. Actually, even more importantly there are quite a few immigrants in europe as well. Immigration is a difficult concept to really understand... After all, we're always reminded - "We ARE a country of immigrants".
However, I think immigration-as-such really refers to, in europe, the muslim problem and in the U.S. the growing hispanic population. As such, what we're dealing with here is the paradigm of those who don't like these immigrants, don't want them here, believe these immigrants to be taking the native populations' jobs, and consider these immigrants to often be security risks - and those who believe that those people who believe such nonsense are rascist xenophobes etc.
Well, this seems to be playing itself out on the capitol, where house and senate repubs' first majority move has been to repeal 'Bama's writ of amnesty to illegal immigrants.
Now, the Regime has responded that the POTUS will give the final veto when the legislation comes to his desk after being passed by the repub majority house and senate.
The Dysfunction of D.C. has never been so apparent, and this move by the POTUS is infantile and unproductive. It proves that the bi-partisanship promised by both sides after last November's elections has degenerated into dry chaff and empty promises. Ole 'Bama needs to recognize that the will of the entire house and senate is representative of public opine, and his promise to veto what would effectively just allow I.C.E. to do it's job is simply throwing in the towel and saying, "You know what, all that effort and time and money put into this immigration legislation by the house and senate - FUCK IT".
Thanks a lot.
The fact is, a lot of the terrorism problem is connected to the immigration problem, and offering amnesty to illegal immigrants only perpetuates both problems, not to mention creates - often - a nightmare for Law Enforcement. I mean we've all seen just how criminal the hispanic counter-culture is, right? I mean jesus, there's gangs flowing over the border and now Obama wants to give their border jumper babies amnesty? It's patently ridiculous.
So all in all,
just another case of D.C. Dysfunction.
Guess we'll have to wait until the big election year to get anything done.
VOTE CHRISTIE!!!! DDU 2015
However, I think immigration-as-such really refers to, in europe, the muslim problem and in the U.S. the growing hispanic population. As such, what we're dealing with here is the paradigm of those who don't like these immigrants, don't want them here, believe these immigrants to be taking the native populations' jobs, and consider these immigrants to often be security risks - and those who believe that those people who believe such nonsense are rascist xenophobes etc.
Well, this seems to be playing itself out on the capitol, where house and senate repubs' first majority move has been to repeal 'Bama's writ of amnesty to illegal immigrants.
Now, the Regime has responded that the POTUS will give the final veto when the legislation comes to his desk after being passed by the repub majority house and senate.
The Dysfunction of D.C. has never been so apparent, and this move by the POTUS is infantile and unproductive. It proves that the bi-partisanship promised by both sides after last November's elections has degenerated into dry chaff and empty promises. Ole 'Bama needs to recognize that the will of the entire house and senate is representative of public opine, and his promise to veto what would effectively just allow I.C.E. to do it's job is simply throwing in the towel and saying, "You know what, all that effort and time and money put into this immigration legislation by the house and senate - FUCK IT".
Thanks a lot.
The fact is, a lot of the terrorism problem is connected to the immigration problem, and offering amnesty to illegal immigrants only perpetuates both problems, not to mention creates - often - a nightmare for Law Enforcement. I mean we've all seen just how criminal the hispanic counter-culture is, right? I mean jesus, there's gangs flowing over the border and now Obama wants to give their border jumper babies amnesty? It's patently ridiculous.
So all in all,
just another case of D.C. Dysfunction.
Guess we'll have to wait until the big election year to get anything done.
VOTE CHRISTIE!!!! DDU 2015
Saturday, January 10, 2015
POTUS Glaringly Inept At Facing The Terrorist Situation: DDU Calls For Accountability
Terror is everywhere.
Yet the President is on the golfcourse.
We face, potentially, one of the most difficult years in the war on terror in recent memory.
Yet the left still refuses to look the bull in the eye.
Christianity is under attack by radical Jihadist Islam.
Yet we still want to take away religious freedom in school and government.
It's a disaster. And that's what a terror attack is, an orchestrated disaster. Can we rely on the the most inexperienced POTUS of all time to protect the U.S. from another 9/11?
I wish the answer could sincerely be, yes.
And maybe it will be. After all, the pres can be incompetent and homeland security, police and military can still function adequately.
However, one comment by Mr. Obama from a while back - culled from the annals of Rush 106.1 - is disturbing in just how out of touch with mainstream America it is:
"The future does not belong too those who would blaspheme the prophet Muhammad..."
Well as someone pointed out, if one makes fun of Jesus or christianity - as is done OFTEN - we as civilized people don't respond violently! Why must these barbarians impose their supposed "law" on the West proper? Why are they so radicalized, to the point of committing suicide by cop, while taking every godfearing white person along with them? Why?
