Many people, at this point in U.S. conscience and falling from grace, feel perfectly free from guilt or remorse in lue of an untenable allegiance to collectivism in practical application. The price for this may be subject to payment. What will we pay for sticking our heads in the sand in light of the encroachment upon Freedom as understood by those who remember pre-Regime American life?
What will we pay?
The debt, of course, won't be nearly as severe as the price of the damages in Oklahoma after the recent multi-billion dollar tragedy that befell those in the mid-west.
But it will be something which we may never be capable of retrieving... True "grace-as-such".
The grace of civility in matters of security and conflict domestically may be gone with the wind.
The truth and rights meant for our everyday lives by the Founding Fathers is something which could lose it's real sense of spirituo-religious grace, a peculiar existent sentiment honored and revered by most all in the U.S. for centuries. Sometimes this sense of grace was understood to be the legitimate and prevalent sentiment known as "spirit". This recognition of spirit, in the sense of, say, school spirit, as the primary mode of being-in-the-world has maintained an order of spirituality for decades.
If this sounds at all susceptible to undermining instincts it's because it very much is!
The "spirit" of a nation, of a culture, of an individual is fragile.
Grace, embodied or in some sort of differing abstract sense, is not merely finesse and mastery, though it is that in a sense. It is the innocence of majesty. Majesty, in it's pristine and noble condition outside of the constraints of disobedience. We are in danger of losing this child-like sense of majesty and spirit. Why?
Precisely this.
Tom Brokaw appearing on television directly after the Tragedy in MA. proclaiming it was time to live in a "new america" with higher security. Telling us, as the voice of a generation of boomers, to "get used to it".
The key to understanding the degeneracy of Grace is in the conceptualizations in Negative Rights, or the right to be uninhibited by government. Our freedom-as-such, in a negative sense, preserves our innocence and integrity as humans. Human's who are distinct from the "lower forms" restricted by brute sin and instinctual degradation. We stand in danger of degenerating to the status of birds in a park...
"It's like you once commented on the birds... they were all grabbing for scraps of food."
We're losing the grace intended for us by our ancestral forefathers of olde.
How can we save it?
By being graceful, each of us, in our own lives.
saying that, here are two examples of grace I've created for i-tunes:
mozart "switched on"
bach "switched on"
Monday, June 3, 2013
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
The Answer to Our Problems: Why Communism is Terrorism, Not Acceptable
A COMMUNIST PLOT AGAINST THE FREE WORLD POLICE
BRENDAN O'Connell: Thanks sir. I have some information. I shall be glad to tell the committee what I have learned and hope it will dull the point of the communist sickle.
I was born in Richmond VA and educated in Pittsboro NC @ Pittsboro Elementary, Horton Middle School, and Northwood High School.
The imperative is that the New World Police be kept currently informed of the subversive activities of the Communist Conspiracy and how this effects the rights of citizens of the Free World, with the Communist Conspiracy's activities and how they turn us into the unwitting tools or victims of a specific campaign of subversion.
Many of us know what is back of the mob violence which we have been considering. It is probable, however, that few of the demonstrators realize that they are victims of a war that is being waged in the free world today. It is a life and death struggle between communism, which makes the people the slaves of the state, and free world democracy, in which the state carries out the will of the people.
Our police are among the foremost gaurdians of freedom and thus a major target of the communists. The better the force, the greater it's efficiency, the bigger it's competence in preserving the peace, the more vital it is for the communists to destroy it. I understand the commitee's desire that I outline the tactics of the comminust subversion and describe several case histories illustrating their techniques for attacking police.
The international Communist organization provides a training manual for espionage agents in which their duties are enumerated. This pamphlet was seized in europe. Let me paraphrase the tasks assigned to agents in one of the countries of the free world.
First, make investigation and report on the activities of the police and security services.
Second, investigate and repress those security organizations that support the government.
I would assume this remains till today.
Third, find ways to infiltrate the police and security organizations to steal documents-particularly those recording their knowledge of communism-and to destroy everything of value.
I beleive that the manual is specific in those instructions.
I have an example. Let me describe briefly the history of the Communist war against the police in one of the major countries of the free world.
Until the Communist politicians started to create trouble in recent years there had never been an incident on the record showing political interference with the administration of the police force.
The communist technique has been directed primarily toward the discrediting the police in the eyes of the people.
The communists, of course, try to tell the people that police are in the pay of foreign powers. Efforts were made to penetrate the police and recruit personel in headquarters and provicial offices in security units. Further, a smear campaign attempted to discredit the leaders among the rank and file. The more outstanding and upright the senoir police officers, the more certain they were to become a communist target.
The above example is a rather awesome example of Communist techniques against the police... Fortunately I can report that in this instance they failed. The fine traditions of the free world police have been restored in this nation and we're on a road to true Freedom and Democracy.
As you know, there are two general aspects of Communist activity:
(1) The subversion aspect where efforts are made to penetrate and control every phase of political, economic and cultural life of a country.
(2) the militant aspect which involves agitation, demonstrations, riots, insurrection, and rebellion. Police must have have a capability of dealing with both the subversive and militant aspects of communism. This requires an internal security mechanism which provides an investigative apparatus capable of identifying and developing information on subversive individuals and organizations and capable of neutralizing their activities. It also is necessary that highly trained and highly specialized investigative apparatus be supported by a larger force capable of controlling demonstration, riots, and other civil disorders.
Communism will work openly and legally where it can. But it will work secretly and illegally where it must. Its capability for conspiratorial work largely accounts for the survival of the International Communist conspiracy.
Their international movement has developed a system of defensive measures to protect itself against the police, against intelligence agencies and against a hostile public. Knowledge of party activities is carefully organized. An intraparty detective service and a controlled commision guard against police penetration.
Plans for offensive action are carefully devised and except for minor local adaptations constitute a detailed blueprint for worldwide agitation.
None of us should feel that the task is easy, nor that victory will be quick. The commies are dangerous, feindishly clever, ruthless, and determined enemies. Their potential loot? The biggest possible... Control of the world. They will not give up the goal as long as they last.
DDU - NC, 2013
(DEVISED FROM THE BIRCHERS)
BRENDAN O'CONNELL
BRENDAN O'Connell: Thanks sir. I have some information. I shall be glad to tell the committee what I have learned and hope it will dull the point of the communist sickle.
I was born in Richmond VA and educated in Pittsboro NC @ Pittsboro Elementary, Horton Middle School, and Northwood High School.
The imperative is that the New World Police be kept currently informed of the subversive activities of the Communist Conspiracy and how this effects the rights of citizens of the Free World, with the Communist Conspiracy's activities and how they turn us into the unwitting tools or victims of a specific campaign of subversion.
Many of us know what is back of the mob violence which we have been considering. It is probable, however, that few of the demonstrators realize that they are victims of a war that is being waged in the free world today. It is a life and death struggle between communism, which makes the people the slaves of the state, and free world democracy, in which the state carries out the will of the people.
Our police are among the foremost gaurdians of freedom and thus a major target of the communists. The better the force, the greater it's efficiency, the bigger it's competence in preserving the peace, the more vital it is for the communists to destroy it. I understand the commitee's desire that I outline the tactics of the comminust subversion and describe several case histories illustrating their techniques for attacking police.
The international Communist organization provides a training manual for espionage agents in which their duties are enumerated. This pamphlet was seized in europe. Let me paraphrase the tasks assigned to agents in one of the countries of the free world.
First, make investigation and report on the activities of the police and security services.
Second, investigate and repress those security organizations that support the government.
I would assume this remains till today.
Third, find ways to infiltrate the police and security organizations to steal documents-particularly those recording their knowledge of communism-and to destroy everything of value.
I beleive that the manual is specific in those instructions.
I have an example. Let me describe briefly the history of the Communist war against the police in one of the major countries of the free world.
Until the Communist politicians started to create trouble in recent years there had never been an incident on the record showing political interference with the administration of the police force.
The communist technique has been directed primarily toward the discrediting the police in the eyes of the people.
The communists, of course, try to tell the people that police are in the pay of foreign powers. Efforts were made to penetrate the police and recruit personel in headquarters and provicial offices in security units. Further, a smear campaign attempted to discredit the leaders among the rank and file. The more outstanding and upright the senoir police officers, the more certain they were to become a communist target.
The above example is a rather awesome example of Communist techniques against the police... Fortunately I can report that in this instance they failed. The fine traditions of the free world police have been restored in this nation and we're on a road to true Freedom and Democracy.
As you know, there are two general aspects of Communist activity:
(1) The subversion aspect where efforts are made to penetrate and control every phase of political, economic and cultural life of a country.
