Obamacare May Do Another Round In The Supreme Court

Just in on the wire:

Obamacare's tax exchange program may prove to be problematic in terms of authentic "Law-as-such", and has been challenged in court, ruled in court to be a lack of sovereignty for the Fed, and now - aptly - appealed.
So the verdict?
This thing, the "Affordable Care Act", may be going to the Supreme Court once again.  And rightly so.  Obamacare does not have support of the people, the support of the state government's of the US, and - more than likely - doesn't really have active support from anyone other than those lockstep D.E.M. activists and cultural drop-outs of the leftist origin.
I say, bring this thing to the supreme court and let Justice Roberts have a good go at the technicalities again.  Because the fact is, we may have them this time on a technicality!
We simply must, at all costs, stop obamacare.
It sets the U.S. people up for all kinds of "nefarious abuses of power", not to mention a kind of conformity generally relegated to third world dictatorships and ilk.  We need to stop it, and if this thing goes to the supreme court, as we the people should do, as one commentator put it:
"I wouldn't bet the family farm that Obamacare comes out of this intact."

We need to stop Obamacare!

Why?

Because literally, a holocaust could happen from making the hospitals into federal institutions...
not likely, but Obamacare does give the government that kind of power.

We need to stop Obamacare, because it threatens the right of every citizen of the U.S.'s right to private healthcare.

Under the Affordable Healthcare Act, now your healthcare is the Government's business, and that is - on a state local or federal level - intrinsically wrong.

We need to stop Obamacare, because we don't need some dictatorship of a Regime of commie's ruling our day to day lives through the doctor!

We need to stop Obamacare.

And we WILL!!!

Zero Accountability From POTUS: U.S. Publik Left Out In The Cold By the D.E.M.

If there's one thing that has been truly transparent about the Hussein Obama administration, it's that they clearly have no accountability to the publik-as-such, nor any respect for the dignity of individuals in pursuit of happiness, freedom and independence.  Every ditto head has heard the double-face talk from the POTUS.

He promised no one would lose their coverage under Obamacare, yet tons of hardworking Americans have been dumped under the affordable care act legislation.

He promised transparency on warrantless wiretapping and other surveillance techniques leveled at U.S. citizens (not to mention german politicians), yet all we got was a series of lamestream apologetics ultimately meant to obfuscate the truth, confuse and scare the publik - and give those of a decidedly educated character a little tender meat to titter over whilst sipping wine at the dinner table.

He promised to be a moderate democrat, yet is truly - by a large and far margin - the most radical POTUS in U.S. history; an alinskyite whose political techniques are directly modeled after the mob.

I say, the D.E.M. (Democrat Establishment Machine) has gone far too far, and I - founder of Domestic Democracy United - along with the public demand accountability from this Regime.

You can't just take the power of this Country and run rampant with no consequences.

All of the malfeasances of this Regime are being accounted for, and, should the impeachment process commence, there should be ample evidence of unconstitutionality and corruption leading all the way up to the White House.

The fact is, the D.E.M. has a very nuanced, almost behaviorist mechanistic, tactic of domination.

Step One: Lie about your true intentions.

Step Two: Disseminate the lie.

Step Three: Force the lie upon the willing and unwilling alike.

Step Four: Lie about the lie.

Step Five: Destroy all evidence of the lie.

Step Six: Rewrite history as to frame the lie as truth.

All, almost assuredly, due to the fact that the D.E.M. believes the ends justify the means...

For the Tea Party, the ends never justify the means...

It's just free people in a free democracy acting freely according to the prevailing justice and writ and law of God.

We don't say, well - "Okay, we want a better society, and we know what that means to us, so we are justified in lying cheating and stealing to achieve these ends."

The tea party stands for freedom.

So join me in calling for the POTUS's accountability to the Publik of the world!