As I've repeated before in my blog, I've read full through half of the Koran -
and -
"KILL THE UNBELIEVER"
is repeated as mantra.
It's not that SOME muslims are violent and radical jihadists - it's that their entire religion has a predisposition for violent "law-as-such", and it's deathly serious.
I've heard one poll indicates that over 70 percent of muslims sympathize with al queda.
If you think, the same numbers would probably apply to the majority of the counterculturalist left - the same anti-establishmentarians that reveled in the Chaos in Ferguson. Probably the majority of THEM look at al queda as justified in it's jihad against the west!!!
Radicalism is radicalism, and islam is islam.
But Christ is offensive to both.
The idea that thou shalt not kill etc. is an alarming contrast to the truths of the so called "prophet" Muhammad, which has no similarly civilizing ethic of moral conduct.
So, in short;
"Smoke 'em if you got 'em, it's gonna be a long year."
-Brendan O'Connell DDU 2015
Yet the President is on the golfcourse.
We face, potentially, one of the most difficult years in the war on terror in recent memory.
Yet the left still refuses to look the bull in the eye.
Christianity is under attack by radical Jihadist Islam.
Yet we still want to take away religious freedom in school and government.
It's a disaster. And that's what a terror attack is, an orchestrated disaster. Can we rely on the the most inexperienced POTUS of all time to protect the U.S. from another 9/11?
I wish the answer could sincerely be, yes.
And maybe it will be. After all, the pres can be incompetent and homeland security, police and military can still function adequately.
However, one comment by Mr. Obama from a while back - culled from the annals of Rush 106.1 - is disturbing in just how out of touch with mainstream America it is:
"The future does not belong too those who would blaspheme the prophet Muhammad..."
Well as someone pointed out, if one makes fun of Jesus or christianity - as is done OFTEN - we as civilized people don't respond violently! Why must these barbarians impose their supposed "law" on the West proper? Why are they so radicalized, to the point of committing suicide by cop, while taking every godfearing white person along with them? Why?
As I've repeated before in my blog, I've read full through half of the Koran -
and -
"KILL THE UNBELIEVER"
is repeated as mantra.
It's not that SOME muslims are violent and radical jihadists - it's that their entire religion has a predisposition for violent "law-as-such", and it's deathly serious.
I've heard one poll indicates that over 70 percent of muslims sympathize with al queda.
If you think, the same numbers would probably apply to the majority of the counterculturalist left - the same anti-establishmentarians that reveled in the Chaos in Ferguson. Probably the majority of THEM look at al queda as justified in it's jihad against the west!!!
Radicalism is radicalism, and islam is islam.
But Christ is offensive to both.
The idea that thou shalt not kill etc. is an alarming contrast to the truths of the so called "prophet" Muhammad, which has no similarly civilizing ethic of moral conduct.
So, in short;
"Smoke 'em if you got 'em, it's gonna be a long year."
-Brendan O'Connell DDU 2015
Monday, December 22, 2014
Merry Christmas From Domestic Democracy United: Some Ruminations on Christ
"The stone that the builder refused shall become the end capstone."
The above adage is a paraphrase of biblical verse, found throughout many works of art and literature. Most people, though perhaps not consciously or actively, are familiar with this mysterious saying.
I myself have been ruminating on it's meaning for throughout the course of several years, and am happy to say found - and will impart unto you - the objective meaning behind this cryptic archetype...
But before I outright tell you what the 'stone that the builder refused' really IS, I ought to recount some of the various uses of this archetype have been that I've witnessed in my reading of the Bible and "Duncan's Rituals", a freemasonry ritual guide.
The "stone that the builder refused" becoming "the end cornerstone" is found most easily in the bible in one of the books of Peter, where Jesus the man tells a crowd of enraptured listeners a parable which I will paraphrase thusly:
"There once was a Landlord who owned land upon which tenants farmed crops.
When it came time to collect his rent, the Landlord sent his servant out to receive accounts payable.
The tenants killed the servant.
The Landlord was perplexed, so he sent his son out to collect.
The tenants killed his son.
So, when the Landlord went out himself to collect, what happened?" Jesus asked.
"Surely the landlord slew the tenants, etc." Everyone replied.
Jesus looked disappointed with them and in a way befitting a kind of reprimand of the crowd said:
"The stone that the builder refused shall become the end capstone"
...and somehow, everyone in the crowd repented and felt shame - because they knew Jesus was talking about them.
...or something to that effect.
confusing, huh?