(2) the militant aspect which involves agitation, demonstrations, riots, insurrection, and rebellion. Police must have have a capability of dealing with both the subversive and militant aspects of communism. This requires an internal security mechanism which provides an investigative apparatus capable of identifying and developing information on subversive individuals and organizations and capable of neutralizing their activities. It also is necessary that highly trained and highly specialized investigative apparatus be supported by a larger force capable of controlling demonstration, riots, and other civil disorders.
Communism will work openly and legally where it can. But it will work secretly and illegally where it must. Its capability for conspiratorial work largely accounts for the survival of the International Communist conspiracy.
Their international movement has developed a system of defensive measures to protect itself against the police, against intelligence agencies and against a hostile public. Knowledge of party activities is carefully organized. An intraparty detective service and a controlled commision guard against police penetration.
Plans for offensive action are carefully devised and except for minor local adaptations constitute a detailed blueprint for worldwide agitation.
None of us should feel that the task is easy, nor that victory will be quick. The commies are dangerous, feindishly clever, ruthless, and determined enemies. Their potential loot? The biggest possible... Control of the world. They will not give up the goal as long as they last.
DDU - NC, 2013
(DEVISED FROM THE BIRCHERS)
BRENDAN O'CONNELL
Thursday, May 23, 2013
DDU DIALUP -DNC TEA Protester confronts the Commie Conspiracy in NC
harlot charlotte
Thursday, May 2, 2013
Academia, Government, Media and Science: The Four Pillars of Deceit
Science. Irrefutable.
Academia. Required.
Media. Everywhere.
Government. Universally despised and sparsely refuted.
These four pillars of what is appropriately described as the deceit of Citizens in our time are all similar in one respect.
I'll ask you, readers and thinkers, to ponder what School, Science, the Media and Government all hold common...
Ready?
All of the pillars of deceit are, to a point, mandatory. As in, extreme stigma and sanctioning if the pillar's resultant morality are not internalized, adhered to in convention and philosophy and, to a certain extent, propounded as intrinsically correct publicly.
God forbid one decisively and with determination oppose them!
Let's start our dialectic of the corrupt fruit of science with it's resultant ideologies. One accepts science, one - except in rare and slightly forgivable circumstances - disregards religious tradition. One studies science, one - with little exception - disregards all tradition. One studies science, one - with or without exalting morality - condemns the right. Inevitably.
In today's climate of intellectual sloven obedience, science has become and is becoming and had been simply a quasi-ethics of obfuscation packaged to dullards and those impressively "special" students as an assurance of profundity in thought and action.
In truth, it is the anti-thesis of such inclinations and, at it's worst and most oxen-like, simply those of an ignoble slave-cast turning the valuations of our existent class system on it's head. I'd say it was "revaluation", yet that would seem to give to those of the decidedly scientific persuasion the honor that normally befits actual philosophy and artistic creation. Drudging up psychologically engineered data from some un-vetted textbook publisher would fall quite short of such sentiments, it would seem.
"What about Newton?" I can only assume isn't a retort that would spring to mind for most of the scientific faithful.
Despite early Christian science's clearly important contributions, I've encountered a surprisingly disproportionate number of oxen-like dullards who, amidst their wandering and impotent dialectic, seem to feel perfectly fine dismissing the discovery of why things go towards the ground without any compunction whatsoever.
I suppose E=mc2 IS so profound that early discoveries of functional Truth aren't salient, prescient, or worth scientific inquiry.
No.
Just open up while we shove Evolutionary Theory down your hapless throat.
Now take Academia, which proceeds from science-as-such.
I have no criticism of Academia that would be anything apart from trite.
All I'll mention is - I dropped out of High School upon an urging from my conscience. I, goaded into satiating the beast of private/public "education" went back to the local college for those as dispassionate about selling my soul for academic pedigree as myself discovered - de facto - the ideology of eugenics being taught within the first day of a class. I suppose I should've taken the notion that the world is overfull and deserves "depopulation for environmental concerns" seriously, but I did not. I walked away immediately.
So this simple question to you!
What is the result of not walking away?
Government, as we all know, is tied to all things and rests in recompense.
I don't think it takes too serious of an ideological leap to take seriously the inclination to view government, in some sense, as deceitful. In fact, this pillar of deceit lies in truth.
So, despite many misgivings by myself, I should note that government is, objectively, the least harmful pillar of deceit. It remains a deceit with intentions pure. It becomes much less for many and much more for a few. Spirit, it would seem, is transparency...
Yet, the absolute limits of government are defined by the constitution of America-as-such. These limits are the only epistemology I've known as being at all legitimate in the sense of pragmatico-teleological priority. The priority of service to that which redeems one in the light of a fallen earth. What is this redemption, if not derived from government and defined by church?
Finally, the final and most sinful pillar of deceit: the media.
Media is so influential in the bathtubs of the world that many and many more make a substantial amount of sustenance perpetuating the myth that the State controlled media is legit.
It is not.
The state controlled media is not merely increasingly disappointing as a form of entertainment for weary world-goers.... It is, by great broad strokes and greater than cartoon-like hyperbole, a trainwreck delivered to the Publik on a daily basis - one failing to do that which was intended for it by early disciples of the Eternal Flame such as Ed Bernays.
Why is the Media-as-such failing so glaringly?
By virtue of the progressive "evolving" influence of the previous Pillars.
We literally gulp, digest, shit - and then open up for a heaping dose of Deceit.
Science: A pillar of deceit.
Academia: A pillar of deceit.
Media: A pillar of deceit.
Government: Glaringly without sovereignty and without transparency or accountability.
Nice house you built. Furnishings are so garish and upper middle class I'd like to move out, but will more than likely simply sit amidst their trash and lack of class. Reminds me a bit of....
Reminds me a bit of the house old Mr. Jimmy Carter built.
You remember that one? The house with the annoyingly gaush 70's decor?
At least we're ALL doing something good!
At least we can sleep at...
RT Stillwell
Academia. Required.
Media. Everywhere.
Government. Universally despised and sparsely refuted.
These four pillars of what is appropriately described as the deceit of Citizens in our time are all similar in one respect.
I'll ask you, readers and thinkers, to ponder what School, Science, the Media and Government all hold common...
Ready?
All of the pillars of deceit are, to a point, mandatory. As in, extreme stigma and sanctioning if the pillar's resultant morality are not internalized, adhered to in convention and philosophy and, to a certain extent, propounded as intrinsically correct publicly.
God forbid one decisively and with determination oppose them!
Let's start our dialectic of the corrupt fruit of science with it's resultant ideologies. One accepts science, one - except in rare and slightly forgivable circumstances - disregards religious tradition. One studies science, one - with little exception - disregards all tradition. One studies science, one - with or without exalting morality - condemns the right. Inevitably.
In today's climate of intellectual sloven obedience, science has become and is becoming and had been simply a quasi-ethics of obfuscation packaged to dullards and those impressively "special" students as an assurance of profundity in thought and action.
In truth, it is the anti-thesis of such inclinations and, at it's worst and most oxen-like, simply those of an ignoble slave-cast turning the valuations of our existent class system on it's head. I'd say it was "revaluation", yet that would seem to give to those of the decidedly scientific persuasion the honor that normally befits actual philosophy and artistic creation. Drudging up psychologically engineered data from some un-vetted textbook publisher would fall quite short of such sentiments, it would seem.
"What about Newton?" I can only assume isn't a retort that would spring to mind for most of the scientific faithful.
Despite early Christian science's clearly important contributions, I've encountered a surprisingly disproportionate number of oxen-like dullards who, amidst their wandering and impotent dialectic, seem to feel perfectly fine dismissing the discovery of why things go towards the ground without any compunction whatsoever.
I suppose E=mc2 IS so profound that early discoveries of functional Truth aren't salient, prescient, or worth scientific inquiry.
No.
Just open up while we shove Evolutionary Theory down your hapless throat.
Now take Academia, which proceeds from science-as-such.
I have no criticism of Academia that would be anything apart from trite.
All I'll mention is - I dropped out of High School upon an urging from my conscience. I, goaded into satiating the beast of private/public "education" went back to the local college for those as dispassionate about selling my soul for academic pedigree as myself discovered - de facto - the ideology of eugenics being taught within the first day of a class. I suppose I should've taken the notion that the world is overfull and deserves "depopulation for environmental concerns" seriously, but I did not. I walked away immediately.
So this simple question to you!
What is the result of not walking away?
Government, as we all know, is tied to all things and rests in recompense.