DDU 2014

Team 'Bama Goes After Our Children: Freakish Alinskyite Attack On Middle America

Here's the news I had rendered previously "too controversial" to take on:

Obamacare is now in the school system, using their sick and twisted cult of psychology/psychiatry to analyze normal adolescent rebellion in terms of some sick psuedo-language I've termed "new-speak".
If a child in America doesn't fit the definition of the safe, tolerant eco-conscious ubermensch that the Regime deems the only acceptable form of Being-as-such, they will be targeted by the Regime itself.  And they're doing it through the Regime controlled school system.

If little Johnny isn't "socialized" properly according to Democrat ideology - they will and have been singled out for inclusion in psychiatric/psychological treatment.  Sick freaks.

It's fine for some sociopath to be given the hospital treatment after he's made his mistakes in life - failed to live up to upward mobility and has drug problems in their mid 20's etc.  But it's not fine for Obamacare to make it's home playing field in our children's schools and classes.

Now, someone who stands up to evolutionary theory in BIO will surely be targeted by Obamacare!

Someone who thinks this administration is full of shit and speaks out about it will be pumped full of medicine, initiated into the Obamacare system, and pretty much become a serf to the Fed.

It's sick.  The people who promote and agree with Obamacare will surely get an easy pass.

But for those who disagree vocally?

They will be punished by this sickly Regime of communists.

Obamacare is fine, for all intents and purposes, until it comes into our workplaces and schools.  At that point, the fight is on.

Hey Barack Obama - go back to nigreristan!!!!

SAVE THE CHILDREN

DDU 2014

Constitution Under Attack: How a Repub Congress Can Save Us

According to recent supreme court hearings, all of the blatant and flagrant unconstitutionality of this administration CAN be fought; and all it takes is a little grit and gusto from the U.S. Congress.

In a recent hearing, court documents have held that under the constitution, unconstitutionality is traditionally combatted by the Congress, and if something reeks of aforementioned lack of safeness and sanctity with regards to the constitution, Senators CAN and - if elected this November - WILL fight back these legislations with clear headed Americanist bullying in congress.  I'd nearly forgotten that the Senate was capable of this type of legislation; what with the dem machine always lockstep in line with the POTUS and Repub Senators gladly whisking away constitutional freedoms and collecting their due pay.  However if we win in november, I can guarantee this will be a fight over the constitution.

And we need to fight for our constitutions.
The Department of Justice, Homeland Security, and FBI and CIA are ALL bound by the constitution.

Why don't we all just sit down, take a deep breath and remember that our - even citizen's - oathe to abide by is that of the constitution!  We can stop the ethnic immigration debate.  We can stop wondering why Congress is getting us nowhere on the new budgetary outlook.  we can even stop the partisan bickering;  and just get down to brass tax.  Why we do everything that we do.

The Constitution-as-such.

The fact is, the Regime is flagrantly abusing government.  We stop them occasionally, and do our best to fightback the tides and torrents of brute circumstance in regards to having a Radical/Muslim POTUS.
But there's one place, that broke today in the supreme court, that has been marked out for a battleground of honor and dignity.

The Constitution.

If we, as of the unstoppable win in the November elections, deem something this administration has done to be unconstitutional - we can and WILL stop it.

And wee can do so because the Constitution guarantees our right to do so.

I applaud the course the Conservative majority had taken in these past several years.

But now a new era of American Politique is dawning.

The era of the constitutions.

DDU 2-14

Shadowy Healthcare Industrial Complex Complicit in Enacting Campaigns Of "Social Justice"

Recently I found that my suspicions about the Healthcare Industrial Complex have turned out to be all too true.  Everyone knows Obamacare is rife with all kinds of "nefarious abuses of power", as I've termed it before; but few knew that this legislation effectively turns hospitals and mental health facilities into agents of a Socialist agenda.
It may sound hard to believe!
"Where I get my healthcare is now a... a Social Justice center?"
Yes, effectively.
Now I'd wager many wouldn't mind a little 'help the poor' sentiment in their healthcare services, but I'm afraid what the Regime is now guilty of, i.e. communism/socialism, is far more dangerous than a little extra good will towards others.
This was a statement by a representative of NAMI, a communist front group:

"The police and law enforcement system is unjust and needs to be stopped."