Well, after some time spent witnessing just how central this end 'capstone' or 'cornerstone' parable is to Freemasonry (I myself have never attended a lodge but consider myself a freemason at heart), recounted repeatedly throughout the entirety of "Duncan's..." not to mention referenced in Dan Brown's "The Lost Symbol" in which the protagonist talks about how the founding fathers and framers would literally use stone refuse to ground the corners of capitol buildings, I must say - I was even more in the dark than the repentant crowd listening to Jesus in the book of Peter. I had to admit -
I didn't know what this recurring archetype meant!
And then I found it, just a day or so ago, buried somewhere in Ephesians.
It says....
....and merry christmas by the way.
The stone that the builder refused IS Jesus.
Think of the tale of The Passion.
God sent Jesus, his only begotten son, to give the world a glimpse of his grace and majesty.
But the builder, perhaps in this case Herod and ilk (whose tomb, btw, occupies a sizeable portion of Solomon's Temple), refused Him.
Yet now, as we all celebrate the birth of the Lord and Savior this Christmas, He has become the "end cornerstone" of the majority of Western Civilization proper!
There you have it, gift-wrapped for your Holidays...
For what it's worth,
not much
I suppose.
DDU 2014 RT
The above adage is a paraphrase of biblical verse, found throughout many works of art and literature. Most people, though perhaps not consciously or actively, are familiar with this mysterious saying.
I myself have been ruminating on it's meaning for throughout the course of several years, and am happy to say found - and will impart unto you - the objective meaning behind this cryptic archetype...
But before I outright tell you what the 'stone that the builder refused' really IS, I ought to recount some of the various uses of this archetype have been that I've witnessed in my reading of the Bible and "Duncan's Rituals", a freemasonry ritual guide.
The "stone that the builder refused" becoming "the end cornerstone" is found most easily in the bible in one of the books of Peter, where Jesus the man tells a crowd of enraptured listeners a parable which I will paraphrase thusly:
"There once was a Landlord who owned land upon which tenants farmed crops.
When it came time to collect his rent, the Landlord sent his servant out to receive accounts payable.
The tenants killed the servant.
The Landlord was perplexed, so he sent his son out to collect.
The tenants killed his son.
So, when the Landlord went out himself to collect, what happened?" Jesus asked.
"Surely the landlord slew the tenants, etc." Everyone replied.
Jesus looked disappointed with them and in a way befitting a kind of reprimand of the crowd said:
"The stone that the builder refused shall become the end capstone"
...and somehow, everyone in the crowd repented and felt shame - because they knew Jesus was talking about them.
...or something to that effect.
confusing, huh?
Well, after some time spent witnessing just how central this end 'capstone' or 'cornerstone' parable is to Freemasonry (I myself have never attended a lodge but consider myself a freemason at heart), recounted repeatedly throughout the entirety of "Duncan's..." not to mention referenced in Dan Brown's "The Lost Symbol" in which the protagonist talks about how the founding fathers and framers would literally use stone refuse to ground the corners of capitol buildings, I must say - I was even more in the dark than the repentant crowd listening to Jesus in the book of Peter. I had to admit -
I didn't know what this recurring archetype meant!
And then I found it, just a day or so ago, buried somewhere in Ephesians.
It says....
....and merry christmas by the way.
The stone that the builder refused IS Jesus.
Think of the tale of The Passion.
God sent Jesus, his only begotten son, to give the world a glimpse of his grace and majesty.
But the builder, perhaps in this case Herod and ilk (whose tomb, btw, occupies a sizeable portion of Solomon's Temple), refused Him.
Yet now, as we all celebrate the birth of the Lord and Savior this Christmas, He has become the "end cornerstone" of the majority of Western Civilization proper!
There you have it, gift-wrapped for your Holidays...
For what it's worth,
not much
I suppose.
DDU 2014 RT
Monday, November 24, 2014
Conservative Ascendancy: Why Republicans Won
By now I'm sure we're all familiar with the victory by conservatives in what was an historic midterm election. Republicans took more seats in the U.S. House, and now have control of the Senate - and now have their eyes locked on the big win in 2016, the Executive office. We've seen this kind of conservative ascendancy before in 2010, and now we've all - right and left - bore witness to the recent massive victory.
But one question remains...
Why did republicans win this time?
Well to put it succinctly, we won because the American people know we fight fair. We keep it above the belt, and we don't need the marxist controlled media doing our bidding to win an election. All it takes is a little honesty, good will and honorable discourse.
I think voters were a little astounded to find that the Democrat party that they knew has become, well, a little disingenuous. Think of the recent corruption stemming from Obamacare, with a lead Obamacare spokesman/cretin talking about how "transparency" was needed to keep people in the dark about the truth behind the Affordable Healthcare Act. If you didn't catch this little snippet, a major democrat operative went on the record about how "transparency" can be used to deceive the publik about Obamacare. disgusting.