I don't think it takes too serious of an ideological leap to take seriously the inclination to view government, in some sense, as deceitful. In fact, this pillar of deceit lies in truth.
So, despite many misgivings by myself, I should note that government is, objectively, the least harmful pillar of deceit. It remains a deceit with intentions pure. It becomes much less for many and much more for a few. Spirit, it would seem, is transparency...
Yet, the absolute limits of government are defined by the constitution of America-as-such. These limits are the only epistemology I've known as being at all legitimate in the sense of pragmatico-teleological priority. The priority of service to that which redeems one in the light of a fallen earth. What is this redemption, if not derived from government and defined by church?
Finally, the final and most sinful pillar of deceit: the media.
Media is so influential in the bathtubs of the world that many and many more make a substantial amount of sustenance perpetuating the myth that the State controlled media is legit.
It is not.
The state controlled media is not merely increasingly disappointing as a form of entertainment for weary world-goers.... It is, by great broad strokes and greater than cartoon-like hyperbole, a trainwreck delivered to the Publik on a daily basis - one failing to do that which was intended for it by early disciples of the Eternal Flame such as Ed Bernays.
Why is the Media-as-such failing so glaringly?
By virtue of the progressive "evolving" influence of the previous Pillars.
We literally gulp, digest, shit - and then open up for a heaping dose of Deceit.
Science: A pillar of deceit.
Academia: A pillar of deceit.
Media: A pillar of deceit.
Government: Glaringly without sovereignty and without transparency or accountability.
Nice house you built. Furnishings are so garish and upper middle class I'd like to move out, but will more than likely simply sit amidst their trash and lack of class. Reminds me a bit of....
Reminds me a bit of the house old Mr. Jimmy Carter built.
You remember that one? The house with the annoyingly gaush 70's decor?
At least we're ALL doing something good!
At least we can sleep at...
RT Stillwell
Friday, April 19, 2013
The Terror is Over, says Fox News : NSA Warns of Playing Junior G - Man
I am loathe to type anything whatsoever after the vicious and alarming tragedy which struck the city of Boston last wed. However, we can all - left and right - breathe easily now. The terrorist threat is no more, unequivocally. Our country is now, as of the capture (and exhibition of the identity of) of the terrorists who shook America to it's boots, authentically free from immediate threat. Boston, objectively, has been vindicated.
The major story, as I once commented on in regards to an Occupy protest I soured and spat at directly at the DNC, is not the Lamestream picture being pumped into every goof-box of every hardworking citizen of the world; in fact, the major story is one which no one may ever become aware of!
The major story's are the behind the scenes Police work of Gov'ment agencies far and wide and - to be sure - in the country's city of Boston. This is the only interesting angle to many of us, and is surely something I wouldn't be qualified to speculate on. But the distance between average Harold free citizen and the Boston city and people-hood has been removed.
We
are
all
Bostonians.
...Today it seems.
But the victory of State and/or Federal government agencies in capturing these viciously leftist Russians should and, according to DDU INFO HEADQUARTERS in Raleigh, NC - ahem, will signal for many that we are out of danger. The fear is now unnecessary.
Domestic Democracy United,
Founder and Member on Friday, after the attack which forever shook our nation and ex shoom-gang member Barack "Hussein" Obama's administry and elect.
"Thank you, I would like to say that I'm praying for all of the people of Boston and the people of Texas, not to even speak of the fine officials of State and/or Federal Government. I absolutely apologize for my sick joke -
Which is, of course this blog. The only thing I would like to be official about myself is the valuations made within this blog. No, I don't like to say these things - I'm just doing my duty (no pun intended). Thanks for reading, but I recommend not viewing this page anymore. Please go to www.nationalreview.com for all substantive political commentary for the time being."
- Brendan O'Connell aka RT Stillwell aka Clip & Carbine aka John Oswald aka Emo Headache aka Aecorpn
DDU OFFICIAL STATEMENT HERE:
http://www.politalk2.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-cold-war-aint-over.html
^Indicates that Politalk's use of Private Investigation philosophy and methodology was plenty keen to the threat of Russian/Ethnic terrorist/communist and it's presence in the worldhood of the world. Russia - no offense, we don't like you. DDU wants you to stop visiting this page. Ihonestlypityyoupeople.
The major story, as I once commented on in regards to an Occupy protest I soured and spat at directly at the DNC, is not the Lamestream picture being pumped into every goof-box of every hardworking citizen of the world; in fact, the major story is one which no one may ever become aware of!
The major story's are the behind the scenes Police work of Gov'ment agencies far and wide and - to be sure - in the country's city of Boston. This is the only interesting angle to many of us, and is surely something I wouldn't be qualified to speculate on. But the distance between average Harold free citizen and the Boston city and people-hood has been removed.
We
are
all
Bostonians.
...Today it seems.
But the victory of State and/or Federal government agencies in capturing these viciously leftist Russians should and, according to DDU INFO HEADQUARTERS in Raleigh, NC - ahem, will signal for many that we are out of danger. The fear is now unnecessary.
Domestic Democracy United,
Founder and Member on Friday, after the attack which forever shook our nation and ex shoom-gang member Barack "Hussein" Obama's administry and elect.
"Thank you, I would like to say that I'm praying for all of the people of Boston and the people of Texas, not to even speak of the fine officials of State and/or Federal Government. I absolutely apologize for my sick joke -
Which is, of course this blog. The only thing I would like to be official about myself is the valuations made within this blog. No, I don't like to say these things - I'm just doing my duty (no pun intended). Thanks for reading, but I recommend not viewing this page anymore. Please go to www.nationalreview.com for all substantive political commentary for the time being."
- Brendan O'Connell aka RT Stillwell aka Clip & Carbine aka John Oswald aka Emo Headache aka Aecorpn
DDU OFFICIAL STATEMENT HERE:
http://www.politalk2.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-cold-war-aint-over.html
^Indicates that Politalk's use of Private Investigation philosophy and methodology was plenty keen to the threat of Russian/Ethnic terrorist/communist and it's presence in the worldhood of the world. Russia - no offense, we don't like you. DDU wants you to stop visiting this page. Ihonestlypityyoupeople.
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Empathy and Compassion: Sentiments of Heart
"Until in anger he
And his cheeks are flushed with shame,
Unholy every note of his song."
- Friedrich Holderlin
Each of us in our own way is shut off from Sympathy, by virtue of our having been estranged from that which is closest to our core senses, one is torn in the alienation of having become. And yet, the bound meaning of world and morals renders void an indominable sense of kinship.
The clown of the corporeal etherealizations, "heaven on earth" ethic and posture, remain even until tomorrow the unbecoming anti-natural inclinations inherent in love as an interlude between lust, happiness, and the mortal coil. One would observse such inclinations in the animal kingdom.
We always understand in a direct, basic sense what the apprehension of subjective selfhood entombs as our objective worldliness. If you have no television, the idea of subjective selfhood seems agape in it's obtrusive ideological candor. The esotericism entrenched in neo-pragmatism makes it's own limits explicit in lasting absolute obscenity.
This obscene alienation is the heart of Sympathy, Empathy and Compassion.
Post-Deconstructionism posits that for-the-sake-of this is meant that of God's mercy, and should one posit anything whatsoever regarding this Enlightenment-Era constitution, need nothing remain posture nor recompense. The need of being-alongside-others is made concrete in the formulations of the classical-as-such. The necessity to be-for-others makes concrete the drive for classical "Rights".
For the only regress of an intolerable hatred for tolerance-as-such is in a kind of trace. The trace of worldhood, as an entity, making explicit the worldliness of a totality-of-tools. The ready-to-hand makes itself known to us in light of ontical-ontological priority. What is a service, lest it be in the name of priority?
Let's go to another point of recompense.
That of the delimiting of dasein in the world.
The limits of dasein.
The limit of knowledge is merely that which makes itself known in the immediate.
Everyday dasein is that which is true. Alienation, the fixture of servitude and malice. Thinking beyond self...
The limits remain.
The easy way out remains beyond, in fact, the limitations of delimiting.
From "Variations on the Devil"
And his cheeks are flushed with shame,
Unholy every note of his song."
- Friedrich Holderlin
Each of us in our own way is shut off from Sympathy, by virtue of our having been estranged from that which is closest to our core senses, one is torn in the alienation of having become. And yet, the bound meaning of world and morals renders void an indominable sense of kinship.
The clown of the corporeal etherealizations, "heaven on earth" ethic and posture, remain even until tomorrow the unbecoming anti-natural inclinations inherent in love as an interlude between lust, happiness, and the mortal coil. One would observse such inclinations in the animal kingdom.
