The left wing Democrat operatives these days are so immoral, so unethical, and so unwilling to take responsibility for their errors in governance or otherwise it is abominable. We used to make jokes about abomination in America, turning the Politalk pun to reference our favorite Marxist president in America, Barack ole' Bama, describing his reign of terror against WASPs as an Obamanation.
If you question them on taking responsibility for possible unethical practices that they were a part of in the past, somehow or another they always completely refuse to accept even the smallest increment of responsibility in immoral behavior, their unethical party policy, or even that they themselves were complicit in personally.
It's honestly a bit ridiculous, that those on the left refuse to accept responsibility for things they've done wrong. I mean it's one thing to be unethical,
It's another thing to refuse to accept culpability in their own behavior, or in their party's decisions.
It's just a make or break point when it comes to the difference between liberal hacks' and Evangelical Republicans' understanding of repentance. I had once quipped that there are many different kinds of immorality as such. There are some who are quick to apologize to God through prayer for their sins. To accept one's own sinful nature, and admit wrongdoing. Then on the opposite side there are people who, even when presented with facts about the results of their immoral character and actions, refuse to even consider their own wrongdoing in terms of ethics. It's one of those things. Democrats on the left continuously have policy that renders bitter cursed fruit, so to speak. Their poor decision making, especially in the arena of political governance, is so plain to common sensical observation of the immorality in left-wing permissive culture.
I believe the age that we are now in to be essentially a Conservative Republican Christian 1968 revolution, but as opposed to anti-war, pro free love,
and muck raking through alinskyite social upheaval and community organizing. Their history defining political protestation, and 1960's New Left movement, the leftist cabal continue on in an anti-establishment ideology.
All I have to say is for something that was marketed as fun and carefree and loving, these guys on the left seem to get continuously more and more boring, more and more immoral, and more and more viciously vacuous...
But the difference is Conservative Republican zeitgeist differs from the 1968 hippie culture in that our movement is not to do with permissiveness, sexually, politically or otherwise!
But my 1968esque Tea Party political activism is the exact opposite of permissiveness. I know for me, I've been dating a lot of women who are absolutely gorgeous. But for my ontology that I consider to be a tea party movement, it doesn't have to do with free love. It has to do with chastity. Waiting until marriage to have sex. Being against pornography. Being against the normalization of perverse LGTBQ Schizophrenia.
One of the reasons I believe the left has essentially done their best to disregard the early discoveries in the psychological sciences done by Freud is because for Freud, it wasn't substance abuse and drug addiction that are considered to be in some way schizophrenic or insane. Freud essentially believed that all homosexual or bisexual behavior etc is to be categorized as insane in and of itself! Freud believed that bisexual impulses are a symptom of insanity, or schizophrenia as such.
So we all know that Freud used cocaine while he was studying children. So for Freud getting high on stimulants and such was not necessarily even considered to be immoral,
And Freud believed that all bisexual and homosexual impulses were evidence of near criminally perverted schizophrenia.
So with the left wing or new left as they called it in the attempted revolution of 1968,
They rewrote the psychological sciences to suit their commoner understanding of psychology sociology and anthropology. To them LGTBQ
Was a virtue. And with the intellectual academic revolution,
They essentially blotted out Freudian theory,
And the ethics theitin,
And replaced it with free love and open mindedness...
Our Republican 1968 is the exact opposite when it comes to sex and psychology..
As opposed to believing in free love as such,
We believe in sexual Chastity and restraint. We believe in the traditions of marriage to be between one man and one woman. We believe that bisexuality is evil. We believe that transgenderism is insane.
And we believe that sex out of wedlock is immoral and unethical.
My dearest grandmother told me something before she passed quite recently, and said that in her day it was unheard of for a couple to have sex without being married first.
Well I agree with that, and I'd say that type of moralism contributes to the conservative character in our present age, the post deconstructuralist era of American right-wing politique.
When we look back in history upon Trump and his administration, I think no matter who writes the history books this time, that this present age we live in will reek
of
Radical republicanism.
There are many reasons in which this time that I find myself in currently & blessed to be a part of, is dramatically and drastically revolutionary.
We're now celebrating America's birth, and looking toward the future.
I believe that we will see a new American century.
I believe that we will as a nation come out on top when this era progresses forward.
I believe that Protestant Anglo-Saxon Christianity as such,
Will be lauded as an ecstatic era of mankind and characteristic of a kind of Reformation.
Ddu
2026