I also think liberal's inherent elitism had something to do with the victory.
One can only drink in the snide and condescending tone of the majority of the left for so long without becoming, to put it mildly in my case, slightly contemptuous. And I think the polls showed this on election day. People were railing not only against the POTUS and his regime's policies, but against the entire culture of the left! We're sick of being talked down to by ignorant marxists.
And now the Repub party is marching on the offensive, vowing to fight the President's immigration platform and suing over the Affordable Healthcare Act. We did it. We won.
Now the real work begins.
RT STILLWELL DDDU 2014
- to my regular readers, all due apologies over my eric holder and d'souza pieces. I was having personal troubles at the time and if those pieces seemed angry and base, that is surely why. -
Thanks again.
But one question remains...
Why did republicans win this time?
Well to put it succinctly, we won because the American people know we fight fair. We keep it above the belt, and we don't need the marxist controlled media doing our bidding to win an election. All it takes is a little honesty, good will and honorable discourse.
I think voters were a little astounded to find that the Democrat party that they knew has become, well, a little disingenuous. Think of the recent corruption stemming from Obamacare, with a lead Obamacare spokesman/cretin talking about how "transparency" was needed to keep people in the dark about the truth behind the Affordable Healthcare Act. If you didn't catch this little snippet, a major democrat operative went on the record about how "transparency" can be used to deceive the publik about Obamacare. disgusting.
I also think liberal's inherent elitism had something to do with the victory.
One can only drink in the snide and condescending tone of the majority of the left for so long without becoming, to put it mildly in my case, slightly contemptuous. And I think the polls showed this on election day. People were railing not only against the POTUS and his regime's policies, but against the entire culture of the left! We're sick of being talked down to by ignorant marxists.
And now the Repub party is marching on the offensive, vowing to fight the President's immigration platform and suing over the Affordable Healthcare Act. We did it. We won.
Now the real work begins.
RT STILLWELL DDDU 2014
- to my regular readers, all due apologies over my eric holder and d'souza pieces. I was having personal troubles at the time and if those pieces seemed angry and base, that is surely why. -
Thanks again.
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Why Do Atheists Hate God So Much
Now,
I'm no psychologist of any sort, but I do notice - well, let's say "demeanors" in people.
But before I begin on this drafty subject, I'll quote Buckley when he said of the classroom,
"We narrow down on focus here to ... (people) ... who actively disparage religion, give it the silent treatment or treat it with supercilious dismissal."
- W.F.B. Jr
The demeanor of atheists is inevitably of the former sort.
They actively disparage religion. Look at the treatment Sarah Palin got as being a "Right-Wing Christian Nutbag". They give it the silent treatment, as if any mention of the christian variety sparks silent contempt and indignation. They treat it with supercilious disparagement and dismissal as Christian life being one of vanity, consumerism and ignorance.
It's all part of the "knee-jerk" reaction of atheists to bruck against Jesus as Messiah.
Why would that be offensive, or subject to any kind of criticism at all- IN A CHRISTIAN NATION.
And be warned fair reader, what we're witnessing in the middle east is HOLY WAR.
As Billy Graham said once,
"During the second coming of christ, god will have to intervene in human affairs, or we would have total racial genocide."
I think that's true of these times... our age.
But case in point,
Atheists hate god and have a gut reaction to the mere mention of jesus to such a degree that it seems almost as if they have a natural predisposition for persecution of christians! It's almost as if, they find Christ as Messiah so offensive that they simply must spit on and disparage it. Why would they look at Creationists with such AUTOMATIC disdain??!?
Why?
It's only as if we're saying in some sense that the current science is as it was before Galileo.
What with Quantum Theory (aka atheism in methodology) and other - remember - theories taking hold as cultural currency, it's hard for a Christion to not question why atheism is so detrimental to the Spirit of the U.S.
But this is besides the point.
The fact is,
Dialectical Materialism aka Marxism is simply Hegel's "MIND/SPIRIT" formula without god. Hegel was very specific about his hermeneutics. Geist was to be awed at with a view of Christ as Messiah.
Yet dialectical materialism and all of it's amazing social darwinist discoveries have spurned only sour and venemous anti-patriotism. We can't let them win.
The republican party is the party of Christianity.
The Democrat Establishment Machine almost exclusively serves the Evolutionist mindset.
Let's look to the bible for answers...
"In the beginning, God created the earth, the heavens, and all that in them is"
Pretty deep stuff.
Atheists decidedly overtly renounce this biblical law-as-such when they take on the evolutionary worldview.