We always understand in a direct, basic sense what the apprehension of subjective selfhood entombs as our objective worldliness. If you have no television, the idea of subjective selfhood seems agape in it's obtrusive ideological candor. The esotericism entrenched in neo-pragmatism makes it's own limits explicit in lasting absolute obscenity.
This obscene alienation is the heart of Sympathy, Empathy and Compassion.
Post-Deconstructionism posits that for-the-sake-of this is meant that of God's mercy, and should one posit anything whatsoever regarding this Enlightenment-Era constitution, need nothing remain posture nor recompense. The need of being-alongside-others is made concrete in the formulations of the classical-as-such. The necessity to be-for-others makes concrete the drive for classical "Rights".
For the only regress of an intolerable hatred for tolerance-as-such is in a kind of trace. The trace of worldhood, as an entity, making explicit the worldliness of a totality-of-tools. The ready-to-hand makes itself known to us in light of ontical-ontological priority. What is a service, lest it be in the name of priority?
Let's go to another point of recompense.
That of the delimiting of dasein in the world.
The limits of dasein.
The limit of knowledge is merely that which makes itself known in the immediate.
Everyday dasein is that which is true. Alienation, the fixture of servitude and malice. Thinking beyond self...
The limits remain.
The easy way out remains beyond, in fact, the limitations of delimiting.
From "Variations on the Devil"
Monday, April 1, 2013
Beyond Collectivism: Anti-Capitalistic Ideologies and Where They Stand
I've talked a bit recently about the ideologies stemming from early philosophers from the young Hegelian school of thought, and tied it to the general term, collectivism. To focus this in the broader spectrum of various ideologies, I will be giving a short bucket list:
1) Communism - This ideology places all of the power of a country or state in the hands of government. Left Wing.
2) Anarchism - No Government. Right Wing.
3) Libertarianism - There is a role for government, but it should be strictly limited. Right Wing.
4) Tea Party - a Centrist Position. Neither right nor left wing.
5) Soft Socialism - Refers to a "Mixed economy" in line with the european model. Left Wing.
6) Fascism - A form of socialism. Left Wing.
Some, such as the tea party and libertarianism are explicitly pro-capitalism. Others such as Fascism, Anarchism, and Communism are implicitly anti-capitalism. Soft Socialism, as such, is neither explicitly anti-capitalism nor implicitly pro-capitalism.
The spectrum, in degree's of extremity of position, consists of the following.
<---communism -="" :="" anarchism---="" fascism="" libertarianism="" party="" socialism="" soft="" tea="">
All of those on the left side are collectivist ideologies and all those on the right side are individualist philosophies. In fact, if one were to gauge the political spectrum as such, from communism on the farthest left to anarchism on the farthest right - one would seem to be, with the political orientation in our age as it is, conducting some perverse form of Criminology.
Truly, with the exception of the Tea Party and Soft Socialism, this would be an apt judgement in any capitalistic system worthy of its salt.
DDU INFORMATION HEADQUARTERS
1) Communism - This ideology places all of the power of a country or state in the hands of government. Left Wing.
2) Anarchism - No Government. Right Wing.
3) Libertarianism - There is a role for government, but it should be strictly limited. Right Wing.
4) Tea Party - a Centrist Position. Neither right nor left wing.
5) Soft Socialism - Refers to a "Mixed economy" in line with the european model. Left Wing.
6) Fascism - A form of socialism. Left Wing.
Some, such as the tea party and libertarianism are explicitly pro-capitalism. Others such as Fascism, Anarchism, and Communism are implicitly anti-capitalism. Soft Socialism, as such, is neither explicitly anti-capitalism nor implicitly pro-capitalism.
The spectrum, in degree's of extremity of position, consists of the following.
<---communism -="" :="" anarchism---="" fascism="" libertarianism="" party="" socialism="" soft="" tea="">
All of those on the left side are collectivist ideologies and all those on the right side are individualist philosophies. In fact, if one were to gauge the political spectrum as such, from communism on the farthest left to anarchism on the farthest right - one would seem to be, with the political orientation in our age as it is, conducting some perverse form of Criminology.
Truly, with the exception of the Tea Party and Soft Socialism, this would be an apt judgement in any capitalistic system worthy of its salt.
DDU INFORMATION HEADQUARTERS
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Component Collectivist Culture: It's Ideology and How It Changes Our Lives
Today, I'd like to introduce a key to understanding and apprehending the serious and dire consequences of collectivism.
That term is what I've coined Component Collectivism.
Component Collectivism is a neo-collectivist worldview rooted in a dysfunctional and pathological neo-Hegelianistic ideology which is mostly known for being directly tied to the philosophy of Marx, who himself was a young Hegelian (or 'neo'-hegelian). This is to be starkly contrasted with the self proclaimed "Old Hegelians"; these early students of George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, who is generally recognized as being the most influential philosophe in the entirety of Western Philosophy's history, took his"dialectic" to mean an almost anti-thesis to the broad notion of dialectical materialism and- yea, the "hard" notional inclination to view history in terms of evolution as such. Old Hegelians viewed, according to Robert Solomon (R.I.P.), his dialectic as more an application of Christianity to the methodology of authorship. Anyone keen to Hegel knows, quite simply, that every discipline at every college/university in America and elsewhere is directly derived and indirectly imprinted from and with GWF's stamp and mark. Unequivocally.
The early neo-hegelians, amongst which were the first proto-marxists, had quite a different view of the meaning and functional hands-on utilization's of Hegel's tremendously powerful hermeneutics and Christian theological breakthroughs.
Again, Robert Solomon (author of "In The Spirit of Hegel") surmised the neo-hegelian's formulations as defined by the man himself - Karl Marx.
1) Analyze Hegel as science.
2) Remove "geist" from the equation/formula.
3) Replace "geist" with "Materialism".
By materialism as such is indicated the following: Geist, or spirit, is no longer the central organizing moral formulation. Rather, material goods (i.e. products, computers, phones, homes) determine how a society organizes their cultural focus.
And we all know the webster definition of Marxism; as out of date and irrelevant as it is in our age. Materials are essentially owned by government not individuals, hence irrevocably betraying the most basic and overlooked philosophy of our nation's founding...
That God grants us the freedom to pursue acquisition of property as well as- yea, the general pursuit of happiness. The National Review recently wrote of this "happiness" clause in the constitution to signify directly, in the context of when it was written, to farmers that they had the right to endeavor to buy more property. A bit out-dated and dusty - but in light of Dialectical Materialism, one might glean what the Founding Fathers were attempting to do. The "Happiness" clause is basically and truly a 'fail safe'.
A genius one at that!
Well, fast forward into the early 1900's. Early progressives such as Richard T. Ely and John Dewey along with a slew of proto-marxist disciples endeavored to apply their vision of Dialectical Materialism to the then burgeoning American Politik and Gov'ment.
This is nothing, I assure you beloved reader, like anything an NPR listening neo-progressive can conjur to mind from the last Terry Gross snippet on some far removed FDR rumour.
This was absolutely, in the same sense that Noam "Mr. MIT" Chomsky decried for an entire generation of young Che rebels the horror of defining a Corporation as an individual, a near takeover of our sovereign government by - basically and slightly humorously - "Ze Germans".
All of these leading figures of the early progressive movement were literally trained within the borders of pre-war Germany. All of them learning the scientific (not to mention psychological) methods of inculcating into a society, that is - OUR society, the treasonous philosophy of Dialectical Materialism.
What fruit did their highly successful endeavors yield?
How did this fruit taste and to what degree was it "poisonous"?
Bitter as hell, and with the venom of a viper -
1) Poll Taxes for poor Scotch/Irish and Blacks.
2) Literacy Tests that kept the newly emancipated Blacks from voting.
3) Segregation of the newly emancipated Blacks into ghettos and labor camps.
The fact that the progressive (or "leftist") tide sweeping the South coincided with the darkest moments of the repression of "negros" obviously and painfully belies their current commitment to all things multi-cult. Though, one - even in the age of 'Bama and the Regime - can still see the heritage of the early elitist intellectuals. One can see it in the very notion of that ardently fascist cliche - "Progressive".
In fact, the early engineers of all things Darwinian did facts 1-3 institutionally and with scientific rigor precisely because of 'progress' as such. They believed that the uneducated were, to a point, incapable of understanding freedom or living "free-as-such" lives until they had been sufficiently "Civilized". Their sociological excursions coupled with remarks about the poor and uneducated's (and I quote) "savage blood" etc. reveal an altogether colloquial attitude towards the (and I quote) "inferior races".