Now if that isn't dangerous Social Justice activism, I don't know what is.  Everyone, I'm sure, is familiar with that argument that the Regime has created a 'psuedo-law' that undermines and circumvents the legal system and law enforcement establishment;  however, putting that aside for a moment - If what the healthcare system is doing is actively undermining the Police - we're in BIG trouble.

The fact is, Police are the number one target for the international communist conspiracy.  They refer to those who put their lives on the line for the sake of security "pigs".  Well, as it turns out this sentiment is pervasively part and parcel with Obamacare.  Think of it.  What better place to organize than under the radar in a locked down healthcare facility.  They even have their own security forces!
In fact, this communist organization NAMI even has agents who are, mandated from the Fed more than likely, involved in police matters.  There are potentially even some of them working INSIDE police depts.

As everyone knows, communisms main operative goals are to undermine the credibility of the police, discredit their sovereignty, and infiltrate the police depts themselves in order to bring information on Law Enforcement back to the communist party.

This may well, if I'm correct, turn out to be a major component of what Obamacare effectively does!

I for one stand by the police.
I for one feel that the Law is the Law.
And if you do the crime, you do the time.






















God Bless America


























RT Stillwell DDU 2014

Fallenness, Brokenness and The Way Of Being-Unto-Death

In a fallen state of worldhood, it is apparent that our, as Foucault called it, Human Naturale constitution is one of not only sinfullness-as-such, but also a profound sense of lack of integrity.  Speaking an untruth not only conforms those who internalize this untruth, but is so readily understood as truth-as-such that the integrity of not our own selves but simply of the world-for-itself, under the darkness of a long night, is questionable.    Worldliness would seem to offer an answer to the being-unto-death of the worldhood of the world, and rightly so.  By being of the world, one can internalize an understanding of our own fallenness, and take a kind of solace relegated to the holy in our brokenness-unto-death.
It is my way of saying, be broken.
Understand fallenness.
The world-as-such has been fallen since the garden of eden, when Adam and Eve sinned.

Now, our only real repayment of this brute sin of knowledge and wisdom is in a state of spirit known as brokenness.  Brokenness-as-such is simply being repentancefull, as far as I am concerned.  It is simply and authentically acknowledging that we do, in all facticity, live in a "fallen" world.  One where the righteousness of heaven is nil, and we - in all truth - live in a world of sloven obedience to Abbadon, Leviathan, Osmodais, or whatever you might call it.
A state of brokenness is what is required for godly repentance - accepting that you have sinned, and it is only by virtue of the worldhood of the world's "fallenness" that we have even been offered a mere chance at anything approaching rightness.  Why, in fact, is the world fallen?
Simply by virtue of the collectivism inherent in the early christianity era crucifixions.
god saw how we, as in all worldly people etc., allowed our own sense of malice and conviction bring those early prophets to the cross to be crucified.  he saw how we stood, even PAUL, idly by and watched it happen.
How can we even be forgiven if he knows we are all in a state of being-unto-death that blindly kills prophets, and complicit thereof therein? In, simply, a state of brokenness.
Saying, brokenly, "Dear Jehova, I am sorry for myself and the way I've been living.  I am sorry for my compatriots.  I am sorry for my primordial sin."
Almost every day.

And it is Hard!  and A  HARD WAY!
But it is absolutely necessary for salvation.

"First of all, you must understand that in the last days there will come scoffers, scoffing and following their own evil desires.  They will say, "Where is this 'coming' he promised?"  But they deliberately forget that long ago by God's word the heavens existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water.  By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed.  By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgement and destruction of ungodly men.  But do not forget this one thing, dear friends:  With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.  He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.  But the day of the Lord will come like a thief.  The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything in it will be laid bare.

