I'd like to talk for a moment about republican conservatism. We all know, I would suppose unless you live under a rock in a cave, the belief system of the conservative Republican Party as we currently understand it. We know the presumptions about Republicanism that we have been conditioned by marxist media and common blooded academic textbook authorship into believing. We know, we think, what an archetypal 'conservative' looks like.
Well,
Maybe we should imagine an elephant, with it's much coveted and massacred barbarically for 'ivory', and ask "what is an ivory tower to an animal like an elephant"? Maybe we should ask, what is a republican conservative southerner? Perhaps we should ask ourselves, what are the current stigmatizations presented by communist propaganda about conservatism?
What does it mean to be a conservative?
Adam Smith had a great deal to say about the proper role of independent nations' governance and how it is to go about the basic financial systems of sales and purchases of goods and services. I haven't studied the genius of Adam Smith and his contribution to our systems of governance in America to the extent that many scholars have. However, I would say that the idea of freedom as relates to a system of exchange or a fruited plane in which we live as being, in a sense, prescient philosophically in such a way as to define the way the world works & operates functionally. Adam Smith's conservatism is central to the true American ideal that our founding fathers established in the founding documents.
But this is still to underestimate how important the conceptualization and systemization of Freedom as such really are. Our founders and framers in America rebelled, radically, against monarchicalism and taxation by a foreign enemy force. Why? I can speculate freely, although I wasn't there in the 18th century (my forefathers, however, were), and say it had to do with a kind of annoyance.
A kind of recognition that tyrants neglect their responsibility to their country and people endemically is central to why the founders framed the constitution as they did. A kind of realization that all bread comes from some else's bread. A kind of serious consideration of morality that requires a deep distrust of those who proclaim to be doing the good, righteous will of God, as the Catholic Church had done throughout the darkest ages of history, while consistently doing evil.
The honorable and just comportment of the U.S. founders to avoid the inordinate malfeasances of tyranny is the philosophical tradition of the West, and the primary reason why we began an experiment in attempting to establish and ordain a country in which a President of the United States of America could avoid this grim primordial 'all to human' impulse of sinners to facilitate power over innocent women and children and citizens of all kinds as a tyrannical corrupt progressive slave morality.
So what did our founders believe in?
Did they believe in allowing all technologies and trade with foreign adversaries?
no.
Did they believe in allowing taxation en masse without due diligence and representation?
no.
Did they believe in social engineering?
no.
They had a firm moral involvement with a kind of righteous indignation and revolutionarily violent anger directed at collectivism. What does that mean? Well, one doesn't need an encyclopedia to figure it out. It would be described as 'hive mind'. It would be described as a kind of 'tyranny'. It seemed to be that manner of governance which cared more about the needs of the many, outweighing the virtue of the few - or 'one'.
Hence,
"out of the many, one"
This indicates not only that the traditional and only acceptable identity of American culture and procedure is a form of individualism rather than collectivism, but also that they had a kind of intent to enshrine the rights of innocent civilians in such a way as to avoid authoritarian tyranny. Long term governance must have been something our founding framers intended to enshrine as being comprised as being a form of governance that should serve the will of the everyday innocent civilian.
It is a shame that the more our country's sovereignty is corrupted by foreign trade, technology and influence we become less of a republic, and more of a communist sham. Every day, we allow this brute blooded communism & socialism to ruin the lives of innocent civilians in our republic. Due to the Democrat, or liberal, lack of moral certainty by way of religious objectivity being subverted by atheist muck-racking, it would seem we are losing, or perhaps at the current era have completely lost, the Freedom our revolution fought to bring to the U.S.A. These fruited plains.
So,
Vote Nicky Haley,
Because democrats are so collectivist they actually don't care about philosophy, reject philosophy as oppressive, and even fight against anyone who speaks explicitly in such a way as to call the communist emperor a vainglorious golden ass.
DDU24
No comments:
Post a Comment