In fact, one leading neo-hegelian progressive even went so far as to say (paraphrase) that "the idea that newly emancipated slaves could live in freedom worked [direct quote] 'disaster' and was [direct quote] 'dogmatism'."
Far removed, I'd say, from today's "pragmatic compassion".
Frederick Douglass would probably, in kind, respond "Good Man. Bit off the top."
Fast forward, if you will, once more. To today's age and Politik.
Collectivism has been distilled, through the overthrow of science by neo-darwinists trained in the fine art of profound coffee table quantum physics chattering and tittering, not to mention bulling and cowing, into the deconstruction of the Component as such and the stratification of this verstehen into Collective consciousness. That Component, in a technological era of increasingly rapid advances in the technology of Hardware-as-such, is to be understood to be a Post-Deconstructionist account of the popular abstraction amongst sophomoric students in colleges and universities of the "single particle" or, more to a point, the ancient metaphysical cliche "mote".
Each "mote", in the concrete modern sense, can then be taken from deconstruction and comported (so to speak) in whichever direction our Ideologue Kings desire. Generally, much to the discredit of the Left's "cause", this direction is one which leads the voter down a narrow corridor to a shallow slope of moral and ethical erosion that opens up into an iced-over pond in which the voter is gently but firmly urged to walk to the center and sit down. Shouting from the safety of land, they then yell to the poor soul: "SPIN!"
Component Collectivism could be adequately understood as a "call", understood in the classical Christian sense, which is not of God nor Christian Tradition.
I.E. The removal of "Spirit" from the equation/formula of GWF and it's replacement with - let's just say - thin ice.
I'd say it were diabolical if that didn't understate the real and irrefutable treason that Marxism inherently entails.
Thank you!
RT Stillwell of the Birchers
http://www.jbs.org/issues-pages/support-your-local-police
That term is what I've coined Component Collectivism.
Component Collectivism is a neo-collectivist worldview rooted in a dysfunctional and pathological neo-Hegelianistic ideology which is mostly known for being directly tied to the philosophy of Marx, who himself was a young Hegelian (or 'neo'-hegelian). This is to be starkly contrasted with the self proclaimed "Old Hegelians"; these early students of George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, who is generally recognized as being the most influential philosophe in the entirety of Western Philosophy's history, took his"dialectic" to mean an almost anti-thesis to the broad notion of dialectical materialism and- yea, the "hard" notional inclination to view history in terms of evolution as such. Old Hegelians viewed, according to Robert Solomon (R.I.P.), his dialectic as more an application of Christianity to the methodology of authorship. Anyone keen to Hegel knows, quite simply, that every discipline at every college/university in America and elsewhere is directly derived and indirectly imprinted from and with GWF's stamp and mark. Unequivocally.
The early neo-hegelians, amongst which were the first proto-marxists, had quite a different view of the meaning and functional hands-on utilization's of Hegel's tremendously powerful hermeneutics and Christian theological breakthroughs.
Again, Robert Solomon (author of "In The Spirit of Hegel") surmised the neo-hegelian's formulations as defined by the man himself - Karl Marx.
1) Analyze Hegel as science.
2) Remove "geist" from the equation/formula.
3) Replace "geist" with "Materialism".
By materialism as such is indicated the following: Geist, or spirit, is no longer the central organizing moral formulation. Rather, material goods (i.e. products, computers, phones, homes) determine how a society organizes their cultural focus.
And we all know the webster definition of Marxism; as out of date and irrelevant as it is in our age. Materials are essentially owned by government not individuals, hence irrevocably betraying the most basic and overlooked philosophy of our nation's founding...
That God grants us the freedom to pursue acquisition of property as well as- yea, the general pursuit of happiness. The National Review recently wrote of this "happiness" clause in the constitution to signify directly, in the context of when it was written, to farmers that they had the right to endeavor to buy more property. A bit out-dated and dusty - but in light of Dialectical Materialism, one might glean what the Founding Fathers were attempting to do. The "Happiness" clause is basically and truly a 'fail safe'.
A genius one at that!
Well, fast forward into the early 1900's. Early progressives such as Richard T. Ely and John Dewey along with a slew of proto-marxist disciples endeavored to apply their vision of Dialectical Materialism to the then burgeoning American Politik and Gov'ment.
This is nothing, I assure you beloved reader, like anything an NPR listening neo-progressive can conjur to mind from the last Terry Gross snippet on some far removed FDR rumour.
This was absolutely, in the same sense that Noam "Mr. MIT" Chomsky decried for an entire generation of young Che rebels the horror of defining a Corporation as an individual, a near takeover of our sovereign government by - basically and slightly humorously - "Ze Germans".
All of these leading figures of the early progressive movement were literally trained within the borders of pre-war Germany. All of them learning the scientific (not to mention psychological) methods of inculcating into a society, that is - OUR society, the treasonous philosophy of Dialectical Materialism.
What fruit did their highly successful endeavors yield?
How did this fruit taste and to what degree was it "poisonous"?
Bitter as hell, and with the venom of a viper -
1) Poll Taxes for poor Scotch/Irish and Blacks.
2) Literacy Tests that kept the newly emancipated Blacks from voting.
3) Segregation of the newly emancipated Blacks into ghettos and labor camps.
The fact that the progressive (or "leftist") tide sweeping the South coincided with the darkest moments of the repression of "negros" obviously and painfully belies their current commitment to all things multi-cult. Though, one - even in the age of 'Bama and the Regime - can still see the heritage of the early elitist intellectuals. One can see it in the very notion of that ardently fascist cliche - "Progressive".
In fact, the early engineers of all things Darwinian did facts 1-3 institutionally and with scientific rigor precisely because of 'progress' as such. They believed that the uneducated were, to a point, incapable of understanding freedom or living "free-as-such" lives until they had been sufficiently "Civilized". Their sociological excursions coupled with remarks about the poor and uneducated's (and I quote) "savage blood" etc. reveal an altogether colloquial attitude towards the (and I quote) "inferior races".
In fact, one leading neo-hegelian progressive even went so far as to say (paraphrase) that "the idea that newly emancipated slaves could live in freedom worked [direct quote] 'disaster' and was [direct quote] 'dogmatism'."
Far removed, I'd say, from today's "pragmatic compassion".
Frederick Douglass would probably, in kind, respond "Good Man. Bit off the top."
Fast forward, if you will, once more. To today's age and Politik.
Collectivism has been distilled, through the overthrow of science by neo-darwinists trained in the fine art of profound coffee table quantum physics chattering and tittering, not to mention bulling and cowing, into the deconstruction of the Component as such and the stratification of this verstehen into Collective consciousness. That Component, in a technological era of increasingly rapid advances in the technology of Hardware-as-such, is to be understood to be a Post-Deconstructionist account of the popular abstraction amongst sophomoric students in colleges and universities of the "single particle" or, more to a point, the ancient metaphysical cliche "mote".
Each "mote", in the concrete modern sense, can then be taken from deconstruction and comported (so to speak) in whichever direction our Ideologue Kings desire. Generally, much to the discredit of the Left's "cause", this direction is one which leads the voter down a narrow corridor to a shallow slope of moral and ethical erosion that opens up into an iced-over pond in which the voter is gently but firmly urged to walk to the center and sit down. Shouting from the safety of land, they then yell to the poor soul: "SPIN!"
Component Collectivism could be adequately understood as a "call", understood in the classical Christian sense, which is not of God nor Christian Tradition.
I.E. The removal of "Spirit" from the equation/formula of GWF and it's replacement with - let's just say - thin ice.
I'd say it were diabolical if that didn't understate the real and irrefutable treason that Marxism inherently entails.
Thank you!
RT Stillwell of the Birchers
http://www.jbs.org/issues-pages/support-your-local-police
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Leftist Pathology: Why the Progressive Cabal Is Near Criminal
This indictment, which is based primarily in a piece in the NR which I reported on last year regarding one Mr. Saul Alinsky and his mob connections, is following an inquiry into the role of Religion in the public square. The founders were quite clear on the freedom to speak what one had on ones conscience; and I've found evidence of unconstitutionality if not criminality regarding progressive ideology. Like the 'mob', the left is conspiratorially committed to silence in questions of their interpretation of Biblical truth. Further, this silence often conceals a committment to Alinskian "social justice" or proto-communism.
Saul Alinsky is a man who created what conservatives have decried publicly; a little understood phrase "community organizing". Obama himself has said "I'm still organizing". What does organizing mean for Mr. Obama?