So then, dear friends, since you are looking forward to this, make every effort to be found spotless, blameless and at peace with Him."


This comes not from revelations, a very controversial part of the NT in this part of the world, but in fact from a small passage of the gospel I try to read as often as possible...  Peter.

DDU 2014

derived from:
Heidegger - Zein und Zeit
Foucault v. Chomsky Debate
Billy Graham's - "Crusade in Miniature" 12"
and
Adin Troyer - Jesus, Your Only Way to God

Mexicans Sending Hispanic Babies Over The Border In Grim Race War

From what I've heard, and keep in mind in N.C. Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants is an affair of the imagination, Hispanics of the Mexican origin are sending their "refugee" children over the border to be "cared" for by team 'Bama.

If this keeps up, I may need to write another piece on why it's inherently evil to have American services prompt for "press 1 if you would like these directions in espanola".  It's bloody bollocks.

we have to retrain entire school districts now, apparently, just because the louses South of the border can't keep their cartel kids in check.  I say, send em to the U.N.

Right now, criminal gangs are sending their wee little babes, all brunettes, over our southern border to find "refugee" status in our home country.  And if we refuse their citizenship?  If we refuse to let these wee little babes find solace in our, now, completely deprived Former U.S. o' A.?  What happens?

Well, it would appear because of our lack of compassion on the matter, we would now be in a civil law suit from the DOJ, who wants to keep mexi-cartel babies inside our borders!

It's a flippin joke!

I say, send their diapered asses back to where they come from, and quit botherin me NSA!!!

The VA Scandal: Exposed!!!

In regards to the queer "resignation" of the Head of the Veterans Hospitals, I can only quote walt whitman when he said, "Of the concourse of Power and Poetry, there is but one true course).  In effect, I should be congratulating Mr. Hussein Obama on his efforts of Justice.  I merely wish that translated a bit more for his Regime.  The malfeasance, and yes it is malfeasant, of the VA leadership should lead to - in the opin' of DDU - more "resignations" a.k.a. "Firings".

Curiously though the DOJ continues it's assault on civil liberties.  If only Eric Holder and Mr. Hussein Obama, along with his Regime, weren't so intertwined.  The DOJ, I think with some responsibility in this matter, has failed to protect Veterans as well.

I'm loathe to say this dereliction of duty - i.e. 60 Dead Veterans in Arizona etc. - is of proportions comparable to, say, Fast and Furious and that mess.  The DOJ should be audited.
But I'm sure that won't happen - just more Tea Party patriots having a little trouble with the Hospital Industrial Complex.

The fact is, Domestic Democracy United's main concern is not some Knee Jerk reactionary outrage - though it may well be for some.  The main call in for this supposed "concourse" to have recourse in recompense.  Some grief.

The brunt is, like with Al Queda, according to Rush affiliate IMPRIMIS, 30% of muslims living in the U.S. believing that former bad guy ******REDACTED******** was a good thing, that there was quantifiable loss of life.  And DDU always stands firm behind the statement of Roger Heartaway, back in 1974 that a SINGLE loss of life is a QUANTIFIABLE loss of life.  That is to say, even the Unborn.

But what does this mean for the VA Hospitals themselves?

That the same eugenics responsible for condoms, sex ed, evolutionary theory and subsidized abortions is responsible for these, more than likely, DEATH PANELS PERFORMED BY VA ADMINISTRATIONS.

succinctly and simply yours,

R.T. StillwellDDU 2014

Temperance is for Nerds, Losers and Dorks

The notion of temperance is traditionally defined as a southern hospitality of sorts, in which it is considered immoral to drink beers.

