I TRANSCRIBED A TRANS ACTIVIST FOR CONTRACT WORK

 ...Here's what she said. 

Her name is Jen x as far as I understand it. She was part of an acid house group from the '80s called "Psychic TV".

This particular interview was done by none other than the media icon Douglas rushkoff, who I worked for as a contract assistant director. 

So I & I, much like Selassie I would have done in a Gonzo bid for supremacy in the Algiers, much like Paul after selling out the church and changing his name, I transcribed what I believe could legitimately be an antichrist. 

Just throwing my red meat to the dogs.

So this Gen x claims to have invented techno as we now know it in the 80s, with her band Psychic TV.

I transcribed the interview that Douglas rushkoff did with Gen x.  Gen x, like many transgenders, is not ashamed to talk about her sexuality. Much of the description that was done, was with her Butch lesbian girlfriend.  She seemed to be a really common sensical type of Butch lesbian.  But what Gen x talked about, apart from dating her, was how in love she was. 

So in effect, Gen x talked about what she called "The Pandrogyn".  It's essentially as far as I remember it although I was pretty fucked up on hemp at the time, that the generation's years had found a new type of activism. A type of activism in which the coalescence of male and female, is met in a coalescence of ideology. 

So what I say is that Gen x talked about the intermixing of masculine and feminine. About the meeting of polar opposites of heteronormal and completely fag tolerant. 

So what I would say is that really in many respects as a Christian myself, all sexuality, whether heteronormal or homosexual or anywhere in between, is considered to be aesthetically immoral as such. 

So in many respects, it's more of a diatribe against why sexuality is immoral in the first place. 

I guess that kind of counts for very little in a day and age in which sexuality is almost kind of a cult, however the cultism aside, and occultism aside, I believe that perpetrators of sexual immorality deserve the worst type of punishment. 

So when I say that homosexuality is inherently immoral, as I did to my some punks recently, I'm met with the fair amount of backlash. 

But that is a sad fact of life, that just as much as sodomy is a sin, oral sex - heteronormal or homosexual or bisexual -  all oral sex is technically sodomy. So I tell people that this is very important if we wish to curry God's favor. 

Sodomy is not just when you put it up the pooper. 

Sodomy also, much maligned, is any type of oral sex. 

However I would like to just brag for a brief moment live into my social media device known as a cell phone.  

I don't have the internet at my house. 

But right here, just talk to text thing, I'd like to brag without any edits. 

We have as a Republican party accomplished one relevant thing in the past year. 

Care to guess what it is? 

No? 

?

??

???

I mean I'm talking just any relevant real policy decision making and consequence. 

?

I'm talking like anything, that the Republican party has done? 

They made porn illegal, for all intents and purposes. 

As many porno masturbators know, at a certain point several months ago, all free porn on the internet was cut off. I'd have to assume it's just in my state? However I have reason to believe all free access porn is completely off. The spigot has been turned to closed on the free underage porn market. 

So that's what I'd like to end that with. 

Kind of forgot where I was going with that. 

But like yeah like Republicans killed porno. 

It's up to you to decide if that's a good thing or a bad thing I don't know? 

But yeah so like I just think like it's so cool that we can all rally around the idea of the sociological principle that is first and foremost in analyzing what's going on in the world in terms of news and media. 

Which is this, 

If there is a media story in which the perpetrator of a crime is of a particular category or race or religion, it sociologically and therefore scientifically does not in any real sense actually reflect on the category of race or religion of the perpetrator. 

That's sociology 101. 

So just remember just because something looks like something else racially? 

Often times it's very much distinguished, 

But not necessarily recognized. 

So remember just because somebody who does a crime is a black guy? 

It's scientifically does not reflect on black people as a race. 

If somebody who does a crime is latinx Guy? 

It sociologically does not reflect on all latinx people. 

And if one is Republican?

It does not reflect on Trump whatsoever. 

This is trickle down top down economics type of free market capitalism.

So remember vote democracy, 

Vote Republican. 

God bless America, 

And God bless the state of Israel!