Legally representing an organization which had to close it's doors due to a scandal involving setting up whorehouses for underage illegal immigrants, or ACORN.
He acted as lawyer for ACORN during his up-and-coming years, representing an organization which was set up by Alinsky acolytes.
Alinsky's tactics could be seen in the 2012 election, in which fraud coupled with organized labor was implemented by a supposedly 'sovereign' government to "get out the vote". Alinsky, you must understand, learned his tactics of manipulation from the mob. And Barack Obama's "chicago-style" politics have followed suit with a viciousness not seen in any previous administration.
And those kool-aid drinkers on the left have no sense of humility whatsoever when it comes to disallowing other's expressions of Christian philosophy/theology - perhaps with the exception of the perfunctory 'pope talk' with fellow automatons of the anti-god.
The very phrase, Jesus is Lord, spoken publicly elicits criticism, scoffing, or ethical condemnation.
This is due to the Leftist Cabal literally enslaving the population. Enslaving them with their mind-numbing ideology. Enslaving them with the creation of their wicked imaginations. Enslaving them with their ideology.
It all began in the early 1900's when early progressive thinkers trained in 'neo-hegelian' philosophy (i.e. marxist philosophy) began to take control of America. They believd that freedom came not from God but from the Government.
Ever since, they have sought to make every gain possible, with the ends always justifying their evil means.
So, how is this criminal? How is this pathological?
Collectivism itself is an ideology of pathology.
RT Stillwell
Saul Alinsky is a man who created what conservatives have decried publicly; a little understood phrase "community organizing". Obama himself has said "I'm still organizing". What does organizing mean for Mr. Obama?
Legally representing an organization which had to close it's doors due to a scandal involving setting up whorehouses for underage illegal immigrants, or ACORN.
He acted as lawyer for ACORN during his up-and-coming years, representing an organization which was set up by Alinsky acolytes.
Alinsky's tactics could be seen in the 2012 election, in which fraud coupled with organized labor was implemented by a supposedly 'sovereign' government to "get out the vote". Alinsky, you must understand, learned his tactics of manipulation from the mob. And Barack Obama's "chicago-style" politics have followed suit with a viciousness not seen in any previous administration.
And those kool-aid drinkers on the left have no sense of humility whatsoever when it comes to disallowing other's expressions of Christian philosophy/theology - perhaps with the exception of the perfunctory 'pope talk' with fellow automatons of the anti-god.
The very phrase, Jesus is Lord, spoken publicly elicits criticism, scoffing, or ethical condemnation.
This is due to the Leftist Cabal literally enslaving the population. Enslaving them with their mind-numbing ideology. Enslaving them with the creation of their wicked imaginations. Enslaving them with their ideology.
It all began in the early 1900's when early progressive thinkers trained in 'neo-hegelian' philosophy (i.e. marxist philosophy) began to take control of America. They believd that freedom came not from God but from the Government.
Ever since, they have sought to make every gain possible, with the ends always justifying their evil means.
So, how is this criminal? How is this pathological?
Collectivism itself is an ideology of pathology.
RT Stillwell
Monday, March 4, 2013
Sequestration on the Hill
The prescient news in Washington seems to be the looming "across the board" cuts to defense and entitlements that seem to be leaving both Dems and Repubs cold. I'm of the opinion that while these cuts in spending are a major story, there seems to be something going on underneath the surface which has more to do with why leading figures appear to be so viscerally upset. If I had to make an uninformed guess as to what this, in fact, is - I'd wager it has to do with the negligence and lack of bi-partisan communication that is endemic to Washington D.C. more and more these days.
Bob Woodward on "Meet the Press" described there being a "Bunker Mentality" amongst Washington elites, and I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if this is altogether true. My own governer McCrory. upon a recent visit to D.C. described the situation there to be "very troubling" and "dysfunctional", which is a fairly forward thing for the new Governer to say publicly.
But something eludes me, it seems. There must be something going on in the annals of the executive office and congress that is politely being left unsaid. I can't, for the life of me, put my finger on it. Is it that each side of the partisan divide is steaming mad at each other? Is it that the Repubs have made compromises to the president and feel like they are getting little in return? Mr. Woodward accused the president of "not taking hold of the presidency", so perhaps it's that no one in Washington is taking any initiative on getting anything substantive done. No matter the case, I am of the opin' that there is something rotten in Denmark, and the American publik is being left in the dark about it.
How bad is our debt?
Does China really, for all intents and purposes, own the U.S.?
What is going to "change" in the lives of everyday Americans this year?
Why can't congress and the president work together?
What happened to the "transparency" we were all promised?
These are all questions kindly being avoided at the moment, not to mention questions that we don't even have the information to know to ask about!
The unanimous consent of the press seemed to be that sequestration is a bad thing. Is it really?
The only conclusion I can come to is that Washington must be reorganized, for the sake of the united states of America.
Domestic Democracy United
Bob Woodward on "Meet the Press" described there being a "Bunker Mentality" amongst Washington elites, and I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if this is altogether true. My own governer McCrory. upon a recent visit to D.C. described the situation there to be "very troubling" and "dysfunctional", which is a fairly forward thing for the new Governer to say publicly.
But something eludes me, it seems. There must be something going on in the annals of the executive office and congress that is politely being left unsaid. I can't, for the life of me, put my finger on it. Is it that each side of the partisan divide is steaming mad at each other? Is it that the Repubs have made compromises to the president and feel like they are getting little in return? Mr. Woodward accused the president of "not taking hold of the presidency", so perhaps it's that no one in Washington is taking any initiative on getting anything substantive done. No matter the case, I am of the opin' that there is something rotten in Denmark, and the American publik is being left in the dark about it.
How bad is our debt?
Does China really, for all intents and purposes, own the U.S.?
What is going to "change" in the lives of everyday Americans this year?
Why can't congress and the president work together?
What happened to the "transparency" we were all promised?
These are all questions kindly being avoided at the moment, not to mention questions that we don't even have the information to know to ask about!
The unanimous consent of the press seemed to be that sequestration is a bad thing. Is it really?
The only conclusion I can come to is that Washington must be reorganized, for the sake of the united states of America.
Domestic Democracy United
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
A Look at Muslim Barbarism
I wrote quite a while back that what muslims consider to be "Allah" I consider to be a good definition of "Satan". I still beleive, though with less of a flair for hyperbole, that this is marginally true. I've read half of the Koran, personally, and found it to be laced with line after line of "kill the unbeleiver" - almost used in repetition. Those who mistakenly beleive the Bible contains savagery need only look to the Muslism faith and the Koran for the real culprit. I'm not suggesting that all muslims are evil - quite to the contrary; most of them long for freedom. However, the Koran can irrefutably lead to some very evil outcomes, among them: 9/11.
Here, as reported in Feb. NR by Mark Steyn, is a simple bucket list of things you may not know about Muslims:
- In Wales, a woman beat her son with a stick, a rolling pin, and a hammer for failing to learn the Koran. He could only memorize a couple of pages, despite being abused... So she killed him and lit him on fire with barbeque fuel, claiming she now felt "%100 better".
- A ten year old girl was beaten by her mother, one Asia Parveen, for not reading the Koran enough. She sustained 56 injuries...
- A muslim slit his daughters throat in London for being "too westernized".
- In Sweden, a 5-month-old baby was beaten to death with the Koran.
Muslims are responsible for their culture; and their culture is one, inherently, of malicious evil.
The hoardes of muslims with anti-american views are increasingly becoming a problem for the citizens of countries they've immigrated to. The extent to which they carry their anti-americanism with them into our country cannot be understated. It is the opinion of Domestic Democracy United that if they don't like it, they can get out.
The sheer numbers of them is troublesome. And in Europe, it must be unimaginable terror for native citizens to see their towns and cities over-run with muslim immigrants.
In N.C., I hope to see a return to normalcy... however, it's far from probable.
...And in D.C. and surrounding area's I can tell you, there are so many muslims it would seem unimaginable to your average rural American. But no one can refute the numbers. According to the 2011 census, the muslim population in the U.S. has doubled since 9/11.
And for this short article I'll leave you with one simple fact:
57 percent of Paki's in Briton are married to their first cousins.
DDU
Here, as reported in Feb. NR by Mark Steyn, is a simple bucket list of things you may not know about Muslims:
- In Wales, a woman beat her son with a stick, a rolling pin, and a hammer for failing to learn the Koran. He could only memorize a couple of pages, despite being abused... So she killed him and lit him on fire with barbeque fuel, claiming she now felt "%100 better".