This, obviously, has no real existence in the south in the post-deconstructionist age - apart from the Obamanites insistence that everyone act like a dork/looser and whine about those who enjoy life.  Temperance is idiocy.  It is simply a way for those with grievances (and believe me, all nerds and loosers have grievances) to try to show others the correct and "enlightened" way of their own hypocrisy, that is - a grim farce in which every Cool-Aid drinker believes their own way to be the way of correctness.

It is not only a grim-farce, but indicative of a communist conspiracy.

You see, as often as the communist party is thought to be drug-using and defiant (and they ARE drug users), the fact remains that the communist party's platform is one of persecuting those who indulge in a beer.  One of their central tenants is to condemn the use of alcohol (obviously they prefer heroin and lsd - not to mention crack-cocaine).  They used this method of subversion against my personal hero - Mr. Joseph McCarthy.

When McCarthy attempted to, and succeeded at finding soviet spy's working in the U.S. government, he was overwhelmed with allegations that he was an alcoholic.  Personally, I think it's impossible to fight against communism without a stiff drink now and then.  But yes, he found over 40 soviet spies working for the U.S. government, and was immediately attacked due to the fact that he, on occasion, enjoyed a drink or two.

That's because it is part of the American Communist Party's platform to decry the evils of alcoholism and alcohol use!  literally.

So in summation, The ones who tell people that they are alcoholics are generally part - consciously or not - of a communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

And the majority of them are nerds, loosers and dorks who have no life and have read Marx one to many times.

Ask your average nerd how many times he has read the communist manifesto and you will invariably find that they hide the fact that they have ever done so.

It's a shame.

But always remember, never forget....




































The fact that Nerds, Losers and Dorks have no life and no accomplishments beyond their own soured sense of vanity.

Hooray for them!

But they shall surely rot in hell for eternity! lol




RT Stillwell, DDU 2014

Hey Teach- It's Point .0003 Percent

I pride myself here at DDU/EIB affiliate, Politalk2.blogspot, as being - as rushlimbaugh has been accuracy checked by conservative fact checkers (i.e. watchdogs), as having a 93.6 percent accuracy rating on my narrative/commentary.

I'm here to tell you, dear reader, today that there is NO HOPE for america today, unless we sentence the victims of crimes to - *XPLZN*











































Big date, right?







































Ahem*

umm, the youth of america are better off with a .0003 percent deduction on textbook based curriculum.















































88888
88888888888
DDU lol
*************************

Review Of Hobbes' "Leviathan"

During a brief vacation, so to speak, I had the opportunity to read a work by Thomas Hobbes through, his "Leviathan".  Olde english permeates the language of the work, and makes for an aesthetically pleasing piece of traditional philosophy.  Such language as "publique" and "sinne".  Very often, the use of what today would be considered incorrect grammar induces in the reader a fluidity and ease of viewing and compliments his actual philosophy, the content, as well as gives one an historical sense that one would be incapable of finding in a textbook.

It would seem odd, considering I've previously "railed against" Hobbes, that I would give a favorable view of "Leviathan".  However, I would be lying if I said this work is anything but an altogether great work of philosophy that stands commendable and admirable, to say the least.  Not having ever read the famous "Nasty, brutish and short" description of human life and consequence in it's context, I was taken aback by how this phrase is, in all facticity, not written with any disdain for human life in-itself nor malicious whatsoever.  In full context, Hobbes explains that life is only so when there is no Law-as-such.  So, I think it is a shame that this "Nasty, brutish and short" idea is obscured by way of implying that Hobbes finds this to be good, necessary, or ironic.  He explains that humans meet a grim end when their rulers fail to protect them, or when a conquering military force decides not to have mercy upon the peoples in a country they've vanquished.

I suppose it's a testament to how one cannot truly in any way at all claim to understand a philosophy from mere snippets and commentary, and it goes to support my ongoing claim that philosophy as presented in academia is glaringly insufficient, because the majority of it is merely a textbook telling the reader what the ideas of monumental works mean through commentary and rather insufficient analysis rather than the reader coming to their own conclusion through immersion in the entire work itself.  Reading Hobbes cover to cover, I can only admit that I was wrongheaded in simply repeating Robert Solomon's analysis of Hobbes as anti-democratical.