We need to stop it in the textbooks first,
change the climate of academic intolerance towards Creationists and Intelligent Design adherents,
and win the battle for scientific rebirth, scientific regeneration, and biblical Reason.
TY
RT DDU 2014
I'm no psychologist of any sort, but I do notice - well, let's say "demeanors" in people.
But before I begin on this drafty subject, I'll quote Buckley when he said of the classroom,
"We narrow down on focus here to ... (people) ... who actively disparage religion, give it the silent treatment or treat it with supercilious dismissal."
- W.F.B. Jr
The demeanor of atheists is inevitably of the former sort.
They actively disparage religion. Look at the treatment Sarah Palin got as being a "Right-Wing Christian Nutbag". They give it the silent treatment, as if any mention of the christian variety sparks silent contempt and indignation. They treat it with supercilious disparagement and dismissal as Christian life being one of vanity, consumerism and ignorance.
It's all part of the "knee-jerk" reaction of atheists to bruck against Jesus as Messiah.
Why would that be offensive, or subject to any kind of criticism at all- IN A CHRISTIAN NATION.
And be warned fair reader, what we're witnessing in the middle east is HOLY WAR.
As Billy Graham said once,
"During the second coming of christ, god will have to intervene in human affairs, or we would have total racial genocide."
I think that's true of these times... our age.
But case in point,
Atheists hate god and have a gut reaction to the mere mention of jesus to such a degree that it seems almost as if they have a natural predisposition for persecution of christians! It's almost as if, they find Christ as Messiah so offensive that they simply must spit on and disparage it. Why would they look at Creationists with such AUTOMATIC disdain??!?
Why?
It's only as if we're saying in some sense that the current science is as it was before Galileo.
What with Quantum Theory (aka atheism in methodology) and other - remember - theories taking hold as cultural currency, it's hard for a Christion to not question why atheism is so detrimental to the Spirit of the U.S.
But this is besides the point.
The fact is,
Dialectical Materialism aka Marxism is simply Hegel's "MIND/SPIRIT" formula without god. Hegel was very specific about his hermeneutics. Geist was to be awed at with a view of Christ as Messiah.
Yet dialectical materialism and all of it's amazing social darwinist discoveries have spurned only sour and venemous anti-patriotism. We can't let them win.
The republican party is the party of Christianity.
The Democrat Establishment Machine almost exclusively serves the Evolutionist mindset.
Let's look to the bible for answers...
"In the beginning, God created the earth, the heavens, and all that in them is"
Pretty deep stuff.
Atheists decidedly overtly renounce this biblical law-as-such when they take on the evolutionary worldview.
We need to stop it in the textbooks first,
change the climate of academic intolerance towards Creationists and Intelligent Design adherents,
and win the battle for scientific rebirth, scientific regeneration, and biblical Reason.
TY
RT DDU 2014
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Free Dinesh D'Souza
You fucking ratbastard yankee communists.
You've sentenced hero and patriot Dinesh D'Souza to 8 months, plus 30,000 plus community service. FUCK YOU.
You fucking commie stooges. God will repay you in full.
You fucking jew yorkers. go the fuck back to yr wicked israelite homeland, which is - de facto - hell.
You fucked up this time.
"Campaign Finance Reform" FAIL.
Fucking democrats can't handle someone shaking you up a litte?
If Dinesh D'Souza had lived in fayeteville, NC - he never would have been charged.
[But because he lived in the land of limited soda with plenty of JEW wine, he was tried and sentenced according to the BS yankee ANTI-GOD ANTI-LAW.]
FUCK YOU JEW YORK.
We will have justice.
\
Fuckin jew york dems are for shit.
You've sentenced hero and patriot Dinesh D'Souza to 8 months, plus 30,000 plus community service. FUCK YOU.
You fucking commie stooges. God will repay you in full.
You fucking jew yorkers. go the fuck back to yr wicked israelite homeland, which is - de facto - hell.
You fucked up this time.
"Campaign Finance Reform" FAIL.
Fucking democrats can't handle someone shaking you up a litte?
If Dinesh D'Souza had lived in fayeteville, NC - he never would have been charged.
[But because he lived in the land of limited soda with plenty of JEW wine, he was tried and sentenced according to the BS yankee ANTI-GOD ANTI-LAW.]
FUCK YOU JEW YORK.
We will have justice.
\
Fuckin jew york dems are for shit.
Monday, September 22, 2014
Science: Enemy of Christians Since Newton
Traditionally, one introduced to the sciences was someone also well versed in Christian doctrine. Newton, as in the discoverer of Gravity, famously was also devoutly Christian. Newton the man, when not in heaven looking down upon the farce that modern science has become and chortling to the angels and himself, must just spin around in his grave all day.