- A ten year old girl was beaten by her mother, one Asia Parveen, for not reading the Koran enough. She sustained 56 injuries...
- A muslim slit his daughters throat in London for being "too westernized".
- In Sweden, a 5-month-old baby was beaten to death with the Koran.
Muslims are responsible for their culture; and their culture is one, inherently, of malicious evil.
The hoardes of muslims with anti-american views are increasingly becoming a problem for the citizens of countries they've immigrated to. The extent to which they carry their anti-americanism with them into our country cannot be understated. It is the opinion of Domestic Democracy United that if they don't like it, they can get out.
The sheer numbers of them is troublesome. And in Europe, it must be unimaginable terror for native citizens to see their towns and cities over-run with muslim immigrants.
In N.C., I hope to see a return to normalcy... however, it's far from probable.
...And in D.C. and surrounding area's I can tell you, there are so many muslims it would seem unimaginable to your average rural American. But no one can refute the numbers. According to the 2011 census, the muslim population in the U.S. has doubled since 9/11.
And for this short article I'll leave you with one simple fact:
57 percent of Paki's in Briton are married to their first cousins.
DDU
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
The Differance of Love and Hate
Perhaps the most pressing of concerns regarding emotional integrity within the self-as-such is that of the contrast between the existentiel meanings of love and it's opposite, hate.
What is the best way to phenomenologically reduce these two objects of spirit? To reflect? To observe? To circumspect?
The only way to understand, truly, the differance of love and hate is to apprehend the congruence of these apparent contrasting passions as part-and-parcel of each's own negative freedom. Emotion understood by way of apprehension absolutely delimits the meaning of each in an other. Love convalesces in loathing and hatred of self and object, unequivocally! Hatred-as-such is intrinsically intertwined with the mustard seed of loving as understood in a phenomeno-existential sense.
The congruence of hatred and love is freedom from being.
Emotion-as-judgement is to be seen, by virtue of the reduction of passion to it's components constituting selfhood-in-a-world, as the primordial constitution by entities of valuation. This selfhood is existentially restricted to degeneration into its negative freedom from being. A destruktion taken from being free to unencumbered coping with objects-as-such.
The very act of cognition of emotion requires a phenomenological apprehension of what a being means in a world of existence. Existence-as-such and for an existentiel proceeding as part of a totality of involved coping with the worldhood of being-towards-death. Our own utmost potential as ontical components is, by necessity, limited by absolute Spirit-as-such. The existent sentimetns phenomenologically delimit their negative freedom from being.
Differance is, for love, the existentiel realization of an ontology of passion-as-such.
Hatred is reminded of it's negative freedom in the absolute primordiality of love as differance.
The signature trace of the basic-in-itself compresses the classical into the post-deconstructionist. This trace-as-such makes known unto the conscience of passion-as-such within a world-in-itself the limits of apprehension of worldhood. The world is such that our own selfhood is comprehensively coping within a Cartesian teleological contrivance inhereted from a tradition of complimentary aquiescence to the institutions of normalcy in ethics rather than the delimiting of passion-to-itself.
To contextualize this is to say that one knows hatred often accompanies the emotional strategy of love-as-such. Love is, as well, very often part-and-parcel with the universal object of hatred-in-itself.
Each delimits the differance of an other.
To love - let's give good ardent phenomenological inquisition.
To hate - we must give the existential meaning of the differance of opposition a framework in the concretely existentio-temporal worldhood of Being-in-the-world.
To the passions!
\DDU
Key terms and constructions derived from Derrida, Heidegger, Hegel, Solomon, and Nietzsche.
"Differance", "trace","limiting" and "delimiting" are references to Derrida.
"Existential" and "existentiel", "basic", and "coping" as well as "ontical" and the various stitching together of language to create a new concept are derived from Heidegger.
The "Phenomenology" and opposition of concepts are derived from Hegel.
The framework upon which to understand emotion is derived from Solomon; and it is through Solomons interpretation of Nietzsche that the stylizations and revaluations are derived.
What I'm really getting at with this article is taking away the focus on Post-Modernism and positing my own "Post-Deconstructionism".
Thanks!
R.T. Stillwell
What is the best way to phenomenologically reduce these two objects of spirit? To reflect? To observe? To circumspect?
The only way to understand, truly, the differance of love and hate is to apprehend the congruence of these apparent contrasting passions as part-and-parcel of each's own negative freedom. Emotion understood by way of apprehension absolutely delimits the meaning of each in an other. Love convalesces in loathing and hatred of self and object, unequivocally! Hatred-as-such is intrinsically intertwined with the mustard seed of loving as understood in a phenomeno-existential sense.
The congruence of hatred and love is freedom from being.
Emotion-as-judgement is to be seen, by virtue of the reduction of passion to it's components constituting selfhood-in-a-world, as the primordial constitution by entities of valuation. This selfhood is existentially restricted to degeneration into its negative freedom from being. A destruktion taken from being free to unencumbered coping with objects-as-such.
The very act of cognition of emotion requires a phenomenological apprehension of what a being means in a world of existence. Existence-as-such and for an existentiel proceeding as part of a totality of involved coping with the worldhood of being-towards-death. Our own utmost potential as ontical components is, by necessity, limited by absolute Spirit-as-such. The existent sentimetns phenomenologically delimit their negative freedom from being.
Differance is, for love, the existentiel realization of an ontology of passion-as-such.
Hatred is reminded of it's negative freedom in the absolute primordiality of love as differance.
The signature trace of the basic-in-itself compresses the classical into the post-deconstructionist. This trace-as-such makes known unto the conscience of passion-as-such within a world-in-itself the limits of apprehension of worldhood. The world is such that our own selfhood is comprehensively coping within a Cartesian teleological contrivance inhereted from a tradition of complimentary aquiescence to the institutions of normalcy in ethics rather than the delimiting of passion-to-itself.
To contextualize this is to say that one knows hatred often accompanies the emotional strategy of love-as-such. Love is, as well, very often part-and-parcel with the universal object of hatred-in-itself.
Each delimits the differance of an other.
To love - let's give good ardent phenomenological inquisition.
To hate - we must give the existential meaning of the differance of opposition a framework in the concretely existentio-temporal worldhood of Being-in-the-world.
To the passions!
\DDU
Key terms and constructions derived from Derrida, Heidegger, Hegel, Solomon, and Nietzsche.
"Differance", "trace","limiting" and "delimiting" are references to Derrida.
"Existential" and "existentiel", "basic", and "coping" as well as "ontical" and the various stitching together of language to create a new concept are derived from Heidegger.
The "Phenomenology" and opposition of concepts are derived from Hegel.
The framework upon which to understand emotion is derived from Solomon; and it is through Solomons interpretation of Nietzsche that the stylizations and revaluations are derived.
What I'm really getting at with this article is taking away the focus on Post-Modernism and positing my own "Post-Deconstructionism".
Thanks!
R.T. Stillwell
New DDU DIALUP
About ten minutes of reading the recent philosophical entries in, so to speak, my own words. Meant to clear up the confusion around the recent philosophical works within Politalk. Sorry to my regular readers for the deviation from the usual coverage of U.S. Politik.
Hope this clears up the confusion around the language used in "...Sins of Want", "Noble Being-Unto-Death" and "Service...".
Probably won't.
Again, apologies for the jargon. Will be back on the political beat properly A.S.A.P ~
So stay locked!
Domestic Democracy United
"Download 'Citizen Sh*t' for the tracks featured in this episode of DDU DIALUP. Finest quality emo remixes with a little surprise at the end. Featured on absolutepunk.net. Mind the whine! Also, the 'Punk Propaganda' LP is highly recommended for those with a taste for the abrasive. Please do DDU a favor a simply quickly download some of the "Emo Headache" content... Lot's of work went into these short little compositions, and I would greatly appreciate if you would consider these a companion piece to Politalk."
-Brendan O'Connell
*Cop "Citizen Sh*t" EP
http://clipcarbine.bandcamp.com/album/citizen-shit-ep
All the songs from this edition of DDU DIALUP + PATRIOTIC PUNK EXCESS IN E. HEADACHE'S NATIONALISTIC NSA WIRETAP GABBA
- a 7 minute excursion into G.W. Bush's speech on the creation of Homeland Security set to that roiling orchestra track from "Starship Troopers" used in the nefarious guilty pleasure of paranoid libs known as Infowars/Prison Planet.
"Really quite interesting to hear ole Dubya talking about homeland security over the recognizable chaser from Alex Jones' 'war on serenity'."
Disclaimer: DDU does not support the opinions and views of Alex Jones.