"Leviathan" is mostly political and theological in content.  However, there is a great passage early on where he, as many philosophers are want to do, describes what it means to create great art.  I must admit, and I shouldn't flatter myself too much as one of the things that is apparent in Politalk is that I've nothing approaching an acceptable grasp of the english language, that I identified with his description of how the genesis of art comes about.  Composition, he seems to imply, is something that takes both passion and circumspection, with circumspection - as in intuiting where to make variations - winning out as the dominant mode of authorship.  Perhaps that's what he meant.

Perhaps not.

As was said by someone in the continent, famously, when asked what Hegel meant by one of his passages: "Only Hegel and God know".

I think the same would apply to "Leviathan".

One thing I appreciated in Hobbes is his lack of Dialectic, in an Hegelian or Socratic sense.

It's very much an individualist work, and remains - in my mind - an example of restraint in use of wit and humor.  There were many times that I laughed upon reading "Leviathan"

For example, when Hobbes described "Laughing" as making a kind of "Grimace".

Another thing I thought was interesting about this work was his affinity, apparently in vogue at the time, for insulting the Greek philosophes - esp Aristotle.  He's not exactly cruel about it, but upon describing what pagan Greeks actually believed I found myself again making one of those "grimaces".

The climax of Part 1 of Leviathan had me absolutely riveted, where Hobbes culminates his graceful circumspection in an attack on the Church of Rome.  Being partial to this kind of narrative, I have to admit I jumped up in my seat in shock and awe when he finishes the first part of his work with a sharp and decisive blow to the Church of Rome.  Though one thing I should note is that it was patently obvious that he was writing as such to please the new Anglican monarchy, a criticism I suppose could aptly apply to myself on occasion.  Another thing that I thought was a little lacking was his opening:  "For what is the Heart, but a Spring;  and the Nerves, but so many Strings;  and the Joynts, but so many Wheeles, giving motion to the whole Body, such as was intended by the Artificer."  I'm not attempting to say this is not appropriate use of prose, but in this reviewers humble opine it's not as strong of an opener as perhaps it might have been.  Still, it will remain.

In short, 

"Leviathan"

By Thomas Hobbes

"Fun olde english, fun to read through, and as entertaining as it is important to the disciplines of Law, Politics and Theology."

- Brendan O'Connell, DDU 2014

The Regime Intent On Shoving Obamacare Down The Publik's Throats

The Regime of the U.S.S.A. seems to have no compunction or hesitation when it comes to forcing Americans into an Orwellian fascist state.  Rush Limbaugh yesterday said, of the current climate in the former U.S.A., he's never seen Democracy fall so fast.
And there's one mysterious thing to blame this on.
Obamacare, otherwise known as the "Affordable Healthcare Act".
Obviously it is laden, in a legislative sense, with all sorts of nefarious anti-democratical abuses of authority.
But what do we REALLY know about Obamacare?

Almost nothing, to be perfectly frank!

I'd love to shy away from the sort of "conspiratorial" talk that some revel in; but to be honest, it's difficult.

Obamacare is not just a mess, but - in fact - an official fascist move by a Regime so set on the forcing the populous into a kind of obedience that it's willing to do just about anything to ruin god fearing American's lives.

It would be ironic, if it weren't so deathly serious.

The irony, if it weren't so scary, would be that Obamacare's stated intention is to "Care" for people, and, obviously, it is fairly readily doing the exact opposite.  It's ruining lives.  It's ruining our country.

It's wrong for America.

One thing I don't think this Regime truly understands is that mandated health reform (i.e. abuse of a necessity) may well work fine in the continent.  Perhaps not, but decidedly it IS something that Europeans generally have in their republics, monarchy's, or popular governments.