Now, science is 99 % atheist, with it's infusion of the psychological sciences etc.
What a sad state of affairs.
The pinnacle of human involvement with knowledge-as-such has developed into an anti-god, anti-christian leftist cult devoid of understanding in matters of importance. Congratulations atheists.
If a scientist is not an evolutionist, he cannot sustain in the current climate of academic intolerance towards christianity. It reminds me of "God's Not Dead", the recent film inspired by Jonathan Edwards' "Sinners In The Hands of An Angry God" that shows how wise men of the academic die; as fools. Now, not only is a teachers tenure in jeopardy if they dare to stand in opposition to the cult of Evolutionary Science - but students also, unequivocally, must go through that ring of fire as well.
Shape up academia.
Stop the mandated Evolutionary Science indoctrination.
It's not like Evolutionary Theory wasn't responsible for the holocaust in ww2 or anything...
Right?
The fact is, the problem of the sciences is explained almost right off the bat in MY textbook: THE BIBLE.
Adam and Eve sinned spiritually when they did, what now?
I'd have to assume all readers are WAY ahead of me.
I like the point in "God's Not Dead" where the young protag gets his prof to admit the awful truth: He HATES God.
The fact is, most of the sciences have hatred of the divine built into their very structure. They implicitly (though rarely explicitly) have as their morality one of radical atheism.
Yet we continue to use their "research" - Oft proven to be a farce - to justify social matters.
I say, let the nerds have THEIR WORLD, let us Christians have ours.
And for fucks sake,
Science -
Quit it.
DDU 2014
Now, science is 99 % atheist, with it's infusion of the psychological sciences etc.
What a sad state of affairs.
The pinnacle of human involvement with knowledge-as-such has developed into an anti-god, anti-christian leftist cult devoid of understanding in matters of importance. Congratulations atheists.
If a scientist is not an evolutionist, he cannot sustain in the current climate of academic intolerance towards christianity. It reminds me of "God's Not Dead", the recent film inspired by Jonathan Edwards' "Sinners In The Hands of An Angry God" that shows how wise men of the academic die; as fools. Now, not only is a teachers tenure in jeopardy if they dare to stand in opposition to the cult of Evolutionary Science - but students also, unequivocally, must go through that ring of fire as well.
Shape up academia.
Stop the mandated Evolutionary Science indoctrination.
It's not like Evolutionary Theory wasn't responsible for the holocaust in ww2 or anything...
Right?
The fact is, the problem of the sciences is explained almost right off the bat in MY textbook: THE BIBLE.
Adam and Eve sinned spiritually when they did, what now?
I'd have to assume all readers are WAY ahead of me.
I like the point in "God's Not Dead" where the young protag gets his prof to admit the awful truth: He HATES God.
The fact is, most of the sciences have hatred of the divine built into their very structure. They implicitly (though rarely explicitly) have as their morality one of radical atheism.
Yet we continue to use their "research" - Oft proven to be a farce - to justify social matters.
I say, let the nerds have THEIR WORLD, let us Christians have ours.
And for fucks sake,
Science -
Quit it.
DDU 2014
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Repub Legislators Dare To Oppose Using Food Stamps To Buy Weed
Last week a major legislation has been debated, again under-reported by the lamestream media. It was about how, in states that have the legalized use of marijuana, ethnics are using their EBT or food stamp debit cards to buy over the counter marijuana. the repubs, obviously, were in opposition to using taxpayer money for ethnics to buy marijuana.
Look.
I smoke.
But using taxpayer money, basically given out for free to the majority of ethnics, to consume pot is just wrong. the repub legislators were right to try and stop it.
And now, senator Dick Durban is saying that just giving amnesty to more ethnics will solve everything.
Why do those stodgy repub senators dare oppose amnesty?
I'll tell you why.
Because the ethnics serf-class is part and parcel with gang/criminal activity.
Now team 'Bama wants to let them all inside the U.S., give them citizenship, and - NOW - skim taxpayer money so that they can buy marijuana and listen to rap all goddamned day.
I say, send 'em back.
Decriminalization, in terms of industry, may or may not be a terrible idea.
Personally, I think you can keep the pot out of the hands of teens in highschool more easily should it be decriminalized - as everyone who's ever been in highschool knows it is FAR easier to purchase marijuana than to buy beer underage.
But this is beside the point.
The D.E.M., is ACTUALLY opposing stopping ethnics from using their government mandated EBT cards to buy weed in states where it is legal.
At what point does a democrat just stop and say to themselves - "I'm wrong".
The fact is, never.
But for those "libertarian leaning" dems there is a hope.
Or there would be, if the media weren't run by communist columbia schooled journalists and socialist alinsky acolytes.