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
In Defense of the Establishment GOP As It Stands
The current news for many conservatives and liberals alike in regards to the establishment GOP is the unsettling incongruence between many social conservatives as properly understood and what, as is unfairly charicatured, are known as "Country Club Republicans".
I am of the opin' that this split is entirely engineered by the Regime and its disciples in the media with the purpose of kicking the conservative movement while it is down, hoping to fracture the long uncomfortable alliance between more affluent conservo's and their compatriots bestowed with markedly redder necks.
It was reported by Rush Limbaugh that a close freind of the president had decreed that their administration should attempt to create discontent among these wings of the GOP - so, despite many people on the left's doubts as to Rush's credentials as a journalist, this is far from speculation.
There have even been whispers of creating a third party.
"I wouldn't speak this to anybody or John McCain may come to your house in the night and send you to prison"
- Rush 2/5/2013
All joking aside, I - as head of Tea Party organization DDU - would like to voice my support for the strategies and actions of the Grand Ole' Party of late. For example, the decision to make amends and bend at the last minute in leu of the debt ceiling was honorable and responsible to the highest degree.
The high ups in the party know these types of maneuvers will be unpopular with certain elements of their constituency - but they do the best thing for the country, now as before. They know what kind of sacrifices true service-as-such takes, and are willing to take the tough decision points seriously enough to react beyond the mere ideological lock step that so often seems the rights weakness. What we are seeing is not, as some have grossly mischaracterized, the degeneration and dissolution of the GOP; but, in fact - the opposite. We're seeing state's rights as a position taken so seriously that it stands above all else in terms of platform.
The GOP strategy is thus: We lost the POTUS election, but there are many state's that did not support this outcome; therefore, we are to fight for individual state's rights before all else.
We see the admissions of the right and the lack of ardent protest of the Regime's policies, yet fail to see the tooth and nail battle for state's rights in the context of what 'Bama seeks to do, truly, with the victory of Obamacare. They are making great strides and leaps to secure for states the most precient and salient demands, above all: the demand to stay out of this Obamacare thing as much as damned possible. If anyone can prevent the implementation of the truly fascist aspects of Obamacare's effects, I, for one, beleive the GOP can.
Yet the dissent among conservatives is, currently, seething and frothing from the mouth.
What those disillusioned conservatives need to focus on is not giving in to needless in-fighting and putting their energies where they are needed; in a sustained conservative protest movement that backs the GOP fully and can help give libertarian-leaning libs a reason to feel like they should take up arms with their neo-conservative brethren!
We're all in this together, and though there is little we can do to stem the tide of collectivism, we can (to quote Buckley) stand athwart shouting no!
And we should!
The power of individuals in state government and their constituents to rally around a vision of America that hearkens not merely to the Founders but to that America that, as Glenn Beck said, we haven't forgotten shouldn't be underestimated. That America we remember. It's not lost.
I'll leave you, faithfull reader, with what is - to me - breaking news.
From Feb. NR:
"It's possible... that President Obama will skip blithely from triumph to triumph, nudging a lowing herd of dredulous millenials into the pen of joyless collectivism, emerging periodically to give a hectoring address while jutting his chin at the Future, mistaking hortatory hollering for persuasion."
I wish you the best in your endeavors to fight for Freedom.
FROM DOMESTIC DEMOCRACY UNITED HEADQUARTERS IN RALEIGH NC
Signing off,
Brendan O'Connell
I am of the opin' that this split is entirely engineered by the Regime and its disciples in the media with the purpose of kicking the conservative movement while it is down, hoping to fracture the long uncomfortable alliance between more affluent conservo's and their compatriots bestowed with markedly redder necks.
It was reported by Rush Limbaugh that a close freind of the president had decreed that their administration should attempt to create discontent among these wings of the GOP - so, despite many people on the left's doubts as to Rush's credentials as a journalist, this is far from speculation.
There have even been whispers of creating a third party.
"I wouldn't speak this to anybody or John McCain may come to your house in the night and send you to prison"
- Rush 2/5/2013
All joking aside, I - as head of Tea Party organization DDU - would like to voice my support for the strategies and actions of the Grand Ole' Party of late. For example, the decision to make amends and bend at the last minute in leu of the debt ceiling was honorable and responsible to the highest degree.
The high ups in the party know these types of maneuvers will be unpopular with certain elements of their constituency - but they do the best thing for the country, now as before. They know what kind of sacrifices true service-as-such takes, and are willing to take the tough decision points seriously enough to react beyond the mere ideological lock step that so often seems the rights weakness. What we are seeing is not, as some have grossly mischaracterized, the degeneration and dissolution of the GOP; but, in fact - the opposite. We're seeing state's rights as a position taken so seriously that it stands above all else in terms of platform.
The GOP strategy is thus: We lost the POTUS election, but there are many state's that did not support this outcome; therefore, we are to fight for individual state's rights before all else.
We see the admissions of the right and the lack of ardent protest of the Regime's policies, yet fail to see the tooth and nail battle for state's rights in the context of what 'Bama seeks to do, truly, with the victory of Obamacare. They are making great strides and leaps to secure for states the most precient and salient demands, above all: the demand to stay out of this Obamacare thing as much as damned possible. If anyone can prevent the implementation of the truly fascist aspects of Obamacare's effects, I, for one, beleive the GOP can.
Yet the dissent among conservatives is, currently, seething and frothing from the mouth.
What those disillusioned conservatives need to focus on is not giving in to needless in-fighting and putting their energies where they are needed; in a sustained conservative protest movement that backs the GOP fully and can help give libertarian-leaning libs a reason to feel like they should take up arms with their neo-conservative brethren!
We're all in this together, and though there is little we can do to stem the tide of collectivism, we can (to quote Buckley) stand athwart shouting no!
And we should!
The power of individuals in state government and their constituents to rally around a vision of America that hearkens not merely to the Founders but to that America that, as Glenn Beck said, we haven't forgotten shouldn't be underestimated. That America we remember. It's not lost.
I'll leave you, faithfull reader, with what is - to me - breaking news.
From Feb. NR:
"It's possible... that President Obama will skip blithely from triumph to triumph, nudging a lowing herd of dredulous millenials into the pen of joyless collectivism, emerging periodically to give a hectoring address while jutting his chin at the Future, mistaking hortatory hollering for persuasion."
I wish you the best in your endeavors to fight for Freedom.
FROM DOMESTIC DEMOCRACY UNITED HEADQUARTERS IN RALEIGH NC
Signing off,
Brendan O'Connell
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Secretary of State Flails In Shame Preceeding Departure
Hillary Clinton, last week, was noticeably upset responding to questions leveled at her about Benghazi and her role in the failure of her department to prevent what, according to Rand Paul, is the "worst tragedy since 9/11" (paraphrase). Many establishment repubs question, to a fair amount, the performance by Clinton in what I've termed "cry-gate"; in which Clinton seemed to put on airs whilst drumming up a few tears in regards to meeting the families of the victims of the Benghazi attacks. Whether or not the crying fit the following day was, in fact, genuine is beside the point. It is the opinion of Domestic Democracy United that cry-gate was an act by Clinton that figuratively spit on the graves of the victims of the Benghazi attacks.
"Cry-gate was not only offensively grotesque, but a losing move by Clinton who seemed like a poor method actor looking for something to work with. The tragedy of the Benghazi attacks were not, unfortunately, so much melodrama."
-Brendan O'Connell
I wouldn't be so dire in my accusation, where it not for the fact that what occurred during cry-gate was irrefutably disingenuous. A breif application of Physiognomy would reveal my position that she "fake cried" is absolutely and unequivocally correct. What would my fellow Reston VA compatriot Frank Luntz glean off of an analysis of the tear reel?
I would wager that it would be classic Clinton.
Lies.
Waffling.
Taking on the inflection one finds convenient.
This lie, is in fact, one of dire consequence.
RT -
"Cry-gate was not only offensively grotesque, but a losing move by Clinton who seemed like a poor method actor looking for something to work with. The tragedy of the Benghazi attacks were not, unfortunately, so much melodrama."
-Brendan O'Connell
I wouldn't be so dire in my accusation, where it not for the fact that what occurred during cry-gate was irrefutably disingenuous. A breif application of Physiognomy would reveal my position that she "fake cried" is absolutely and unequivocally correct. What would my fellow Reston VA compatriot Frank Luntz glean off of an analysis of the tear reel?
I would wager that it would be classic Clinton.
Lies.
Waffling.
Taking on the inflection one finds convenient.
This lie, is in fact, one of dire consequence.
RT -
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)