And the Regime, with their leftinista NPR diet and educated stupidity, love to think of themselves as... well...  a "little european".  They obviously have the sophistication of progressive eurocracy, and are just, well... a little "cultured", a little "more intelligent" than those rubes in flyover country.

They are obviously wrong, however.

Socialized healthcare is just, to put it bluntly, unamerican.

Obamacare might work well in other country's, perhaps -

But the Regime and their disciples forget that this is NOT europe.

This is, or was, America.

Obamacare is wrong for America, wrong for Americans, and just plain "wrong" altogether.

Perhaps if the leftinista cabal weren't shoving it down our throats, so to speak, I would be a bit more compassionate towards what would just be ill timed and wrongheaded paper work cooked up in D.C.

But they are very insistent on shoving it down our throats.

Raise your hand if you've had several, two or more, democrat stooges tepidly recommend that you sign up for Obamacare?

That's, if you experienced it, merely the veneer on a fascist Left wing - intent on fighting in such a vile and base way that the boxing metaphor is, unfortunately, no longer applicable to politics.

The Left wing fights like a UFC champion.
The Conservative Publik likes to, shall we say, keep the gloves on.

So I conclude by saying this small bit of Limbaughian fact:

Health Insurance provided by an employer was set to be eviscerated at the beginning of this year.
Millions were to lose their coverage provided by an employer and dumped into Obamacare...
But the Regime is so disingenuous that they delayed this until, predictably, after the 2014 elections.

It will certainly happen, however, after the elections; so that's a decent sign that liberal benevolence is inadequate for a functioning popular government.

DDU 2014

Thom Tillis Endorsement

I endorse Thom Tillis for U.S. Senate, to represent NC in that dark city of Washinton D.C.
He is truly a breath of fresh air for this repub, and I know that with proper foresight and conviction he will clench the nomination and the office.
Endorsed by the National Rifle Association and given an A plus rating by said establishment, Thom Tillis gets not only my vote, but my sincere congratulations on his support given by the NRA.  We need someone in Washington who can stop the persecution of rifle owners.
Tillis is not only the best candidate for the U.S. Senate, but achieves his status as top dog contender with the ease and grace of a true Christian - who GETS the ways of our fair state of North Carolina. He CAN win, WILL win, and deserves to win.  The NRA has backed Tillis, ensuring all of us in his district that the conservative ascendancy is one of proportions nearing the true character of the south.

Tillis not only has aptly refused to respond to the insipidly stupid attack ads leveled at him so far in the lamestream media, but shows a real attitude of conviction of principle.  I say OF, due to the fact that his principled stance on the second amendment shows he GETS IT.  He gets what we care about, he gets what matters - the constitution - and he understands the true care and concern of the southerner typically.

If I see another attack ad, coupling his free enterprise philosophy with environmental "concerns-as-such", i may sincerely get angry.  The union organized mafioso club-of-the-profane has spent their wad most likely already, trying to convince average citizens of North Carolina, USA, that future Senator Tillis is a crony capitalist dedicated to big industry.  It's laughable, not to mention annoying for a hardworking joe or jane to have to sit through, however brief, whilst getting the weather at 6 and 7 p.m. EST.  The unioners should halt these vicious and ill timed attack ads, lest they show their hand in the political game to be exactly what it is for millions of NCers - a sham parlor trick meant for decidedly middle class overeducated global warming nutbags.  Lay off unions!

Thom Tillis is what NC needs, and this Tea Party patriot succinctly would like to endorse  Tillis with the following:

"Do you want a fucking hippy communist senator, or would you like to vote for a true patriot and southern republican Christian?  I don't care.  VOTE TILLIS."

