As somebody who's been fighting for republicanism since 2010, when the tea party won us the midterm, I can say I'm proud to be an American today, proud to be a Christian, and proud to be an adherent to the moral code of the grand old party. It's almost as if Trump has created a zeitgeist that harkens back to a pre 9-11 mindset. Our glorious country of America, is a beacon of light for the entire world. So definitely reaching out to some of my foreign readers, people may not know this about Politalk, but I get a massive amount of traffic from countries far different from my own. So what I say to you out there whether you're in Iraq, Singapore or even Europe......
I say to you let's make your country great. If you're a bit of a traditionalist as I am, let's make your country great again. There's so much to live for. So much to fight for. So much to die for. The tea party for me is far different from the proud boys, or the oath keepers. The tea party, to put it bluntly, is a protest that believes in property destruction to send a message to tyrants. Why did we exactly dump those crates of tea into the Boston harbor in the original tea party? Why did they do that?
I'm not an historian. So to put it bluntly, I really have no idea. I can't imagine what it must have been like during that period of time in history. The main thing that I know about the tea party, other than that it's platform is oriented around property destruction, is that we have a right wing philosophy that speaks out against taxation.
William F Buckley Jr said it best one time....
In an abstract sense, taxation itself is collectivist economic policy. So I follow suit and say, why do we need taxation at all? It was as Ben Carson said on the campaign trail, we could literally fund the government just by asking the richest of the rich to simply tithe.
I honest goodness think that would work. Maybe I'm just being idealistic about the top 1% of wealth, but I think you really could fund the government and everything that we need to do obviously, one, by cutting unnecessary government services. But more than anything else we could simply allow people to give freely.
So when I say no taxation without representation, just remember it's coming from a tea partyer not a proud boy. Although I will give it to the oathkeepers, they are more traditionalist than even the tea party. The oath keepers are much maligned in the media in the same way that the tea party is. What the media through the filter says about The oath keepers is far far unlike what their organization actually represents, which ultimately is an evangelical club for dudes.
In the media they decry the oathkeepers as some type of violent radical extremists. Now I don't really know much about it just as I don't really understand history as such.
When I grew up as a kid, I was raised by broadcast television. I didn't want anything to do with history, I didn't want anything to do with math...
All I wanted to do was watch television.
So clearly I'm a bit of a dullard!
But the one thing that I remember about the oathkeepers was in a commercial they aired probably back in the mid to late 90's. History, right?
In this ad they talked about the oathkeepers' mission as an Evangelical outreach group. One of the things that they talked about is they would have I guess you would call it, a group camp out and get in nature with their friends and brothers and such, and actually as I remember it, cry together.
I do remember the commercial talked about how the oathkeepers was a group where men could come together and talk about stuff that's hard to talk about such as death, life and the struggles that men go through.
And what it said was they get together and cry, weep.
So when I remember that commercial for the oath keepers it really does seem far different than an insurrectionist group of religious extremists.
And over the years I've seen the same misinformation in regards to the tea party. Now I'm a proud tea partyer and that's the Republican standpoint I take. As opposed to, say, proud boys which are a bit more drink fight and f***** than even I could possibly hang with.
For example when I was trying to get learned, taking local community college classes, I mentioned to one of my teachers when I was signing up for their English class, and that I was really excited to write papers for the class because, and I really am a dullard for not realizing how this political belief could end my academic career, because I have a tea party blog...
...and the teacher, when I told her that I was a tea partyer, responded,
"Oh, you must mean those people who believe in rape."
Ah yeah....
Collectivist intellectualism is so disgusting in America. At least in y'all's country overseas you have some type of dedication and integrity through tradition. But for whatever reason this b**** literally thought that the tea party was pro rape.
I mean maybe they are I guess and I could be wrong?
But something about that just reeks of anti-truth propagandization through the filter of drive by media.
Tell the truth!
And the f***** up thing about that whole attempt to get educated was?
I was hoping to be an elementary school assistant teacher.
Now all you see on the news is how they can't get enough teachers to fill the positions!
Anyhow,
It could have been very different life for me right now if I'd have been allowed, which they really won't allow you to graduate if you're a punk rocker or an Evangelical, to get an education in order to fill positions in education.
So that dream being squashed by liberal radical academics, I proceeded to do quite a bit of a tea party protest..... (Understatement)...
Much of these acts I've documented over the years.
I won't air the dirty laundry on this particular blog, but what I will say is that in a way property destruction is what differentiates the tea party from other political groups.
I once said that the tea party really started, in at least our post-deconstructuralist age, as a watchdog group, who were auditing politicians and following the money trail to expose corruption.
Now, I never wanted to play Junior G-Man.
So what I did was the tea party way.
Property destruction.
A lot of people in this neck of the woods resort to homicide and violent crime...
I just wish somebody could explain to them?
Explain to them that violent crime is punishable far far worse than property destruction.
So I tell these kids in the hood? Right?
Before you commit a violent crime, just do property destruction. The punishment, as I can attest personally, is far far more lenient than any kind of violent crime, murder especially.
So I tell these kids if you're really frustrated with your lot in the world? If you're really at that point you're like about to just say fuck it and pop a cap in nigger's ass?
Your best bet is to just spray paint something on the guy you want to kill's house or something!
I know it sounds a little bit ridiculous but half of these cases of gang violence in Durham could be solved a priori by simply explaining to these kids that spray painting, let's say on your opponent's house?
It's basically not even a crime.
Murdering somebody or doing a drive-by shooting or busting caps or whatever?
That s*** is so f****** punishable hardcore these day rude boys would not believe it.
So, I for one, think that property destruction is the best form of protest.
Because it really truly is a non-violent protest.
However the radical ideas of mine GOP?
Fire and ice.
Ddu 26