It's just a farce.
Send the mexi-cartel babies back.
Stop ethnics from abusing welfare and EBT,
and for the love of god
Vote Nixon.
DDU 2014
Look.
I smoke.
But using taxpayer money, basically given out for free to the majority of ethnics, to consume pot is just wrong. the repub legislators were right to try and stop it.
And now, senator Dick Durban is saying that just giving amnesty to more ethnics will solve everything.
Why do those stodgy repub senators dare oppose amnesty?
I'll tell you why.
Because the ethnics serf-class is part and parcel with gang/criminal activity.
Now team 'Bama wants to let them all inside the U.S., give them citizenship, and - NOW - skim taxpayer money so that they can buy marijuana and listen to rap all goddamned day.
I say, send 'em back.
Decriminalization, in terms of industry, may or may not be a terrible idea.
Personally, I think you can keep the pot out of the hands of teens in highschool more easily should it be decriminalized - as everyone who's ever been in highschool knows it is FAR easier to purchase marijuana than to buy beer underage.
But this is beside the point.
The D.E.M., is ACTUALLY opposing stopping ethnics from using their government mandated EBT cards to buy weed in states where it is legal.
At what point does a democrat just stop and say to themselves - "I'm wrong".
The fact is, never.
But for those "libertarian leaning" dems there is a hope.
Or there would be, if the media weren't run by communist columbia schooled journalists and socialist alinsky acolytes.
It's just a farce.
Send the mexi-cartel babies back.
Stop ethnics from abusing welfare and EBT,
and for the love of god
Vote Nixon.
DDU 2014
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
THE COMMUNIST CONSPIRACY: AT LARGE
The fact is, communists hate america.
The overarching communist conspiracy knows no bounds. When McCarthy tried to stem the tide of soviet spies, all communists, back in the fifties - he was character assassinated. He was called a drunk, he was called all kinds of filthy names from liberal progressives, and ultimately - his legacy is not one of ridding the U.S. government of soviet spy's - which he ACTUALLY DID - but of that of a "witch hunter".
Shame on you, the left.
the fact is, there are currently communist spies working for the U.S. government. From my own analysis, I would say over 1,000 of them.
We need to stop the commies, before they destroy everything we hold dear.
They clearly have a large grasp of the sociological and psychological. So we need combat them in their home turf... Academic circles of ho hum intellectuals.
These atheist "global warming" believing nutbags are sick in the head,,,,
and they need to be stopped.
go to JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY for more info on how to stop the communist conspiracy.
The overarching communist conspiracy knows no bounds. When McCarthy tried to stem the tide of soviet spies, all communists, back in the fifties - he was character assassinated. He was called a drunk, he was called all kinds of filthy names from liberal progressives, and ultimately - his legacy is not one of ridding the U.S. government of soviet spy's - which he ACTUALLY DID - but of that of a "witch hunter".
Shame on you, the left.
the fact is, there are currently communist spies working for the U.S. government. From my own analysis, I would say over 1,000 of them.
We need to stop the commies, before they destroy everything we hold dear.
They clearly have a large grasp of the sociological and psychological. So we need combat them in their home turf... Academic circles of ho hum intellectuals.
These atheist "global warming" believing nutbags are sick in the head,,,,
and they need to be stopped.
go to JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY for more info on how to stop the communist conspiracy.
Monday, September 15, 2014
Eric Holder Is a Shit Eating Nigger
Eric Holder is, de facto, waging war on whites.
I say, as a southerner, burn a cross in his lawn.
Joking and frank terminology aside, Eric Holder looks like a fascist because he IS a nigger fascist.
He wants to assault the white populous with his hook line and sinker social justice.
Hey mustachio'd nigger in DC, go go go go to cuba you fucking commie.
I wouldn't be surprised if he is a soviet spy for the communist party.
Remember the arms drawdown with Russia, looked back upon with a sense of the idiocy of D.C.?
Probably a soviet spy counter-op facilitated by alinskyites like Eric Holder.
the National Review warns against playing the race card, but the fact is - a police officer - known in modern terminology as "pig" or simply "cop" - is being persecuted by this fucking house piece of garbage.
Fuck off back to nigreristan Eric Holder.
Go back to africa, like your black panther compatriots.
Fucking faggot supporter.
ERIC HOLDER IS A FAGGOT.
...and you know he is. He's like that rowdy house nigger from way back.
I say, let's take him and Obama out in 2016.
btw - 2014 midterms are pretty much over. welcome to the white states of the nigger D.C. of former america.
Repent sinner.
You can't stand on the same rock where moses stood, so stand the fuck down and let the white's take the grim reality of the country you've decimated.