On The Conservative Character: Post-Deconstructionist Republicanism

Deconstructionism, otherwise known as post-moderninism, was basically the End of Philosophy-as-such.  It was massively in vogue for many years, and has remained a cultural icon for many, including the counter-culture.  Basically one can look at Po-Mo ideology as a hip european import, taken as true by the majority of academia for most of last century more or less by virtue of it's elite, hip, and altogether "cool" status as an anti-philosophy.  One could, as a teacher, dismiss most of the philosophies of the continent throughout history by simply making a cursory reference to the current psychological sciences and physics-as-such.

However, we must all surely admit that Post-Modernism - given a nomenclature that seems decidedly futuristic - has run it's course and is now, like many philosophical movements of the past, merely another development in how Academics rationalize away the Christian truth of the Bible.  It may have been all the rage for both exceedingly intelligent learned people and counter-cultural drop-outs looking for something to dote on whilst sipping latte's at their coffee den of choice; but we must all admit the truth:  That Post-Modernism is dead.

We now live in an age of what could be called Post-Deconstructionism; that is, the era following the Post-Modernist time.  It's a blithe term that I've coined, no doubt - and surely won't catch fire in academic circles or find anything approaching respectability; however, Post-Deconstructionist philosophy/theology is a force to be dealt with.

Think of Post-Deconstructionism as a return to the originators of Po-Mo ideology.

Hegel and Heidegger, for example.

Both of these decidedly Germanic philosophes are generally acknowledged to have spurned Po-Mo's initial conceptualization.   Indeed, without Hegel and Heidegger there would be no Post-Modernism as is understood academically and, more to the point, in the works of Derrida - the author most closely tied to Post-Modernism's genesis.

If you are still wondering what I'm going on about this for, you could contrast the Po-Mo thinkers and authors with a philosopher I'm sure everyone is familiar with: Sartre.  Obviously he was anti-thetical to Post-Modernism, and many Po-Mo authors spent a great deal of time making polemic assaults on Sartre the man as well as Sartre's works.

So all of this pointless analytical word salad is merely to bring to a head the main thrust of my argument, which I've made before in previous entries... that is, Po-Mo ideology-as-such is almost entirely atheistic while the authors who created works that inspired the very existence of Post-Modernism were very, very Christian.  Hegel and Heidegger too centered their dialectic and ontology respectively around God-as-such.  This is, despite the whining of many left wing black t-shirt clad Po-Mo cultists, an honest to goodness fact.

On a side note, to all of the readers of DDU's Politalk who may still be scratching their heads at the use of Heidegger, here is a short video of the man himself:

How does all of this apply to Conservatism/Republicanism in America?

Simply as such;

The key tenet that defines Republicanism is the idea of a Bible centered culture, rather than a secular one.  There may well be atheist republicans, such as author Tom Wolfe, but the key tenet of Republicanism is the christian ethic-as-such.  The left looks at things in a far more holistic manner, in which Bible and Government are to remain explicitly and implicitly heterogeneous.  They often loudly cite Ben Franklin's account of the separation of Church and State...  However, the philosophical integrity that layeth behind the Republican Party's family friendly platform and image always has a pointed and oft' historically minded retort to almost all of the whiner progressive's qualms; in this instance, Ben Franklin is known, factually, to merely have been addressing the notion of having an official government religion.  It is a far cry to say that this indicates that we must, say, remove the Pledge from the classroom as Dukakis did in the eighties.  

For every ideological position of the Left, there is a bold and thorough philosophical retort.

But the left wing is so brazen that not only will they refuse to hear it; not only will they refuse to let us speak it to others; but they in fact silence any opposition whatsoever, most often through the media and academia.

Intelligence warrants that theology and philosophy be taken seriously.

But those on the left, as per Po-Mo cultism, disallow us to preach the truth by saying

a) Philosophy is dead.

b) The Bible is Myth.

The fact is, Democracy-as-such would never have taken off if Po-Mo ideology had been the existent philosophy of the Founding Fathers, etc.

Democracy requires purpose,

and purpose

requires

god.