RT STILLWELL
I say, as a southerner, burn a cross in his lawn.
Joking and frank terminology aside, Eric Holder looks like a fascist because he IS a nigger fascist.
He wants to assault the white populous with his hook line and sinker social justice.
Hey mustachio'd nigger in DC, go go go go to cuba you fucking commie.
I wouldn't be surprised if he is a soviet spy for the communist party.
Remember the arms drawdown with Russia, looked back upon with a sense of the idiocy of D.C.?
Probably a soviet spy counter-op facilitated by alinskyites like Eric Holder.
the National Review warns against playing the race card, but the fact is - a police officer - known in modern terminology as "pig" or simply "cop" - is being persecuted by this fucking house piece of garbage.
Fuck off back to nigreristan Eric Holder.
Go back to africa, like your black panther compatriots.
Fucking faggot supporter.
ERIC HOLDER IS A FAGGOT.
...and you know he is. He's like that rowdy house nigger from way back.
I say, let's take him and Obama out in 2016.
btw - 2014 midterms are pretty much over. welcome to the white states of the nigger D.C. of former america.
Repent sinner.
You can't stand on the same rock where moses stood, so stand the fuck down and let the white's take the grim reality of the country you've decimated.
RT STILLWELL
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
Protecting The Unborn: Right To "Choose"?
As I'm oft guilty of repeating,
the fact is - the unborn need protecting.
I've heard the mockings of the left of Right To Lifers, and it's detrimental to the current dialectic.
Monty Python mocking Right To Lifers in their "Every Sperm Is Sacred" adage, the scoffing that leftists proffer for anyone who dares to stand against baby genocide.
It's sick.
The fact is, again, the unborn need protecting.
If I was to say to you, that probably about 10,000 babies a day get killed because of institutional eugenics, would you believe me? Would you cry?
I would cry for the deceased.
I would.
The fact is, the unborn need protecting
Eugenics-as-such is the undying principle of the left, manifested in their extremist activists as well as everyday joe-and-jane-complicit-in-murder. It's a sad fact, but direly misrepresented by the publik zeitgeist.
The fact is, the unborn need protecting.
ASIA - slaughtering innocent children.
SEX ED - caught promoting eugenics.
BIO 101 - we're all just animals anyways.
Adv. PHI - Actually no, animals deserve more rights than humans because they're so free of the human disease.
It would be a farce, weren't it de facto genocide of babies.
I've even heard there is a hip worldview being promoted amongst the intelligentsia that after-birth abortions are, well - "literally the equivalent of a standard abortion".
I say tell these sick bastards in the Senate to repeal Roe v. Wade.
Seriously though,
let's all take a moment to consider a single death, which is a an unmeasurable cost.
Now let's consider 10 deaths.
Now let's consider 100 deaths.
Now consider 1000 deaths.
Now consider 10,000 deaths.
Now consider that this is merely "per day"....
....from abortions, or properly, eugenics.
Thanks you
RT STILLWELL DOMESTIC DEMOCRACY UNITED 2012
the fact is - the unborn need protecting.
I've heard the mockings of the left of Right To Lifers, and it's detrimental to the current dialectic.
Monty Python mocking Right To Lifers in their "Every Sperm Is Sacred" adage, the scoffing that leftists proffer for anyone who dares to stand against baby genocide.
It's sick.
The fact is, again, the unborn need protecting.
If I was to say to you, that probably about 10,000 babies a day get killed because of institutional eugenics, would you believe me? Would you cry?
I would cry for the deceased.
I would.
The fact is, the unborn need protecting
Eugenics-as-such is the undying principle of the left, manifested in their extremist activists as well as everyday joe-and-jane-complicit-in-murder. It's a sad fact, but direly misrepresented by the publik zeitgeist.
The fact is, the unborn need protecting.
ASIA - slaughtering innocent children.
SEX ED - caught promoting eugenics.
BIO 101 - we're all just animals anyways.
Adv. PHI - Actually no, animals deserve more rights than humans because they're so free of the human disease.
It would be a farce, weren't it de facto genocide of babies.
I've even heard there is a hip worldview being promoted amongst the intelligentsia that after-birth abortions are, well - "literally the equivalent of a standard abortion".
I say tell these sick bastards in the Senate to repeal Roe v. Wade.
Seriously though,
let's all take a moment to consider a single death, which is a an unmeasurable cost.
Now let's consider 10 deaths.
Now let's consider 100 deaths.
Now consider 1000 deaths.
Now consider 10,000 deaths.
Now consider that this is merely "per day"....
....from abortions, or properly, eugenics.
Thanks you
RT STILLWELL DOMESTIC DEMOCRACY UNITED 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)